Cited by 1,845

MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells

Ebert, Margaret S, Neilson, Joel R, Sharp, Phillip A·2007·Nature Methods

Abstract

MicroRNAs are predicted to regulate thousands of mammalian genes, but relatively few targets have been experimentally validated and few microRNA loss-of-function phenotypes have been assigned. As an alternative to chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides, we developed microRNA inhibitors that can be expressed in cells, as RNAs produced from transgenes. Termed 'microRNA sponges', these competitive inhibitors are transcripts expressed from strong promoters, containing multiple, tandem binding sites to a microRNA of interest. When vectors encoding these sponges are transiently transfected into cultured cells, sponges derepress microRNA targets at least as strongly as chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides. They specifically inhibit microRNAs with a complementary heptameric seed, such that a single sponge can be used to block an entire microRNA seed family. RNA polymerase II promoter (Pol II)-driven sponges contain a fluorescence reporter gene for identification and sorting of sponge-treated cells. We envision the use of stably expressed sponges in animal models of disease and development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth1079

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miR-132-S efficiently inhibited miR-132 function by chelating miR-132.

    “The sponge contained ten repeats of the miR-132 antisense sequence and efficiently inhibited miR-132 function by chelating miR-132 (Supplementary information, Figure S6; P < 0.001)31.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebert, M. S., Neilson, J. R., & Sharp, P. A.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2007-08-12
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
721-726
ISSN
  • 1548-7091
  • 1548-7105
Cited by
1,845
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review