Cited by 528Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityAntimicrobial agents and applications

Amphotericin forms an extramembranous and fungicidal sterol sponge

Open access
Anderson, Thomas M, Clay, Mary C, Cioffi, Alexander G, Diaz, Katrina A, Hisao, Grant S, Tuttle, Marcus D, Nieuwkoop, Andrew J, Comellas, Gemma +7 more·2014·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

For over 50 years, amphotericin has remained the powerful but highly toxic last line of defense in treating life-threatening fungal infections in humans with minimal development of microbial resistance. Understanding how this small molecule kills yeast is thus critical for guiding development of derivatives with an improved therapeutic index and other resistance-refractory antimicrobial agents. In the widely accepted ion channel model for its mechanism of cytocidal action, amphotericin forms aggregates inside lipid bilayers that permeabilize and kill cells. In contrast, we report that amphotericin exists primarily in the form of large, extramembranous aggregates that kill yeast by extracting ergosterol from lipid bilayers. These findings reveal that extraction of a polyfunctional lipid underlies the resistance-refractory antimicrobial action of amphotericin and suggests a roadmap for separating its cytocidal and membrane-permeabilizing activities. This new mechanistic understanding is also guiding development of what are to our knowledge the first derivatives of amphotericin that kill yeast but not human cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.1496

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amphotericin B kills growing and non-growing fungal cells by sponging essential ergosterols from the plasma membrane and generating lethal pores.

    “Amphotericin B kills growing and non-growing fungal cells by sponging essential ergosterols from the plasma membrane and generating lethal pores (43).”

    From Echinocandin tolerance and persistence <i>in vitro</i> are regulated by calcineurin signaling in <i>Candida glabrata</i> (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion supports killing by extraction of ergosterol from yeast membranes, but contradicts the claim that lethal pore formation is also required: it says ergosterol binding can kill cells in the absence of channel activity. The Online Methods describe stationary-phase cultures, but do not establish the claim about both growing and non-growing cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amphotericin B destroys the cell membrane through extracting ergosterol from lipid bilayers and is fungicidal.

    “Fluconazole does not have an antifungal effect as strong as amphotericin B, the latter which destroys the cell membrane through extracting ergosterol from lipid bilayers and is fungicidal.”

    From The synthesis, regulation, and functions of sterols in<i>Candida albicans</i>: Well-known but still lots to learn (2016) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Results section (‘AmB extracts Erg from and thereby kills yeast cells’; page not provided) reports that amphotericin B extracts ergosterol from yeast membranes and that extraction parallels cell killing. The paper does not establish that this process destroys the cell membrane; it distinguishes cell killing from membrane permeabilization. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amphotericin B kills C. albicans and C. glabrata with biphasic kinetics after a brief lag.

    “Amphotericin B, which kills fungal cells by depleting ergosterol and creating pores in the plasma membrane (43), was also found to kill C. albicans and C. glabrata with biphasic kinetics after a brief lag (Fig. 8, red symbols).”

    From Echinocandin tolerance and persistence <i>in vitro</i> are regulated by calcineurin signaling in <i>Candida glabrata</i> (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    Citation 43 attaches to the mechanism clause, not the biphasic-kinetics finding attributed to Fig. 8. The Results section says amphotericin B extracts ergosterol and thereby kills yeast, but the Discussion says channel formation is not required for cell killing, contrary to presenting pore creation as part of the killing mechanism. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amphotericin B binds or sequesters ergosterol-related lipids to exert its fungicidal activity.

    “AMB binds or sequesters ergosterol-related lipids to exert its fungicidal activity46,47.”
  • Fluconazole does not have an antifungal effect as strong as amphotericin B.

    “Fluconazole does not have an antifungal effect as strong as amphotericin B, the latter which destroys the cell membrane through extracting ergosterol from lipid bilayers and is fungicidal.”

    From The synthesis, regulation, and functions of sterols in<i>Candida albicans</i>: Well-known but still lots to learn (2016) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Abstract describes amphotericin B as a powerful antifungal that kills yeast by extracting ergosterol from lipid bilayers. It does not compare its antifungal effect with fluconazole; searches for fluconazole and for an azole-versus-amphotericin comparison found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Katzung BG Masters SB Trevor AJ Basic and Clinical Pharmacology 2012 12th edn Europe McGraw-Hill Education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, T. M., Clay, M. C., Cioffi, A. G., Diaz, K. A., Hisao, G. S., Tuttle, M. D., Nieuwkoop, A. J., Comellas, G., Maryum, N., Wang, S., Uno, B. E., Wildeman, E. L., Gonen, T., Rienstra, C. M., & Burke, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rienstra, Chad M
  • Burke, Martin D
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2014-03-30
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
400-406
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2139472183
Cited by
528
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 11
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM080436)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F30DK081272)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
amphotericin, ergosterol, fungal membranes, antifungal mechanism, yeast cell death, membrane permeabilization, sterol extraction, ion channel models
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Lipid Bilayers, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Permeability, Sterols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review