CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Joining the quantum state of two photons into one

Vitelli, Chiara, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Aparo, Lorenzo, Sciarrino, Fabio, Santamato, Enrico, Marrucci, Lorenzo·2013·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/nphoton.2013.107
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2013.107

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For three photons, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour.

    “For three photons for example, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour [146][147][148].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [146]

    The ‘Quantum state fusion in photons’ passages describe a three-photon fusion apparatus, while ‘Additional information’ models imperfect indistinguishability between three photons. Neither states that an additional collective phase is required to describe three-photon scattering; searches for that phase and for a triad phase found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bennett, C. H. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum information and computation. Nature 404, 247–255 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  2. O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vucković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Straupe, S. & Kulik, S. Quantum optics: the quest for higher dimensionality. Nature Photon. 4, 585–586 (2010). · DOI
  4. Pile, D. How many bits can a photon carry? Nature Photon. 6, 14–15 (2012). · DOI
  5. Yao, X. C. et al. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nature Photon. 6, 225–228 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Mair, A., Alipasha, V., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Molina-Terriza, G., Torres, J. P. & Torner, L. Twisted photons. Nature Phys. 3, 305–310 (2007). · DOI
  9. Lanyon, B. P. et al. Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Nature Phys. 5, 134–140 (2009). · DOI
  10. Ceccarelli, R., Vallone, G., De Martini, F., Mataloni, P. & Cabello, A. Experimental entanglement and nonlocality of a two-photon six-qubit cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160401 (2009). · DOI
  11. Nagali, E. et al. Experimental optimal cloning of four-dimensional quantum states of photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 73602 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gao, W. B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nature Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dada, A. C., Leach, J., Buller, G. S., Padgett, M. J. & Andresson, E. Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nature Phys. 7, 677–680 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Pittman, T. B., Jacobs, B. C. & Franson, J. D. Probabilistic quantum logic operations using polarizing beam splitters. Phys. Rev. A 64, 062311 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zhao, Z. et al. Experimental demonstration of a nondestructive controlled-not quantum gate for two independent photon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 030501 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Munro, W. J., Stephens, A. M., Devitt, S. J., Harrison, K. H. & Nemoto, K. Quantum communication without the necessity of quantum memories. Nature Photon. 6, 777–781 (2012). · DOI
  17. Julsgaard, B., Sherson, J., Cirac, J. I., Fiurasek, J. & Polzik, E. S. Experimental demonstration of quantum memory for light. Nature 432, 482–486 (2004). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vitelli, C., Spagnolo, N., Aparo, L., Sciarrino, F., Santamato, E., & Marrucci, L.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-05-05
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
521-526
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/nphoton.2013.107
Cited by
72
References
14
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review