The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Open accessAbstract
Here we use the clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated Cas9 endonuclease complexed with dual-RNAs to introduce precise mutations in the genomes of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The approach relies on dual-RNA:Cas9-directed cleavage at the targeted genomic site to kill unmutated cells and circumvents the need for selectable markers or counter-selection systems. We reprogram dual-RNA:Cas9 specificity by changing the sequence of short CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to make single- and multinucleotide changes carried on editing templates. Simultaneous use of two crRNAs enables multiplex mutagenesis. In S. pneumoniae, nearly 100% of cells that were recovered using our approach contained the desired mutation, and in E. coli, 65% that were recovered contained the mutation, when the approach was used in combination with recombineering. We exhaustively analyze dual-RNA:Cas9 target requirements to define the range of targetable sequences and show strategies for editing sites that do not meet these requirements, suggesting the versatility of this technique for bacterial genome engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As an example, the most common Cas9 system, SpCas9, recognises NGG motifs and therefore only sequences adjacent to that motif can be targeted [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“CRISPR systems might be an alternative or a tool to use together with conventional antibiotics, either by disabling antibiotic-resistance genes or by developing toxicity in bacteria through the cleavage of crucial domains of their genome, exerting a bactericidal effect [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In early 2013, Jiang et al. used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to induce targeted mutations (insertions, deletions, and single-nucleotide substitutions) in the genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and E. coli strains [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“The type II CRISPR/Cas9 system has been exploited for high-efficiency gene editing in model microorganisms such as E. coli (Jiang et al., 2015), S. cerevisiae (DiCarlo et al., 2013), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013).”
From Gas Fermentation—A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks (2016) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Collectively, these studies indicate that although each base within the 20 nt guide sequence contributes to overall specificity”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“multiple mismatches between the guide RNA and its complementary target DNA sequence can be tolerated depending on the quantity, position, and base identity of mismatches [87,90,91,93], all of which contribute to potential off-target activity.”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Self-citationEnzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases
Gibson, D. G., Young, L., Chuang, R.-Y., Venter, J. C., Hutchison, C. A., & Smith, H. O. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1318 · Cited by 10,088
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P., & Siksnys, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208507109 · Cited by 2,769
CRISPR RNA Maturation by Trans-Encoded Small RNA and Host Factor RNase III
Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C. M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y., Pirzada, Z. A., Eckert, M. R., Vogel, J., & Charpentier, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09886 · Cited by 2,563
CRISPR/Cas, the Immune System of Bacteria and Archaea
Horvath, P., & Barrangou, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179555 · Cited by 2,471
Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes
Brouns, S. J. J., Jore, M. M., Lundgren, M., Westra, E. R., Slijkhuis, R. J. H., Snijders, A. P. L., Dickman, M. J., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., & van der Oost, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159689 · Cited by 2,460
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,007
Simon, A. J., d’Oelsnitz, S., & Ellington, A. D. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0157-4 · Cited by 90
Gas fermentation: cellular engineering possibilities and scale up
Heijstra, B. D., Leang, C., & Juminaga, A. (2017) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-017-0676-y · Cited by 97
Singh, V., Gohil, N., Ramirez-Garcia, R., Braddick, D., & Fofié, C. K. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.26165 · Cited by 92
Zhou, Y., Lin, L., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J. Z., & Jiao, N. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0824-5 · Cited by 92
John van der, O. O. S. T., & Patinios, C. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.022 · Cited by 102
A swapped genetic code prevents viral infections and gene transfer
Nyerges, Á., Vinke, S., Flynn, R., Owen, S. V., Rand, E. A., Budnik, B., Keen, E. C., Narasimhan, K., Marchand, J. A., Baas-Thomas, M. S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05824-z · Cited by 100
Carte, J. M., Christopher, R. T., Smith, J. T., Olson, S., Barrangou, R., Moineau, S., Glover, C. V. C., Graveley, B. R., Terns, R. M., & Terns, M. P. (2014) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.12644 · Cited by 95
A CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Selection-free Knockin Strategy in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Zhu, Z., Verma, N., Gonzãlez, F., Shi, Z., & Huangfu, D. (2015) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.04.016 · Cited by 91
Versatility of chemically synthesized guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Kelley, M. L., Strezoska, Ž., He, K., Vermeulen, A., & Smith, A. V. B. (2016) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.011 · Cited by 89
Kostyushev, D. S., Brezgin, S., Kostyusheva, A., Zarifyan, D., Goptar, I. A., & Chulanov, V. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03021-8 · Cited by 90
Suresh (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6518-2_7 · Cited by 78
Editing streptomycete genomes in the CRISPR/Cas9 age
Alberti, F., & Corre, C. (2019) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c8np00081f · Cited by 93
Skryabin, B. V., Kummerfeld, D.-M., Gubar, L., Seeger, B., Kaiser, H., Stegemann, A., Roth, J., Meuth, S. G., Pavenstädt, H. J., Sherwood, J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax2941 · Cited by 88
CRISPR-Based Typing and Next-Generation Tracking Technologies
Barrangou, R., & Dudley, E. G. (2016) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015729 · Cited by 91
Effective gene editing by high-fidelity base editor 2 in mouse zygotes
Liang, P., Sun, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Ding, C., Xiong, Y., et al. (2017) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-017-0418-2 · Cited by 91
Highly efficient base editing in bacteria using a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion
Zheng, K., Wang, Y., Li, N., Jiang, F., Wu, C.-X., Liu, F., Chen, H., & Liu, Z. (2018) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-018-0035-5 · Cited by 89
Challenges and tackles in metabolic engineering for microbial production of carotenoids
Wang, C., Zhao, S., Shao, X., Park, J.-B., Jeong, S.-H., Park, H.-J., Kwak, W.-J., Wei, G., & Kim, S.-W. (2019) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-019-1105-1 · Cited by 89
Engineered K1F bacteriophages kill intracellular Escherichia coli K1 in human epithelial cells
Møller-Olsen, C., Ho, S. F. S., Shukla, R. D., Fehér, T., & Sagona, A. P. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35859-6 · Cited by 90
Wang, Z., Mao, Y., Guo, Y., Gao, J., Liu, X., Li, S., Lin, Y. J., Chen, H., Wang, J. P., Chiang, V. L., et al. (2020) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.20.01033 · Cited by 87
Highly parallel genome variant engineering with CRISPR–Cas9
Sadhu, M. J., Bloom, J. S., Day, L., Siegel, J. J., Kosuri, S., & Kruglyak, L. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0087-y · Cited by 89
Yang, J., Sun, B., Huang, H., Jiang, Y., Diao, L., Chen, B., Xu, C., Wang, X., Liu, J., Jiang, W., et al. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00313-14 · Cited by 87
Site-specific acylation of a bacterial virulence regulator attenuates infection
Zhang, Z. J., Pedicord, V. A., Peng, T., & Hang, H. C. (2019) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0392-5 · Cited by 86
Wu, N., Lü, Q., Wang, P., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Qu, J., & Wang, N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21031104 · Cited by 87
Moniente, M., García‐Gonzalo, D., Ontañón, I., Pagán, R., & Botello‐Morte, L. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12704 · Cited by 89
Trans-nuclease activity of Cas9 activated by DNA or RNA target binding
Chen, J., Chen, Y., Huang, L., Lin, X., Chen, H., Xiang, W., & Liu, L. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02255-7 · Cited by 87
Homing Endonucleases: From Genetic Anomalies to Programmable Genomic Clippers
Belfort, M., & Bonocora, R. P. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-968-0_1 · Cited by 87
Cas9 Targeting and the CRISPR Revolution
Barrangou, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1252964 · Cited by 92
Planting the seed: target recognition of short guide RNAs
Künne, T., Swarts, D. C., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2014) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2013.12.003 · Cited by 86
CRISPR-Cas-mediated diagnostics
Li, L., Shen, G., Wu, M., Jiang, J., Xia, Q., & Lin, P. (2022) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.04.006 · Cited by 86
A technological and regulatory outlook on CRISPR crop editing
Globus, R., & Qimron, U. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.26303 · Cited by 89
A RecET-assisted CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Wang, B., Hu, Q., Zhang, Y., Shi, R., Chai, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wen, T. (2018) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-018-0910-2 · Cited by 86
Rousseau, B. A., Hou, Z., Gramelspacher, M. J., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.025 · Cited by 84
Corte, L. E.-D., Mahmoud, L. M., Moraes, T. D. S., Mou, Z., Grosser, J. W., & Dutt, M. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8120601 · Cited by 90
Zhu, Y. (2022) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/9978571 · Cited by 103
Bacterial CRISPR: accomplishments and prospects
Peters, J. M., Silvis, M. R., Zhao, D., Hawkins, J. S., Gross, C. A., & Qi, L. S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2015.08.007 · Cited by 88
Generalized bacterial genome editing using mobile group II introns and Cre‐lox
Enyeart, P. J., Chirieleison, S. M., Dao, M. N., Perůtka, J., Quandt, E. M., Yao, J., Whitt, J. T., Keatinge‐Clay, A. T., Lambowitz, A. M., & Ellington, A. D. (2013) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2013.41 · Cited by 83
Genome editing in crop improvement: Present scenario and future prospects
Miglani, G. S. (2017) · Journal of Crop Improvement · doi:10.1080/15427528.2017.1333192 · Cited by 86
Sharma, A. K., Nymark, M., Sparstad, T., Bones, A. M., & Winge, P. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32342-0 · Cited by 88
On-target activity predictions enable improved CRISPR–dCas9 screens in bacteria
Calvo‐Villamañán, A., Wong-Ng, J., Planel, R., Ménager, H., Chen, A., Cui, L., & Bikard, D. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa294 · Cited by 84
Steens, J. A., Zhu, Y., Taylor, D. W., Bravo, J. P. K., Prinsen, S. H. P., Schoen, C. D., Keijser, B. J. F., Ossendrijver, M., Hofstra, L. M., Brouns, S. J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25337-5 · Cited by 84
A CRISPR-based approach for proteomic analysis of a single genomic locus
Waldrip, Z. J., Byrum, S. D., Storey, A. J., Gao, J., Byrd, A. K., Mackintosh, S. G., Wahls, W. P., Taverna, S. D., Raney, K. D., & Tackett, A. J. (2014) · Epigenetics · doi:10.4161/epi.29919 · Cited by 84
Liu, D., Wang, Z., Xiao, A., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Zu, Y., Yao, S., Lin, S., & Zhang, B. (2013) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2013.11.004 · Cited by 84
Zerbini, F., Zanella, I., Fraccascia, D., König, E., Irene, C., Frattini, L. F., Tomasi, M., Fantappiè, L., Ganfini, L., Caproni, E., et al. (2017) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-017-0681-1 · Cited by 79
Vlot, M., Houkes, J., Lochs, S. J. A., Swarts, D. C., Zheng, P., Künne, T., Mohanraju, P., Anders, C., Jínek, M., John van der, O. O. S. T., et al. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1264 · Cited by 83
Application of genetic modification and genome editing for developing climate‐smart banana
Tripathi, L., Ntui, V. O., & Tripathi, J. N. (2019) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.168 · Cited by 84
Towards personalised allele-specific CRISPR gene editing to treat autosomal dominant disorders
Christie, K. A., Courtney, D., DeDionisio, L., Chao-Shern, C., Majumdar, S. D., Mairs, L., Nesbit, M. A., & Moore, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16279-4 · Cited by 83
Zhou, D., Jiang, Z., Pang, Q., Zhu, Y., Wang, Q., & Qi, Q. (2019) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01367-19 · Cited by 87
Challenges and Perspectives in Homology-Directed Gene Targeting in Monocot Plants
Vu, T. V., Sung, Y. W., Kim, J., Tran, M. T., Tran, M. T., & Kim, J. (2019) · Rice · doi:10.1186/s12284-019-0355-1 · Cited by 83
Chen, P., Zhou, J., Wan, Y., Liu, H., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Lei, J., Zhao, K., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-01989-2 · Cited by 86
Figueredo, E. F., da Cruz, T. A., de Almeida, J. R., Batista, B. D., Marcon, J., de Andrade, P. A. M., Hayashibara, C. A. D. A., Rosa, M. S., de Azevedo, J. L., & Quecine, M. C. (2022) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127218 · Cited by 86
Hong, W., Zhang, J., Cui, G., Wang, L., & Wang, Y. (2018) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00087 · Cited by 83
Genome editing in sea urchin embryos by using a CRISPR/Cas9 system
Lin, C.-Y., & Su, Y. (2015) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.11.018 · Cited by 82
Molecular tools and emerging strategies for deep genetic/genomic refactoring of Pseudomonas
Martínez‐García, E., & de Lorenzo, V. (2017) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2017.06.013 · Cited by 77
Synthetic biology toolkits and applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Chen, B., Lee, H. L., Heng, Y. C., Chua, N., Teo, W. S., Choi, W. J., Leong, S. S. J., Foo, J. L., & Chang, M. W. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.07.005 · Cited by 86
CRISPR Tools To Control Gene Expression in Bacteria
Vigouroux, A., & Bikard, D. (2020) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00077-19 · Cited by 84
Gong, Z., Wang, H., Tang, J., Bi, C., Li, Q., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05379 · Cited by 82
Gupta, S., Kumar, A., Patel, R., & Kumar, V. S. (2021) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06477-9 · Cited by 85
Engineering Gene Therapy: Advances and Barriers
Shahryari, A., Burtscher, I., Nazari, Z., & Lickert, H. (2021) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.202100040 · Cited by 87
The tracrRNA in CRISPR Biology and Technologies
Liao, C., & Beisel, C. L. (2021) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-022559 · Cited by 91
Zhou, J., Wu, R., Xue, X., & Qin, Z. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw475 · Cited by 82
Gu, T., Zhao, S., Pi, Y., Chen, W., Chen, C., Liu, Q., Li, M., Han, D., & Ji, Q. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c8sc00637g · Cited by 81
Exciting Prospects for Precise Engineering of Caenorhabditis elegans Genomes with CRISPR/Cas9
Frøkjær‐Jensen, C. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.156521 · Cited by 79
Hijacking CRISPR-Cas for high-throughput bacterial metabolic engineering: advances and prospects
Mougiakos, I., Bosma, E. F., Ganguly, J., John van der, O. O. S. T., & van Kranenburg, R. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.002 · Cited by 83
Spatial genome organization and cognition
Rajarajan, P., Espeso‐Gil, S., Brennand, K., & Akbarian, S. (2016) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.124 · Cited by 83
Efficient Transcriptional Gene Repression by Type V-A CRISPR-Cpf1 from Eubacterium eligens
Kim, S. K., Kim, H., Ahn, W., Park, K., Woo, E., Lee, D., & Lee, S. (2017) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00368 · Cited by 81
Genetic and epigenetic control of gene expression by CRISPR–Cas systems
Lo, A., & Qi, L. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.11113.1 · Cited by 72
Recent Advances in CRISPR-Cas Technologies for Synthetic Biology
Jeong, S. H., Lee, H. J., & Lee, S. J. (2023) · The Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s12275-022-00005-5 · Cited by 88
Sun, T., Li, S., Song, X., Pei, G., Diao, J., Cui, J., Shi, M., Chen, L., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-018-1032-0 · Cited by 79
Enyeart, P. J., Mohr, G., Ellington, A. D., & Lambowitz, A. M. (2014) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-5-2 · Cited by 86
CRISPR/Cas9: a powerful tool for identification of new targets for cancer treatment
Liu, B., Saber, A., & Haisma, H. J. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.02.011 · Cited by 86
Sanjurjo-Soriano, C., Erkilic, N., Baux, D., Mamaeva, D. V., Hamel, C., Meunier, I., Roux, A., & Kalatzis, V. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2019.11.016 · Cited by 82
Zhang, G., Dai, Z., & Dai, X. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.01.013 · Cited by 80
CRISPR/Cas-Based Genome Editing for Human Gut Commensal Bacteroides Species
Zheng, L., Tan, Y., Hu, Y., Shen, J., Qu, Z., Chen, X., Ho, C. L., Leung, E. L., Zhao, W., & Dai, L. (2022) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.1c00543 · Cited by 82
Genetically engineered bacterium: Principles, practices, and prospects
Liu, Y., Feng, J., Pan, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.997587 · Cited by 83
Directed Enzyme Evolution: Advances and Applications
Alcalde, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50413-1 · Cited by 81
Bosma, E. F., Förster, J., & Nielsen, A. T. (2017) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.04.002 · Cited by 79
CasFinder: Flexible algorithm for identifying specific Cas9 targets in genomesPreprint
Aach, J., Mali, P., & Church, G. M. (2014) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/005074 · Cited by 80
Enhancing the Translational Capacity of E. coli by Resolving the Codon Bias
Lipinszki, Z., Vernyik, V., Faragó, N., Sari, T., Puskás, L. G., Blattner, F. R., Pósfai, G., & Györfy, Z. (2018) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00332 · Cited by 78
Reassessing Escherichia coli as a cell factory for biofuel production
Wang, C., Pfleger, B. F., & Kim, S.-W. (2017) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2017.02.010 · Cited by 78
Phage Genetic Engineering Using CRISPR–Cas Systems
Hatoum-Aslan, A. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v10060335 · Cited by 84
A Stress Response Monitoring Lipoprotein Trafficking to the Outer Membrane
May, K. L., Lehman, K. M., Mitchell, A. M., & Grabowicz, M. (2019) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00618-19 · Cited by 83
Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy
Manjunath, N., Yi, G., Dang, Y., & Shankar, P. (2013) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v5112748 · Cited by 77
Targeted Transcriptional Repression in Bacteria Using CRISPR Interference (CRISPRi)
Hawkins, J. S., Wong, S., Peters, J. M., Almeida, R., & Qi, L. S. (2015) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_23 · Cited by 61
Tamer, Y. T., Gaszek, I. K., Abdizadeh, H., Batur, T., Reynolds, K. A., Atılgan, A. R., Atılgan, C., & Toprak, E. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz086 · Cited by 75
Harnessing the CRISPR-Cas Systems to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance
Duan, C., Cao, H., Zhang, L., & Xu, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.716064 · Cited by 76
Metabolic engineering for sustainability and health
Kim, G. B., Choi, S. Y., Cho, I., Ahn, D., & Lee, S. Y. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.014 · Cited by 77
Efficient Genome Editing of a Facultative Thermophile Using Mesophilic spCas9
Mougiakos, I., Bosma, E. F., Weenink, K., Vossen, E., Goijvaerts, K., John van der, O. O. S. T., & van Kranenburg, R. (2017) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00339 · Cited by 76
Duda, K., Lonowski, L. A., Kofoed-Nielsen, M., Ibarra, A., Delay, C. M., Kang, Q., Yang, Z., Pruett‐Miller, S. M., Bennett, E., Wandall, H. H., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku251 · Cited by 81
Tailor-made exopolysaccharides—CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in Paenibacillus polymyxa
Rütering, M., Cress, B. F., Schilling, M., Rühmann, B., Koffas, M. A. G., Sieber, V., & Schmid, J. (2017) · Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1093/synbio/ysx007 · Cited by 78
Hupfeld, M., Trasanidou, D., Ramazzini, L., Klumpp, J., Loessner, M. J., & Kilcher, S. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky544 · Cited by 77
Comparative assessments of CRISPR-Cas nucleases’ cleavage efficiency in planta
Johnson, R. A., Gurevich, V., Hayut, S. F., Samach, A., & Levy, A. A. (2014) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-014-0266-x · Cited by 76
Expanding the genome-targeting scope and the site selectivity of high-precision base editors
Tan, J., Zhang, F., Karcher, D., & Bock, R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14465-z · Cited by 79
Precision genome engineering in lactic acid bacteria
van Pijkeren, J. P., & Britton, R. A. (2014) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-13-s1-s10 · Cited by 78
Evaluation of sgRNA Target Sites for CRISPR-Mediated Repression of TP53
Lawhorn, I. E. B., Ferreira, J. P., & Wang, C. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113232 · Cited by 75
Yan, M., Li, S., Ding, X.-Y., Guo, X.-P., Jin, Q., & Sun, Y. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02364-19 · Cited by 75
Development and Application of CRISPR/Cas in Microbial Biotechnology
Ding, W., Zhang, Y., & Shi, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00711 · Cited by 81
Genome engineering and gene expression control for bacterial strain development
Song, C. W., Lee, J., & Lee, S. Y. (2014) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201400057 · Cited by 77
A CRISPR‐Cpf1‐Assisted Non‐Homologous End Joining Genome Editing System of Mycobacterium smegmatis
Sun, B., Yang, J., Yang, S., Ye, R. D., Chen, D., & Jiang, Y. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700588 · Cited by 76
A Multiplex Genome Editing Method for Escherichia coli Based on CRISPR-Cas12a
Ao, X., Yao, Y., Tian, L., Yang, T., Xu, D., Zheng, Z.-T., Chen, G., Wu, Q., & Guo, Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02307 · Cited by 75
Bacteriophage-based synthetic biology for the study of infectious diseases
Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M., & Lu, T. K. (2014) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.022 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bikard, David
- Marraffini, Luciano A
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2013-01-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-239
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC3748948
- OpenAlex
- W2000046950
- Cited by
- 2,429
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 245 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 208 · 2016: 203 · 2015: 174 · 2014: 183 · 2013: 98
- FWCI
- 98.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PMC
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Institute of Mental Health (DP1MH100706)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP2AI104556)
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (DP1‑MH100706)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, bacterial genome editing, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, targeted mutagenesis, recombineering, genome editing
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Endonucleases, Escherichia coli, Genetic Engineering, Molecular Sequence Data, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Genome, Bacterial, DNA Cleavage, RNA, Small Untranslated
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
