Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq

Open access
Treutlein, Barbara, Lee, Qian Yi, Camp, J. Gray, Mall, Moritz, Koh, Winston, Shariati, Seyed Ali Mohammad, Sim, Sopheak, Neff, Norma F., Skotheim, Jan M., Wernig, Marius, Quake, Stephen R.·2016·Nature

Abstract

The transcriptome changes driving the conversion of fibroblasts to neurons at the single-cell level are reported, revealing that early neuronal reprogramming steps are homogenous, driven by the proneural pioneer factor Ascl1; the expression of myogenic genes then has a dampening effect on efficiency, which needs to be counteracted by the neuronal factors Myt1l and Brn2 for more efficient reprogramming. The paths taken by cells undergoing direct conversion from one lineage to another via the expression of reprogramming factors are still undefined. These authors dissect the transcriptome changes driving the process of direct conversion from fibroblasts to neurons at the single cell level and at multiple time points. They find that surprisingly, the early steps occur in a homogenous fashion, driven by the proneural pioneer factor Ascl1. At later stages of conversion, the emergence of expression of genes characteristic of the myogenic lineage has a dampening effect on efficiency, which needs to be counteracted by the neuronal factors Myt1l and Brn2 for efficient reprogramming. Direct lineage reprogramming represents a remarkable conversion of cellular and transcriptome states1,2,3. However, the intermediate stages through which individual cells progress during reprogramming are largely undefined. Here we use single-cell RNA sequencing4,5,6,7 at multiple time points to dissect direct reprogramming from mouse embryonic fibroblasts to induced neuronal cells. By deconstructing heterogeneity at each time point and ordering cells by transcriptome similarity, we find that the molecular reprogramming path is remarkably continuous. Overexpression of the proneural pioneer factor Ascl1 results in a well-defined initialization, causing cells to exit the cell cycle and re-focus gene expression through distinct neural transcription factors. The initial transcriptional response is relatively homogeneous among fibroblasts, suggesting that the early steps are not limiting for productive reprogramming. Instead, the later emergence of a competing myogenic program and variable transgene dynamics over time appear to be the major efficiency limits of direct reprogramming. Moreover, a transcriptional state, distinct from donor and target cell programs, is transiently induced in cells undergoing productive reprogramming. Our data provide a high-resolution approach for understanding transcriptome states during lineage differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature18323

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Xu, J., Du, Y. & Deng, H. Direct lineage reprogramming: strategies, mechanisms, and applications. Cell Stem Cell 16, 119–134 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arlotta, P. & Berninger, B. Brains in metamorphosis: reprogramming cell identity within the central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 208–214 (2014). · DOI
  3. Graf, T. Historical origins of transdifferentiation and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 9, 504–516 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ramsköld, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Pfisterer, U. et al. Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to dopaminergic neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10343–10348 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yoo, A. S. et al. MicroRNA-mediated conversion of human fibroblasts to neurons. Nature 476, 228–231 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ambasudhan, R. et al. Direct reprogramming of adult human fibroblasts to functional neurons under defined conditions. Cell Stem Cell 9, 113–118 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Caiazzo, M. et al. Direct generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature 476, 224–227 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chanda, S. et al. Generation of induced neuronal cells by the single reprogramming factor ASCL1. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 282–296 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Merkle, F. T. & Eggan, K. Modeling human disease with pluripotent stem cells: from genome association to function. Cell Stem Cell 12, 656–668 (2013). · DOI
  11. Perrier, A. L. et al. Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12543–12548 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Li, X. J. et al. Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 215–221 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Camp, J. G. et al. Human cerebral organoids recapitulate gene expression programs of fetal neocortex development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15672–15677 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Di Stefano, B. et al. C/EBPα poises B cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 506, 235–239 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lujan, E. et al. Early reprogramming regulators identified by prospective isolation and mass cytometry. Nature 521, 352–356 (2015). · DOI
  16. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotency in human somatic cells via a transient state resembling primitive streak-like mesendoderm. Nat. Commun. 5, 3678 (2014). · DOI
  17. Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Huang, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols 4, 44–57 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zhang, H. M. et al. AnimalTFDB: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D144–D149 (2012). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Treutlein, B., Lee, Q. Y., Camp, J. G., Mall, M., Koh, W., Shariati, S. A. M., Sim, S., Neff, N. F., Skotheim, J. M., Wernig, M., & Quake, S. R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-06
Volume
534
Issue
7607
Pages
391-395
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2416402039
Cited by
451
References
18
FWCI
27.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature18323
The paper
Treutlein, B., Lee, Q. Y., Camp, J. G., Mall, M., Koh, W., Shariati, S. A. M., Sim, S., Neff, N. F., Skotheim, J. M., Wernig, M., & Quake, S. R. (2016). Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18323

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.