Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective molecular imaging of viable cancer cells with pH-activatable fluorescence probes

Open access
Urano, Yasuteru, Asanuma, Daisuke, Hama, Yukihiro, Koyama, Yoshinori, Barrett, Tristan, Kamiya, Mako, Nagano, Tetsuo, Watanabe, Toshiaki, Hasegawa, Akira, Choyke, Peter L, Kobayashi, Hisataka·2009·Nature Medicine

Abstract

A long-term goal of cancer diagnosis is to develop tumor-imaging techniques that have sufficient specificity and sensitivity. To achieve this goal, minimizing the background signal originating from nontarget tissues is crucial. Here we achieve highly specific in vivo cancer visualization by using a newly designed targeted 'activatable' fluorescent imaging probe. This agent is activated after cellular internalization by sensing the pH change in the lysosome. Novel acidic pH–activatable probes based on the boron-dipyrromethene fluorophore were synthesized and then conjugated to a cancer-targeting monoclonal antibody. As proof of concept, ex vivo and in vivo imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2–positive lung cancer cells in mice was performed. The probe was highly specific for tumors with minimal background signal. Furthermore, because the acidic pH in lysosomes is maintained by the energy-consuming proton pump, only viable cancer cells were successfully visualized. The design concept can be widely adapted to cancer-specific, cell surface–targeting molecules that result in cellular internalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.1854

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Urano, Y., Asanuma, D., Hama, Y., Koyama, Y., Barrett, T., Kamiya, M., Nagano, T., Watanabe, T., Hasegawa, A., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2008-12-07
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
104-109
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2070802503
Cited by
801
References
0
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.