The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical magnetometry
Open accessAbstract
Some of the most sensitive methods of measuring magnetic fields utilize interactions of resonant light with atomic vapor. Recent developments in this vibrant field are improving magnetometers in many traditional areas such as measurement of geomagnetic anomalies and magnetic fields in space, and are opening the door to new ones, including, dynamical measurements of bio-magnetic fields, detection of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI), inertial-rotation sensing, magnetic microscopy with cold atoms, and tests of fundamental symmetries of Nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684
Single tone parameter estimation from discrete-time observations
Rife, D., & Boorstyn, R. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1974.1055282 · Cited by 1,930
A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer
Kominis, I. K., Kornack, T. W., Allred, J. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01484 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citation1fnoise and other slow, nonexponential kinetics in condensed matter
Weissman, M. B. (1988) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.60.537 · Cited by 1,370
Improved Experimental Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron
Baker, C. A., Doyle, D. D., Geltenbort, P., Green, K., van der Grinten, M. G. D., Harris, P. G., Iaydjiev, P., Ivanov, S. N., May, D. J. R., Pendlebury, J. M., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.131801 · Cited by 1,311
High-Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Unaffected by Spin-Exchange Relaxation
Allred, J. C., Lyman, R. N., Kornack, T. W., & Romalis, M. V. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationElectric dipole moments as probes of new physics
Pospelov, M., & Ritz, A. (2005) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.002 · Cited by 966
Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms
Budker, D., Gawlik, W., Kimball, D. F., Rochester, S. M., Yashchuk, V. V., & Weis, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1153 · Cited by 809
Self-citationKastler, A. (1950) · Journal de Physique et le Radium · doi:10.1051/jphysrad:01950001106025500 · Cited by 618
Nuclear Spin Gyroscope Based on an Atomic Comagnetometer
Kornack, T. W., Ghosh, R. K., & Romalis, M. V. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.230801 · Cited by 565
Self-citation
Cited by
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry
Barry, J. F., Schloss, J. M., Bauch, E., Turner, M. J., Hart, C. A., Pham, L. M., & Walsworth, R. L. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015004 · Cited by 1,247
Ultrahigh sensitivity magnetic field and magnetization measurements with an atomic magnetometer
Dang, H. B., Maloof, A. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3491215 · Cited by 891
Self-citationOptical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond
Barry, J. F., Turner, M. J., Schloss, J. M., Glenn, D. R., Song, Y., Lukin, M. D., Park, H., & Walsworth, R. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1601513113 · Cited by 637
Kitching, J. (2018) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5026238 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Budker, D., & Romalis, M.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 227-234
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2766839228
- Cited by
- 1,916
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 27.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical magnetometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys566
- The paper
- Budker, D., & Romalis, M. (2007). Optical magnetometry. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
