Cited by 270Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Universality of human microbial dynamics

Open access
Bashan, Amir, Gibson, Travis E., Friedman, Jonathan, Carey, Vincent J., Weiss, Scott T., Hohmann, Elizabeth L., Liu, Yang-Yu·2016·Nature

Abstract

Human-associated microbial communities have a crucial role in determining our health and well-being, and this has led to the continuing development of microbiome-based therapies such as faecal microbiota transplantation. These microbial communities are very complex, dynamic and highly personalized ecosystems, exhibiting a high degree of inter-individual variability in both species assemblages and abundance profiles. It is not known whether the underlying ecological dynamics of these communities, which can be parameterized by growth rates, and intra- and inter-species interactions in population dynamics models, are largely host-independent (that is, universal) or host-specific. If the inter-individual variability reflects host-specific dynamics due to differences in host lifestyle, physiology or genetics, then generic microbiome manipulations may have unintended consequences, rendering them ineffective or even detrimental. Alternatively, microbial ecosystems of different subjects may exhibit universal dynamics, with the inter-individual variability mainly originating from differences in the sets of colonizing species. Here we develop a new computational method to characterize human microbial dynamics. By applying this method to cross-sectional data from two large-scale metagenomic studies--the Human Microbiome Project and the Student Microbiome Project--we show that gut and mouth microbiomes display pronounced universal dynamics, whereas communities associated with certain skin sites are probably shaped by differences in the host environment. Notably, the universality of gut microbial dynamics is not observed in subjects with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but is observed in the same set of subjects after faecal microbiota transplantation. These results fundamentally improve our understanding of the processes that shape human microbial ecosystems, and pave the way to designing general microbiome-based therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature18301

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Faust K Raes J Microbial interactions: from networks to models Nature reviews Microbiology 10 538 550 10.1038/nrmicro2832 2012 22796884 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bashan, A., Gibson, T. E., Friedman, J., Carey, V. J., Weiss, S. T., Hohmann, E. L., & Liu, Y.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yang-Yu
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
534
Issue
7606
Pages
259-262
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2409622550
Cited by
270
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 19
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL091528)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
human microbiome, microbial community dynamics, gut microbiota, oral microbiota, skin microbiome, Clostridium difficile infection, fecal microbiota transplantation, interindividual variability, population dynamics model, microbiota-based therapy, Human Microbiome Project, microbial growth rate, species interactions, metagenomics
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Clostridium Infections, Computer Simulation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment, Humans, Intestines, Mouth, Organ Specificity, Skin, Species Specificity, Clostridioides difficile, Ecosystem, Metagenomics, Microbiota, Healthy Volunteers, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review