Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes

Open access
Moura, Alexandra, Criscuolo, Alexis, Pouseele, Hannes, Maury, Mylène M., Leclercq, Alexandre, Tarr, Cheryl, Björkman, Jonas T., Dallman, Timothy, Reimer, Aleisha, Enouf, Vincent, Larsonneur, Elise, Carleton, Heather, Bracq-Dieye, Hélène, Katz, Lee S., Jones, Louis, Touchon, Marie, Tourdjman, Mathieu, Walker, Matthew, Stroika, Steven, Cantinelli, Thomas, Chenal-Francisque, Viviane, Kucerova, Zuzana, Rocha, Eduardo P. C., Nadon, Celine, Grant, Kathie, Nielsen, Eva M., Pot, Bruno, Gerner-Smidt, Peter, Lecuit, Marc, Brisse, Sylvain·2016·Nature Microbiology
DOI 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) is a major human foodborne pathogen. Numerous Lm outbreaks have been reported worldwide and associated with a high case fatality rate, reinforcing the need for strongly coordinated surveillance and outbreak control. We developed a universally applicable genome-wide strain genotyping approach and investigated the population diversity of Lm using 1,696 isolates from diverse sources and geographical locations. We define, with unprecedented precision, the population structure of Lm, demonstrate the occurrence of international circulation of strains and reveal the extent of heterogeneity in virulence and stress resistance genomic features among clinical and food isolates. Using historical isolates, we show that the evolutionary rate of Lm from lineage I and lineage II is low (∼2.5 × 10−7 substitutions per site per year, as inferred from the core genome) and that major sublineages (corresponding to so-called ‘epidemic clones’) are estimated to be at least 50–150 years old. This work demonstrates the urgent need to monitor Lm strains at the global level and provides the unified approach needed for global harmonization of Lm genome-based typing and population biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Moura, A., Criscuolo, A., Pouseele, H., Maury, M. M., Leclercq, A., Tarr, C., Björkman, J. T., Dallman, T., Reimer, A., Enouf, V., Larsonneur, E., Carleton, H., Bracq-Dieye, H., Katz, L. S., Jones, L., Touchon, M., Tourdjman, M., Walker, M., Stroika, S., Cantinelli, T., Chenal-Francisque, V., Kucerova, Z., Rocha, E. P. C., Nadon, C., Grant, K., Nielsen, E. M., Pot, B., Gerner-Smidt, P., Lecuit, M., & Brisse, S.
Venue
Nature Microbiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-10-10
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
16185-16185
ISSN
2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185
OpenAlex
W2530546106
Cited by
668
References
64
FWCI
44.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.