Cited by 63Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

D-Cycloserine Facilitates Extinction the First Time but not the Second Time: An Examination of the Role of NMDA Across the Course of Repeated Extinction Sessions

Langton, Julia M, Richardson, Rick·2008·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Extinction of learned fear is facilitated by the partial NMDA agonist D-cycloserine (DCS). However, some studies suggest that the involvement of NMDA in learning differs depending on whether learning is for the first or second time. The current study aimed to extend these findings by examining the role of NMDA in extinction for the first and the second time. Specifically, the present series of experiments used Pavlovian fear conditioning and extinction paradigms to compare the effect of DCS on extinction of fear to a light CS the first and second time around. As found previously, DCS facilitated extinction of learned fear (Experiment 1). A novel finding, however, was that DCS did not facilitate the re-extinction of fear to this same CS following retraining (Experiments 2A and 2B). Finally, it was demonstrated that the transition from NMDA-dependent to NMDA-independent extinction was stimulus specific (Experiment 3). That is, rats were first trained to fear a CS (light); this fear was then extinguished. Following this, rats were then retrained to fear the same CS (light) or a new CS (white noise). When given a second extinction session, DCS was found to facilitate extinction of the new CS but not the original CS. The results of this series of experiments suggest that the role of NMDA in extinction depends on whether extinction is new learning (first extinction) or retrieval of a previous extinction memory (re-extinction).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2008.32

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langton, J. M., & Richardson, R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Langton, Julia M
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2008-03-19
Volume
33
Issue
13
Pages
3096-3102
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2126343655
Cited by
63
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of New South Wales
  • Australian Research Council (DP0666953)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
D-cycloserine, NMDA receptor, fear extinction, fear conditioning, stimulus specificity, rats
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Conditioning, Psychological, Cycloserine, Disease Models, Animal, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reflex, Startle, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review