Cited by 44Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cue exposure and response prevention with heavy smokers: a laboratory-based randomised placebo-controlled trial examining the effects of D-cycloserine on cue reactivity and attentional bias

Abstract

Rationale Treatments based on exposure/response prevention (Exp/RP) produce only modest benefits in substance dependence disorders. However, a new strategy, which has shown promise in animal models of addiction involves combining Exp/RP with extinction-enhancing pharmacological treatments. A prototype of the latter is D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist at the glycine site of the NMDA receptor.Methods In a laboratory-based randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with non-treatment-seeking heavy smokers (n = 32), we examined the efficacy of Exp/RP combined with DCS (125 mg). Two sessions of Exp/RP were carried out during which cue reactivity was monitored. Effects on attentional bias and/or subjective craving and smoking behaviour were also evaluated after at least 48 h and 2 weeks following session 2 of Exp/RP.Results Within- and between-session reductions in cue reactivity were observed in both treatment groups, although the DCS group did not show an enhanced reduction by the end of session 2. However, a subtle effect of DCS on the emotionality subscale of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire was observed, with a trend towards a sustained reduction in this aspect of craving at 2-week follow-up.Conclusion Our findings suggest that two sessions of Exp/RP combined with DCS does not enhance the reduction in episodic cue reactivity in non-treatment seeking smokers. A trend towards a greater sustained reduction in the emotionality scale of the TCQ in the DCS group suggests that further detailed study of the effects of combined Exp/RP-DCS on different aspects of craving is warranted, especially in smokers with a current intention to quit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-011-2571-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ordinary extended cue exposure has limited effects on smoking-related cue reactivity (subjective craving and physiological responding), even when combined with drugs that ostensibly enhance extinction learning.

    “‘ordinary’ extended cue exposure has limited effects on smoking-related cue reactivity (subjective craving and physiological responding), even when combined with drugs that ostensibly enhance extinction learning (e.g. Kamboj et al. 2012).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RD (1970) STAI Manual. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kamboj, S. K., Joye, A., Das, R. K., Gibson, A. J. W., Morgan, C. J. A., & Curran, H. V.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kamboj, Sunjeev K.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-11-22
Volume
221
Issue
2
Pages
273-284
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2105465456
Cited by
44
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
D-cycloserine, cue exposure, response prevention, cue reactivity, attentional bias, smoking, nicotine craving, NMDA receptor glycine site, heavy smokers, tobacco dependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cues, Cycloserine, Double-Blind Method, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Time Factors, Smoking Cessation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review