The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia
Open accessAbstract
New high-dimensional, single-cell technologies offer unprecedented resolution in the analysis of heterogeneous tissues. However, because these technologies can measure dozens of parameters simultaneously in individual cells, data interpretation can be challenging. Here we present viSNE, a tool that allows one to map high-dimensional cytometry data onto two dimensions, yet conserve the high-dimensional structure of the data. viSNE plots individual cells in a visual similar to a scatter plot, while using all pairwise distances in high dimension to determine each cell's location in the plot. We integrated mass cytometry with viSNE to map healthy and cancerous bone marrow samples. Healthy bone marrow automatically maps into a consistent shape, whereas leukemia samples map into malformed shapes that are distinct from healthy bone marrow and from each other. We also use viSNE and mass cytometry to compare leukemia diagnosis and relapse samples, and to identify a rare leukemia population reminiscent of minimal residual disease. viSNE can be applied to any multi-dimensional single-cell technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A powerful, nonlinear alternative5,105–107 is t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding108 (t-SNE; introduced for single-cell analysis as viSNE105), especially when computed with an efficient approximation109 compatible with the scale of large genomic data sets110.”
From Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics (2016) · cites this paper as [109]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424
RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2484 · Cited by 13,174
Bendall, S. C., Simonds, E. F., Qiu, P., Amir, E.-A. D., Krutzik, P. O., Finck, R., Bruggner, R. V., Melamed, R., Trejo, A., Ornatsky, O. I., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198704 · Cited by 2,279
Self-citationRNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities
Ozsolak, F., & Milos, P. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2934 · Cited by 2,135
Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review
van der Maaten, L. J. P., Postma, E. O., & van den Herik, H. J. (2009) · Cited by 2,062
Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data
Sachs, K., Perez, O. D., Pe’er, D., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Nolan, G. P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105809 · Cited by 1,785
Self-citationPetilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex
The Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group (PING) (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2402 · Cited by 1,491
Bandura, D. R., Baranov, V. I., Ornatsky, O. I., Antonov, A., Kinach, R., Lou, X., Pavlov, S., Vorobiev, S., Dick, J. E., & Tanner, S. D. (2009) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac901049w · Cited by 1,295
Exploring Strategies for Training Deep Neural Networks
Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., & Lamblin, P. (2009) · doi:10.1145/1577069.1577070 · Cited by 1,111
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P., & Theis, F. J. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 · Cited by 8,881
Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110
Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP
Becht, E., McInnes, L., Healy, J., Dutertre, C.-A., Kwok, I. W. H., Ng, L. G., Ginhoux, F., & Newell, E. W. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4314 · Cited by 5,358
Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients
Gopalakrishnan, V., Spencer, C. N., Nezi, L., Reuben, A., Andrews, M. C., Karpinets, T. V., Prieto, P. A., Vicente, D., Hoffman, K., Wei, S. C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4236 · Cited by 4,812
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir, E.-A. D., Davis, K. L., Tadmor, M. D., Simonds, E. F., Levine, J. H., Bendall, S. C., Shenfeld, D. K., Krishnaswamy, S., Nolan, G. P., & Pe'er, D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2013-05-19
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 545-552
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC4076922
- OpenAlex
- W1982729887
- Cited by
- 1,550
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 192 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 112 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 36.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (DP2OD002414)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HV-10-05_)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA121852, R01CA130826, P01CA034233, CA 09011, R01CA164729)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008798)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI100627, HHSN272200700038C, U19AI057229)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Keywords
- mass cytometry, leukemia, phenotypic heterogeneity, bone marrow, minimal residual disease, leukemia relapse, dimensionality reduction
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Leukemia, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Recurrence, Biomarkers, Tumor, Immunophenotyping, Image Cytometry, Bone Marrow Neoplasms, Cell Lineage, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review