The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Open accessAbstract
Here we use the clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated Cas9 endonuclease complexed with dual-RNAs to introduce precise mutations in the genomes of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The approach relies on dual-RNA:Cas9-directed cleavage at the targeted genomic site to kill unmutated cells and circumvents the need for selectable markers or counter-selection systems. We reprogram dual-RNA:Cas9 specificity by changing the sequence of short CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to make single- and multinucleotide changes carried on editing templates. Simultaneous use of two crRNAs enables multiplex mutagenesis. In S. pneumoniae, nearly 100% of cells that were recovered using our approach contained the desired mutation, and in E. coli, 65% that were recovered contained the mutation, when the approach was used in combination with recombineering. We exhaustively analyze dual-RNA:Cas9 target requirements to define the range of targetable sequences and show strategies for editing sites that do not meet these requirements, suggesting the versatility of this technique for bacterial genome engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As an example, the most common Cas9 system, SpCas9, recognises NGG motifs and therefore only sequences adjacent to that motif can be targeted [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“CRISPR systems might be an alternative or a tool to use together with conventional antibiotics, either by disabling antibiotic-resistance genes or by developing toxicity in bacteria through the cleavage of crucial domains of their genome, exerting a bactericidal effect [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In early 2013, Jiang et al. used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to induce targeted mutations (insertions, deletions, and single-nucleotide substitutions) in the genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and E. coli strains [60].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“The type II CRISPR/Cas9 system has been exploited for high-efficiency gene editing in model microorganisms such as E. coli (Jiang et al., 2015), S. cerevisiae (DiCarlo et al., 2013), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013).”
From Gas Fermentation—A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks (2016) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Collectively, these studies indicate that although each base within the 20 nt guide sequence contributes to overall specificity”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“multiple mismatches between the guide RNA and its complementary target DNA sequence can be tolerated depending on the quantity, position, and base identity of mismatches [87,90,91,93], all of which contribute to potential off-target activity.”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Self-citationEnzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases
Gibson, D. G., Young, L., Chuang, R.-Y., Venter, J. C., Hutchison, C. A., & Smith, H. O. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1318 · Cited by 10,088
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P., & Siksnys, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208507109 · Cited by 2,769
CRISPR RNA Maturation by Trans-Encoded Small RNA and Host Factor RNase III
Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C. M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y., Pirzada, Z. A., Eckert, M. R., Vogel, J., & Charpentier, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09886 · Cited by 2,563
CRISPR/Cas, the Immune System of Bacteria and Archaea
Horvath, P., & Barrangou, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179555 · Cited by 2,471
Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes
Brouns, S. J. J., Jore, M. M., Lundgren, M., Westra, E. R., Slijkhuis, R. J. H., Snijders, A. P. L., Dickman, M. J., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., & van der Oost, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159689 · Cited by 2,460
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,007
New directions for integrated weed management: Modern technologies, tools and knowledge discovery
Korres, N. E., Burgos, N. R., Travlos, I. S., Vurro, M., Gitsopoulos, T. K., Varanasi, V. K., Duke, S. O., Kudsk, P., Brabham, C., Rouse, C. E., et al. (2019) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.006 · Cited by 126
Advanced CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing tools for microbial biofuels production: A review
Shanmugam, S., Ngo, H. H., & Wu, Y. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.107 · Cited by 120
Enhanced integration of large DNA into E. coli chromosome by CRISPR/Cas9
Chung, M., I-Hsin, Y., Sung, L., Wu, M., Chao, Y., Ng, I., & Hu, Y. (2016) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26056 · Cited by 118
Covalent Modification of Bacteriophage T4 DNA Inhibits CRISPR-Cas9
Bryson, A. L., Hwang, Y., Sherrill-Mix, S. A., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., Black, L. W., Clark, T. A., & Bushman, F. D. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00648-15 · Cited by 117
Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity
Gasiūnas, G., Šinkūnas, T., & Šikšnys, V. (2013) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6 · Cited by 124
Pol III Promoters to Express Small RNAs: Delineation of Transcription Initiation
Ma, H., Wu, Y., Dang, Y., Choi, J., Zhang, J., & Wu, H. (2014) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2014.12 · Cited by 117
CRISPR/Cas9: A Tool to Circumscribe Cotton Leaf Curl Disease
Iqbal, Z., Sattar, M. N., & Shafiq, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00475 · Cited by 117
Wang, G., Yang, L., Grishin, D., Rios, X., Ye, L. Y., Hu, Y., Li, K., Zhang, D., Church, G. M., & Pu, W. T. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.152 · Cited by 117
Bacterial therapies at the interface of synthetic biology and nanomedicine
Hahn, J., Ding, S., Im, J., Harimoto, T., Leong, K. W., & Danino, T. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00119-4 · Cited by 125
Current and future delivery systems for engineered nucleases: ZFN, TALEN and RGEN
Ain, Q. U., Chung, J. Y., & Kim, Y.-H. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.036 · Cited by 130
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering and the promise of designer flies on demand
Gratz, S. J., Wildonger, J., Harrison, M. M., & O’Connor-Giles, K. M. (2013) · Fly · doi:10.4161/fly.26566 · Cited by 114
Hatoum-Aslan, A., Samai, P., Maniv, I., Jiang, W., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.499244 · Cited by 114
Li, P., Kleinstiver, B. P., Leon, M., Prew, M. S., Navarro-Gomez, D., Greenwald, S. H., Pierce, E. A., Joung, J. K., & Liu, Q. (2018) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2017.0009 · Cited by 116
Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines
Barrangou, R. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0816-9 · Cited by 120
Metabolic Engineering of Probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii
Liu, J., Kong, I. I., Zhang, G.-C., Jayakody, L. N., Kim, H., Xia, P., Kwak, S., Sung, B. H., Sohn, J., Walukiewicz, H. E., et al. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00057-16 · Cited by 118
Leenay, R. T., Vento, J. M., Shah, M., Martino, M. E., Leulier, F., & Beisel, C. L. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700583 · Cited by 121
An overview of rapamycin: from discovery to future perspectives
Yoo, Y. J., Kim, H., Park, S. R., & Yoon, Y. J. (2016) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-016-1834-7 · Cited by 114
A rugged yet easily navigable fitness landscape
Papkou, A., García-Pastor, L., Escudero, J. A., & Wagner, A. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh3860 · Cited by 133
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering of CHO cell factories: application and perspectives
Lee, J. S., Grav, L. M., Lewis, N. E., & Faustrup Kildegaard, H. (2015) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201500082 · Cited by 117
Current and future prospects for CRISPR‐based tools in bacteria
Luo, M. L., Leenay, R. T., & Beisel, C. L. (2015) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.25851 · Cited by 116
Farasat, I., & Salis, H. M. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004724 · Cited by 114
Klebsiella pneumoniae induces host metabolic stress that promotes tolerance to pulmonary infection
Lung, T. W. F., Charytonowicz, D., Beaumont, K. G., Shah, S. S., Sridhar, S. H., Gorrie, C. L., Mu, A., Hofstaedter, C. E., Varisco, D. J., McConville, T. H., et al. (2022) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2022.03.009 · Cited by 109
Phage engineering and phage‐assisted CRISPR‐Cas delivery to combat multidrug‐resistant pathogens
Khambhati, K., Bhattacharjee, G., Gohil, N., Dhanoa, G. K., Sagona, A. P., Mani, I., Bui, N. L., Chu, D., Karapurkar, J. K., Jang, S. H., et al. (2022) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10381 · Cited by 115
Ubiquitin-like conjugation by bacterial cGAS enhances anti-phage defence
Jenson, J. M., Li, T., Du, F., Ea, C.-K., & Chen, Z. J. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05862-7 · Cited by 106
Natural and Artificial Strategies To Control the Conjugative Transmission of Plasmids
Getino, M., & de la Cruz, F. (2018) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0015-2016 · Cited by 119
CRISPR/Cas9: Development and Application in Rice Breeding
Romero, F. M., & Gatica-Arias, A. (2019) · Rice Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2019.08.001 · Cited by 118
Box, A. M., McGuffie, M. J., O’Hara, B. J., & Seed, K. D. (2015) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00747-15 · Cited by 114
Lin, J., Wagner, J. M., & Alper, H. S. (2017) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.07.005 · Cited by 110
Yan, Q., & Fong, S. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02060 · Cited by 112
Recent Developments of the Synthetic Biology Toolkit for Clostridium
Joseph, R. C., Kim, N. M., & Sandoval, N. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00154 · Cited by 115
CRISPR-based genomic tools for the manipulation of genetically intractable microorganisms
Shapiro, R. S., Chavez, A., & Collins, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0002-7 · Cited by 107
Visualisation of dCas9 target search in vivo using an open-microscopy framework
Martens, K. J. A., van Beljouw, S. P. B., van der Els, S., Vink, J. N. A., Baas, S., Vogelaar, G., Brouns, S. J. J., van Baarlen, P., Kleerebezem, M., & Hohlbein, J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11514-0 · Cited by 109
A glance at genome editing with CRISPR–Cas9 technology
Barman, A., Deb, B., & Chakraborty, S. (2019) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-019-01040-3 · Cited by 107
Ibraheim, R., Tai, P. W. L., Mir, A., Javeed, N., Wang, J., Rodríguez, T., Namkung, S., Nelson, S. J., Khokhar, E. S., Mintzer, E., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26518-y · Cited by 112
Metabolic engineering of plant secondary metabolites: prospects and its technological challenges
Devi, A. M., Devi, K. K., Pukhrambam, P. D., Devi, M. L., & Das, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1171154 · Cited by 128
Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans
Kutscher, L. M. (2014) · WormBook · doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.167.1 · Cited by 107
The Bacterial Origins of the CRISPR Genome-Editing Revolution
Sontheimer, E. J., & Barrangou, R. (2015) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2015.091 · Cited by 113
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
Pelletier, S. W., Gingras, S., & Green, D. R. (2015) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.004 · Cited by 108
Microplastics pollution in the marine environment: A review of sources, impacts and mitigation
Kushwaha, M., Shankar, S., Goel, D., Singh, S., Rahul, J., Rachna, K., & Singh, J. (2024) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117109 · Cited by 125
CRISPR-based technologies: prokaryotic defense weapons repurposed
Terns, R. M., & Terns, M. P. (2014) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2014.01.003 · Cited by 112
Functional genetics for all: engineered nucleases, CRISPR and the gene editing revolution
Gilles, A. F., & Averof, M. (2014) · EvoDevo · doi:10.1186/2041-9139-5-43 · Cited by 110
Advances in bacterial cancer therapies using synthetic biology
Chien, T., Doshi, A., & Danino, T. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.05.009 · Cited by 107
Genome Editing Tools in Plants
Mohanta, T. K., Bashir, T., Hashem, A., Allah, E. F. A., & Bae, H. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8120399 · Cited by 109
A quick guide to CRISPR sgRNA design tools
Brazelton, A., Zarecor, S., Wright, D. A., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, K., Yang, B., & Lawrence‐Dill, C. J. (2015) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1137690 · Cited by 108
Kang, H., Charlop–Powers, Z., & Brady, S. F. (2016) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00080 · Cited by 106
Profiling single-guide RNA specificity reveals a mismatch sensitive core sequence
Zheng, T., Hou, Y., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z., Xu, Y. M., Zhang, L., Niu, L., Yang, Y. Q., Liang, D., Fan, Y., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40638 · Cited by 105
Class 2 CRISPR/Cas: an expanding biotechnology toolbox for and beyond genome editing
Tang, Y., & Fu, Y. (2018) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-018-0255-x · Cited by 121
Systematic evasion of the restriction-modification barrier in bacteria
Johnston, C. D., Cotton, S. L., Rittling, S. R., Starr, J. R., Borisy, G. G., Dewhirst, F. E., & Lemon, K. P. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820256116 · Cited by 111
Nichols, C. A., Gibson, W. J., Brown, M. S., Kosmicki, J. A., Busanovich, J. P., Wei, H. Y., Urbanski, L. M., Currimjee, N., Berger, A. C., Gao, G. F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16399-y · Cited by 107
Kawamura, N., Nimura, K., Nagano, H., Yamaguchi, S., Nonomura, N., & Kaneda, Y. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4293 · Cited by 93
Genome engineering in the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Enkler, L., Richer, D., Marchand, A. L., Ferrandon, D., & Jossinet, F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep35766 · Cited by 102
Programmable Genome Editing Tools and their Regulation for Efficient Genome Engineering
Guha, T. K., Wai, A., & Hausner, G. (2017) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2016.12.006 · Cited by 117
Progress in Genome Editing Technology and Its Application in Plants
Zhang, K., Raboanatahiry, N. H., Zhu, B., & Li, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00177 · Cited by 105
A metabolic pathway for catabolizing levulinic acid in bacteria
Rand, J. M., Pisithkul, T., Clark, R. L., Thiede, J. M., Mehrer, C. R., Agnew, D. E., Campbell, C. E., Markley, A. L., Price, M. N., Ray, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0028-z · Cited by 104
CRISPR/Cas9 searches for a protospacer adjacent motif by lateral diffusion
Globyte, V., Lee, S. H., Bae, T., Kim, J., & Joo, C. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201899466 · Cited by 104
Tools and Principles for Microbial Gene Circuit Engineering
Bradley, R. W., Buck, M., & Wang, B. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.004 · Cited by 107
Different Effects of sgRNA Length on CRISPR-mediated Gene Knockout Efficiency
Zhang, J., Li, X., Neises, A., Chen, W., Hu, L., Ji, G., Yu, J.-Y., Xu, J., Yuan, W., Cheng, T., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep28566 · Cited by 104
Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 immunity for genetic engineering
Charpentier, E., & Marraffini, L. A. (2014) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.07.001 · Cited by 107
Pham, H. L., Wong, A., Chua, N., Teo, W. S., Yew, W. S., & Chang, M. W. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00511-w · Cited by 103
Combining CRISPR and CRISPRi Systems for Metabolic Engineering of E. coli and 1,4-BDO Biosynthesis
Wu, M., Sung, L., Li, H., Huang, C.-H., & Hu, Y. (2017) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00251 · Cited by 102
Brauer, E. K., Balcerzak, M., Rocheleau, H., Leung, W. W. Y., Schernthaner, J. P., Subramaniam, R., & Ouellet, T. (2019) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions · doi:10.1094/mpmi-11-19-0332-r · Cited by 102
CRISPR-mediated targeted mRNA degradation in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus
Zebec, Ž., Manica, A., Zhang, J., White, M. F., & Schleper, C. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku161 · Cited by 104
CRISPR/Cas9 Methodology for the Generation of Knockout Deletions in Caenorhabditis elegans
Au, V., Li-Leger, E., Raymant, G., Flibotte, S., Chen, G., Martin, K., Fernando, L., Doell, C., Rosell, F. I., Wang, S., et al. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.118.200778 · Cited by 95
CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers
Wimmer, F., & Beisel, C. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.03078 · Cited by 105
CRISPR-based gene editing technology and its application in microbial engineering
Wei, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Engineering Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.engmic.2023.100101 · Cited by 106
Genome Engineering of Virulent Lactococcal Phages Using CRISPR-Cas9
Lemay, M.-L., Tremblay, D. M., & Moineau, S. (2017) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00388 · Cited by 101
Medeiros, L. C. S., South, L., Peng, D., Bustamante, J. M., Wang, W., Bunkofske, M. E., Perumal, N., Sánchez-Valdéz, F. J., & Tarleton, R. L. (2017) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01788-17 · Cited by 104
Development of an Efficient Genome Editing Tool in Bacillus licheniformis Using CRISPR-Cas9 Nickase
Li, K., Cai, D., Wang, Z., He, Z., & Chen, S. (2018) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02608-17 · Cited by 99
Synthetic Biology Tools for Novel Secondary Metabolite Discovery in Streptomyces
Lee, N., Hwang, S., Lee, Y., Cho, S., Palsson, B. Ø., & Cho, B. (2019) · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.4014/jmb.1904.04015 · Cited by 102
Walker, J. E., Lanahan, A. A., Zheng, T., Toruno, C., Lynd, L. R., Cameron, J. C., Olson, D. G., & Eckert, C. A. (2019) · Metabolic Engineering Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00116 · Cited by 101
Adapting to new threats: the generation of memory by CRISPR‐Cas immune systems
Heler, R., Marraffini, L. A., & Bikard, D. (2014) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.12640 · Cited by 102
Sensitive cells: enabling tools for static and dynamic control of microbial metabolic pathways
Cress, B. F., Trantas, E., Ververidis, F., Linhardt, R. J., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2015) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2015.09.007 · Cited by 99
λ Recombination and Recombineering
Murphy, K. C. (2016) · EcoSal Plus · doi:10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0011-2015 · Cited by 111
Establishing a synthetic orthogonal replication system enables accelerated evolution in E. coli
Tian, R., Rehm, F. B. H., Czernecki, D., Gu, Y., Zürcher, J. F., Liu, K. C., & Chin, J. W. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk1281 · Cited by 99
Bacterial Recombineering: Genome Engineering via Phage-Based Homologous Recombination
Pines, G., Freed, E. F., Winkler, J. D., & Gill, R. T. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00009 · Cited by 98
Precision Targeted Mutagenesis via Cas9 Paired Nickases in Rice
Mikami, M., Toki, S., & Endo, M. (2016) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcw049 · Cited by 97
CRISPR/Cas9: An RNA‐guided highly precise synthetic tool for plant genome editing
Demirci, Y., Zhang, B., & Ünver, T. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25970 · Cited by 103
Evidence for the widespread distribution of CRISPR-Cas system in the PhylumCyanobacteria
Cai, F., Axen, S. D., & Kerfeld, C. A. (2013) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.24571 · Cited by 96
Heritable Multiplex Genetic Engineering in Rats Using CRISPR/Cas9
Ma, Y., Shen, B., Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Chen, W., Ma, J., Huang, X., & Zhang, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089413 · Cited by 97
Tian, T., Kang, J., Kang, A., & Lee, T. S. (2019) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00429 · Cited by 95
Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Hua, X., Yu, Y., & Ji, Q. (2019) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.09.003 · Cited by 94
Wannier, T. M., Ciaccia, P. N., Ellington, A. D., Filsinger, G. T., Isaacs, F. J., Javanmardi, K., Jones, M. A., Kunjapur, A. M., Nyerges, Á., Pál, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00006-x · Cited by 101
Apreja, M., Sharma, A., Balda, S., Kataria, K., Capalash, N., & Sharma, P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17374-w · Cited by 103
CRISPR/Cas System and Factors Affecting Its Precision and Efficiency
Javaid, N., & Choi, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.761709 · Cited by 106
Parameters affecting frequency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted mutagenesis in rice
Mikami, M., Toki, S., & Endo, M. (2015) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-015-1826-5 · Cited by 97
Targeted Large-Scale Deletion of Bacterial Genomes Using CRISPR-Nickases
Standage-Beier, K., Zhang, Q., & Wang, X. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00132 · Cited by 96
Cas9 off-target binding to the promoter of bacterial genes leads to silencing and toxicity
Rostain, W., Grebert, T., Vyhovskyi, D., Pizarro, P. T., Tshinsele-Van Bellingen, G., Cui, L., & Bikard, D. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad170 · Cited by 85
Targeted Heritable Mutation and Gene Conversion by Cas9-CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans
Katic, I., & Großhans, H. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.155754 · Cited by 95
Biofuel production: an odyssey from metabolic engineering to fermentation scale-up
Hollinshead, W. D., He, L., & Tang, Y. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00344 · Cited by 95
Kracke, F., Lai, B., Yu, S., & Krömer, J. O. (2017) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2017.12.003 · Cited by 95
Genome editing of Ralstonia eutropha using an electroporation-based CRISPR-Cas9 technique
Xiong, B., Li, Z., Liu, L., Zhao, D., Zhang, X., & Bi, C. (2018) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-018-1170-4 · Cited by 95
A rapid and versatile tool for genomic engineering in Lactococcus lactis
Guo, T., Xin, Y., Zhang, Y., Gu, X., & Kong, J. (2019) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-019-1075-3 · Cited by 99
Tadić, V., Josipović, G., Zoldoš, V., & Vojta, A. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.003 · Cited by 99
Zhang, S., Guo, F., Yan, W., Dai, Z., Dong, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., Xin, F., & Jiang, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00459 · Cited by 95
A versatile framework for microbial engineering using synthetic non-coding RNAs
Qi, L. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3244 · Cited by 96
Genome Editing in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 with the CRISPR-Cas9 System
Wang, S., Dong, S., Wang, P., Tao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00233-17 · Cited by 97
A Highly Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Large Genomic Deletion in Bacillus subtilis
So, Y., Park, S., Park, E., Park, S., Kim, E.-J., Pan, J., & Choi, S.-K. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01167 · Cited by 94
Dong, H., Xiang, H., Mu, D., Wang, D., & Wang, T. (2018) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.017 · Cited by 94
Improved sgRNA design in bacteria via genome-wide activity profiling
Guo, J., Wang, T., Guan, C., Liu, B., Luo, C. Y., Xie, Z., Zhang, C., & Xing, X. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky572 · Cited by 99
Engineering nucleases for gene targeting: safety and regulatory considerations
Pauwels, K., Podevin, N., Breyer, D., Carroll, D., & Herman, P. (2013) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2013.07.001 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bikard, David
- Marraffini, Luciano A
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2013-01-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-239
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC3748948
- OpenAlex
- W2000046950
- Cited by
- 2,429
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 245 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 208 · 2016: 203 · 2015: 174 · 2014: 183 · 2013: 98
- FWCI
- 98.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PMC
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Institute of Mental Health (DP1MH100706)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP2AI104556)
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (DP1‑MH100706)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, bacterial genome editing, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, targeted mutagenesis, recombineering, genome editing
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Endonucleases, Escherichia coli, Genetic Engineering, Molecular Sequence Data, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Genome, Bacterial, DNA Cleavage, RNA, Small Untranslated
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
