Evaluation of genetic demultiplexing of single-cell sequencing data from model species
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Single-cell sequencing (sc-seq) provides a species agnostic tool to study cellular processes. However, these technologies are expensive and require sufficient cell quantities and biological replicates to avoid artifactual results. An option to address these problems is pooling cells from multiple individuals into one sc-seq library. In humans, genotype-based computational separation (i.e., demultiplexing) of pooled sc-seq samples is common. This approach would be instrumental for studying non-isogenic model organisms. We set out to determine whether genotype-based demultiplexing could be more broadly applied among species ranging from zebrafish to non-human primates. Using such non-isogenic species, we benchmark genotype-based demultiplexing of pooled sc-seq datasets against various ground truths. We demonstrate that genotype-based demultiplexing of pooled sc-seq samples can be used with confidence in several non-isogenic model organisms and uncover limitations of this method. Importantly, the only genomic resource required for this approach is sc-seq data and a de novo transcriptome. The incorporation of pooling into sc-seq study designs will decrease cost while simultaneously increasing the reproducibility and experimental options in non-isogenic model organisms.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
SNP-based genetic demultiplexing can accurately separate pooled single-cell/single-nucleus RNA-seq samples from diverse model species, including zebrafish, African green monkey, axolotl, Xenopus, and salamanders, often without a common SNP VCF or a high-quality genome. The approach fails in highly inbred mice and has variable heterotypic doublet detection, so the authors recommend pilot validation and combining SNP-based with transcriptomic doublet detection.
Key findings
- In silico pooled datasets were demultiplexed with high accuracy: 99–100% of zebrafish cells, 95–99% of axolotl cells, and comparable African green monkey cells were correctly assigned by souporcell; souporcell, Vireo, and Freemuxlet gave highly concordant results, while scSplit diverged for one zebrafish individual.
- Heterotypic doublet detection was the largest discrepancy: souporcell identified 55% of synthetic heterotypic true doublets in the three-zebrafish pool, 82% in a five-monkey pool, and 66% in a three-monkey pool, suggesting sample number affects doublet detection efficiency.
- SNP-based demultiplexing failed in highly inbred mice: 99.7% of cells were unassigned for both C57BL/6 and DBA/1J in silico pools; successful datasets had SNP densities of 0.34/kb (axolotl), 0.86/kb (African green monkey), and 3.57/kb (zebrafish), whereas inbred mouse strains had 0.013 and 0.19 SNPs/kb, implying a possible minimum of 0.2–0.34 SNPs/kb.
- In experimentally pooled data, souporcell agreed with orthogonal labels on 86–92% of Xenopus cells, 78–93% of Pleurodeles cells, and 73–96% of CMO-labeled salamander cells; in a 30-zebrafish pool, souporcell assigned 95.1% of 25,279 cells, reported an 18.6% doublet rate versus an expected ~20%, and identified all 30 embryos with 275–1,517 cells per individual.
Methods
- The authors benchmarked SNP-based demultiplexers (souporcell, Vireo, Freemuxlet, scSplit) on published and newly generated scRNA-seq/snRNA-seq datasets from zebrafish, African green monkey, axolotl, inbred mice, Xenopus laevis, Pleurodeles waltl, and Notophthalmus viridescens, using in silico pooling of individually sequenced samples and experimentally pooled cells.
- Ground truths came from individual sample origin, fluorescent transgenic markers, lipid/CMO hashing, or barnyard species mapping; souporcell was selected for deeper testing because it required the fewest inputs and worked with de novo transcriptomes and without a VCF.
- Analyses used Cell Ranger, Demuxafy singularity containers, Seurat/MULTIseqDemux in R, Python notebooks for read-depth and assignment benchmarking, and VCFtools for SNP density calculations.
Limitations
- The paper states that in silico pooling is less challenging than experimentally pooled data because it lacks ambient RNA and real heterotypic doublets, and that the 30-zebrafish pool lacked an orthogonal ground truth, so those large-pool assignments could not be validated.
- The authors state that doublet detection by SNP-based demultiplexers was variable and that it is unclear whether souporcell over-assigns doublets in some experimental datasets; they recommend combining SNP-based and transcriptomic doublet detection.
- The paper states that the exact SNP density cutoff is not quantitatively established and recommends pilot experiments with a secondary demultiplexing method or in silico pooling; it also notes that highly inbred animals are incompatible with SNP-based demultiplexing.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
34 of 43 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
DBA/1J mice have ∼5 × 10^6 total SNPs and indels.
“We also attempted SNP-based demultiplexing of in silico–pooled data from DBA/1J mice (Shinozaki et al, 2022) which have ∼5 × 106 total SNPs and indels (Doran et al, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Doran et al, 2016 source
Table 1 in “Identification of SNPs and indels” reports 5,129,920 SNPs and 955,621 indels for DBA/1J. That is approximately 6.1 million combined; the cited figure of approximately 5 million counts the SNPs alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A recent study collected single animal scRNA-seq datasets from the thymus of zebrafish.
“A recent study collected single animal scRNA-seq datasets from the thymus of zebrafish (Rubin et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubin et al, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
The lack of biological replicates is a major cause of false discoveries in scRNA-seq.
“This is a serious drawback as the lack of biological replicates has also been shown to be a major cause of false discoveries (Hicks et al, 2018; Squair et al, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A published dataset of Xenopus laevis scRNA-seq data contains eight experimentally pooled samples from three Xenopus transgenic lines that each overexpress a different fluorescent gene.
“We analyzed a published dataset of Xenopus laevis scRNA-seq data containing eight experimentally pooled samples from three Xenopus transgenic lines that each overexpress a different fluorescent gene (Lin et al, 2021) (Fig 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin et al, 2021 source
The STAR★Methods (Method details; page unavailable) describe Xenopus scRNA-seq data with two three-sample blastema pools and a two-sample limb-bud/mature-tissue pool, accounting for eight pooled sample preparations. They say the three animal batches in the blastema pools each expressed a different fluorescent color signal, but do not establish that all eight samples came from only three transgenic lines or that each line overexpressed a different fluorescent gene. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
SNP-based demultiplexing was unsuccessful on an in silico-pooled mixture of three C57BL/6 mice samples, with 99.7% of cells being unassigned by souporcell or Vireo.
“Our efforts to apply SNP-based demultiplexing to an in silico–pooled mixture of three C57BL/6 mice samples (Crowl et al, 2022) were unsuccessful, with 99.7% of cells being unassigned by souporcell or Vireo (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Crowl et al, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Low detection of fluorescent gene transcripts is a common problem when using fluorescent marker genes for demuxing pooled data.
“This low detection of fluorescent gene transcripts is a common problem when using fluorescent marker genes for demuxing pooled data (Lin et al, 2021) and underscores the importance of alternative means to demultiplex pooled data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin et al, 2021 source
The STAR★Methods section, under “Identifying samples in pooled scRNA-seq,” reports that weak expression of some fluorescent markers caused poor detection and hampered sample assignment in this study. It does not establish that low detection is a common problem across pooled datasets. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
C57BL/6 mice are nearly genetically identical with only ∼15,000 SNPs and insertion-deletion mutations (indels).
“C57BL/6 mice are nearly genetically identical with only ∼15,000 SNPs and insertion–deletion mutations (indels) (Doran et al, 2016), providing evidence that SNP-based demuxers are unable to separate biological replicates from highly inbred mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Doran et al, 2016 source
The Results and discussion section (‘Novel and private variation’; page unavailable) describes very little private variation in C57BL/10J compared with the C57BL/6J reference, supporting the general point that these related strains are genetically similar. But ‘Identification of SNPs and indels’ reports 349,702 SNPs and 83,930 indels for that comparison, not approximately 15,000, and does not establish that figure for C57BL/6 mice or biological replicates. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
SNP-based demultiplexers are unable to separate samples within the same mouse strain.
“These findings are in line with other claims that SNP-based demultiplexers are unable to separate samples within the same mouse strain (Mylka et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mylka et al, 2022 source
The Discussion says the SNP-based tool freemuxlet fails to separate C57BL6N from C57BL6J, two closely related but distinct mouse strains. It does not directly report testing samples within the same strain, and its observation about freemuxlet does not establish that all SNP-based demultiplexers are unable to separate them. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens.
“Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens (Boedigheimer et al, 2008; Schokker et al, 2015; Paunovska et al, 2018; Reid et al, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Boedigheimer et al, 2008 source
The Results (Variability analysis; page unavailable) report gene-expression differences between control animals, and the Background notes earlier studies of individual-animal variability. But this paper examines rat liver and kidney, not immune cells, and the cited passages do not establish that such variability has been observed for decades or link it to animals encountering different stressors or pathogens. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Schokker et al, 2015 source
The Results (Transcriptomic analyses; page not provided) report substantial variation within treatment groups in intestinal-tissue gene expression in pigs. The Discussion (Comparison of gene expression in intestinal tissues between treatment groups; page not provided) also reports treatment-related differences in immune processes. The paper does not establish that such variability has been observed for decades, occurs in many tissues or specifically in immune cells, or is expected after pathogen exposure. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Paunovska et al, 2018 source
The Introduction discusses changes in gene expression when cells are cultured, not variation between animals. The Animal Experiments section describes the mice used, but neither it nor the searched passages addresses whether stressors or pathogens cause animal-to-animal differences in gene expression, particularly in immune cells. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A thorough benchmarking in human samples of transcriptional and SNP-based doublet detectors suggest that an intersectional approach to doublet detection is superior to any one single method.
“In line with this, a thorough benchmarking in human samples of transcriptional and SNP-based doublet detectors suggest that an intersectional approach to doublet detection is superior to any one single method (Neavin et al, 2022 Preprint).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Neavin et al, 2022 Preprint source
- Premisecitation
Multiple independent programs designed specifically for doublet detection using transcriptomic instead of genotypic information are available for scRNA-seq data including DoubletDetection, Solo, and Scds.
“Multiple independent programs designed specifically for doublet detection using transcriptomic instead of genotypic information are available for scRNA-seq data including DoubletDetection (Gayoso & Shor, 2022), Solo (Bernstein et al, 2020), and Scds (Bais & Kostka, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
SNP-based demuxers can successfully demultiplex single-nuclei RNA-seq and scRNA-seq datasets without any prior information about the samples and with only a de novo transcriptome as a reference.
“We found that SNP-based demuxers can successfully demultiplex single-nuclei RNA-seq and scRNA-seq datasets without any prior information about the samples and with only a de novo transcriptome as a reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most available SNP-based demultiplexing programs are highly accurate on model organism datasets.
“We benchmarked available SNP-based demultiplexing programs and found that most are highly accurate on model organism datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both inbred mouse strains had less than 0.2 SNPs/kilobase (0.013 for C57BL/6 and 0.19 for DBA1/J).
“We found that both inbred mouse strains had less than 0.2 SNPs/kilobase (kb) (0.013 and 0.19 for C57BL/6 and DBA1/J, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Souporcell failed to identify a large proportion of the synthetic heterotypic doublets in the axolotl dataset.
“Similar to the three sample zebrafish datasets, we found that souporcell failed to identify a large proportion of the synthetic heterotypic doublets (Fig S5C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
Compared with demultiplexing of three zebrafish samples, the doublet detection observed with the pool of five monkey samples was improved (82% versus 55%).
“Compared with demultiplexing of three zebrafish samples, the doublet detection observed with this pool of five monkey samples was improved (82% versus 55%) (Fig 1E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
95-99% of the cells from each individual axolotl dataset were correctly demultiplexed from the pool.
“95–99% of the cells from each individual axolotl dataset were correctly demultiplexed from the pool (Fig S5B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNP-based demultiplexing of the synthetically pooled zebrafish scRNA-seq data was highly accurate, resulting in correct cell assignments of 99-100% of cells based on their known animal origin.
“SNP-based demultiplexing of this synthetically pooled zebrafish scRNA-seq data was highly accurate, resulting in correct cell assignments of 99–100% of cells based on their known animal origin (Fig 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Freemuxlet and Vireo misassigned many of the same doublets as souporcell in the zebrafish dataset.
“Souporcell was not alone in its poor doublet detection performance, with Freemuxlet and Vireo misassigning many of the same doublets as souporcell (Fig S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
Results from demultiplexing the five African green monkey samples closely mirrored the zebrafish dataset in terms of accuracy and similarity of results from independent SNP-based demultiplexing programs.
“Our results from this demultiplexing closely mirrored that of the zebrafish dataset in terms of accuracy and the similarity of results from independent SNP-based demultiplexing programs (Fig S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Souporcell only called 66% of true heterotypic doublets from a pool of three monkey samples.
“We found that souporcell only called 66% of true heterotypic doublets from this pool of three monkey samples (Fig S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
Souporcell missed almost half of the synthetic heterotypic true doublets in the pooled zebrafish dataset.
“We found that souporcell missed almost half of the synthetic heterotypic true doublets in the pooled dataset (Fig 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
There is a strong agreement between souporcell assignments and ground truth animal identities for the synthetically pooled zebrafish data.
“We found a strong agreement between souporcell assignments and ground truth animal identities (Fig 1B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
99.7% of cells from in silico-pooled DBA/1J mice data were unable to be assigned via souporcell.
“Again, 99.7% of cells were unable to be assigned via souporcell (data not shown), suggesting that SNP-based demultiplexing is incompatible with highly inbred animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the zebrafish dataset, the use of the common VCF file had minimal overall effect on the souporcell demultiplexing results, with less than 1% of cell assignments differing (11/1,312 cells).
“We found that for this zebrafish dataset, the use of the common VCF file had minimal overall effect on the souporcell demultiplexing results, with less than 1% of cell assignments differing (11/1,312 cells).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many cells with high CMO reads per cell have relatively low biological reads per cell.
“One important note, it appeared that many cells with high CMO reads per cell have relatively low biological reads per cell (Fig 4B), suggesting that although these cells can be CMO demultiplexed they would be unlikely to provide adequate biological information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Doublet assignments were the biggest discrepancy in the Xenopus experiment.
“As with the in silico experiment, doublet assignments were the biggest discrepancy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
Fluorescent-based and souporcell assignments show a high degree of correlation in the Pleurodeles dataset.
“We found that fluorescent-based and souporcell assignments show a high degree of correlation (Fig 3C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a remarkable similarity in demultiplexing the eight-animal Xenopus dataset with fluorescent and SNP-based methods.
“We observed a remarkable similarity in demultiplexing the eight-animal dataset with these two orthologous methods (Fig 2C–E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
When the two methods disagree, the most prevalent occurrence is "negative" fluorescent-based cell assignments that souporcell assigned to one of the transgenic animals.
“When the two methods disagree, the most prevalent occurrence is “negative” fluorescent–based cell assignments that souporcell assigned to one of the transgenic animals (i.e., the rescue we also found in the Xenopus data).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The dataset of a pool of 30 zebrafish embryos contains 25,279 cells.
“We found this dataset to contain 25,279 cells, which according to the manufacturer would result in ∼20% of droplets being doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a high degree of agreement between fluorescent-based cell assignments and SNP-based assignments from Pleurodeles scRNA-seq data.
“We found a high degree of agreement between fluorescent-based cell assignments and SNP-based assignments from Pleurodeles scRNA-seq data (Fig 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of cells assigned by fluorescent-based demuxing to one of the three transgenic animals, 78-93% were correctly identified by souporcell.
“Of cells assigned by fluorescent-based demuxing to one of the three transgenic animals, 78–93% of those cells were correctly identified by souporcell (Fig 3F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was high agreement between souporcell and fluorescent-based assignments, with souporcell assignment agreement on 86-92% of cells in each sample.
“We found high agreement between the two methods, as demonstrated by the souporcell assignment agreement on 86–92% of cells in each sample (Fig 2F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells with more biological read depth showed improved percent agreement between souporcell- and Cellplex-based assignments.
“Interestingly, we did see that cells with more biological read depth showed improved percent agreement between souporcell- and Cellplex-based assignments, which was not a given because the Cellplex label is a distinct library (Fig S10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the cluster level, there was wide variation in assigned doublets ranging from 0.8 to 30.2% of cells within a cluster.
“At the cluster level, there was wide variation in assigned doublets ranging from 0.8 to 30.2% of cells within a cluster (Fig S7B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Findingown data
The next most common discrepancy between the two demultiplexing approaches were contested doublets, cells labeled as "doublet" by fluorescent-based demuxing, for which souporcell disagrees.
“The next most common discrepancy between the two demultiplexing approaches were contested doublets, cells labeled as “doublet” by fluorescent-based demuxing, for which souporcell disagrees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the Pleurodeles dataset, cells sequenced to a higher depth showed higher agreement between souporcell cell assignments and the fluorescent-based ground truth.
“In this dataset, we observed that cells sequenced to a higher depth showed higher agreement between souporcell cell assignments and the fluorescent-based ground truth, which is expected because both methods should improve with more information (Fig S8I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many cells assigned as "negative" by the fluorescent-based approach could be computationally rescued and assigned a transgenic line by souporcell.
“Furthermore, many cells were assigned as “negative” by the fluorescent-based approach, which could then be computationally rescued and assigned a transgenic line by souporcell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
souporcell sample assignments correlated tightly with CMO-based assignments.
“We found that souporcell sample assignments correlated tightly with CMO-based assignments (Fig 4C–E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
souporcell and scds agreed on 68% of assignments, including singlets and doublets.
“Overall, souporcell and scds agreed on 68% of assignments, including singlets and doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fluorescent-based approach assigns many cells as "negative" (63% of cells pre-filter, 29% of cells after filtering) in the Pleurodeles dataset.
“The fluorescent-based approach assigns many cells as “negative” (63% of cells pre-filter, 29% of cells after filtering) (Figs 3C and S8H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When CMO-based assignments were interpreted as ground truth, the accuracy of souporcell assignments was clear, with 73-96% agreement between the two methods for assignment to the three CMO-based assignments.
“When CMO-based assignments were interpreted as ground truth, the accuracy of souporcell assignments was clear, with 73–96% agreement between the two methods for assignment to the three CMO-based assignments (Fig 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Souporcell gave assignments for 95.1% of cells (24,047 of 25,279) in the 30 zebrafish embryo dataset.
“We applied souporcell to this dataset and found that it gave assignments for 95.1% of cells (24,047 of 25,279).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNP-based demultiplexing and barnyard style analysis showed general agreement in the dual-species pooled salamander dataset.
“To investigate SNP-based assignments and doublets in this dataset, we applied souporcell and a barnyard style analysis to this dataset and found a general agreement between these two approaches (Fig S9A–G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The common assumption that each cluster is composed of cells from all biological replicates held true for nine of the identified 21 clusters in the 30 zebrafish sample, predominantly those with the most cells.
“This assumption held true for nine of the identified 21 clusters in this sample, predominantly those with the most cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The largest difference in assignments between these methods was that souporcell identified many doublets in the data from one CMO-labeled sample.
“The largest difference in assignments between these methods was that souporcell identified many doublets in the data from one CMO-labeled sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SNP-based demultiplexing on a pool of 30 zebrafish samples produced assignments.
“In line with this, we obtained assignments when performing SNP-based demultiplexing on a pool of 30 zebrafish samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One of the eight transgenic animals was almost completely absent from the Xenopus dataset, only displaying dozens of total cells.
“Also of interest, we found that one of the eight transgenic animals was almost completely absent from the dataset, only displaying dozens of total cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We demonstrated the successful SNP-based demuxing of a pooled two-species experiment.
“Finally, though pooling of multiple species into one experiment is not currently commonplace, we demonstrated the successful SNP-based demuxing of a pooled two-species experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We successfully applied SNP-based methods to demultiplex pooled single-cell data from multiple species and a two species mix.
“Overall, we successfully applied SNP-based methods to demultiplex pooled single-cell data from multiple species and a two species mix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The potential for heterogeneity in sample representation across cell clusters can be clearly seen in Figs 3 and S8, where some cell clusters are from one or two of the three individuals present in the pool.
“The potential for heterogeneity in sample representation across cell clusters can be clearly seen in Figs 3 and S8, where some cell clusters are from one or two of the three individuals present in the pool.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our results from synthetic pooled samples saw varied success in heterotypic doublet detection by SNP-based demultiplexers.
“However, our results from synthetic pooled samples saw varied success in heterotypic doublet detection by SNP-based demultiplexers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
souporcell stood out as the only tool that was feasible to use with only a de novo transcriptome and no VCF input.
“This is where souporcell stood out as the only tool that was feasible to use with only a de novo transcriptome and no VCF input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Notophthalmus viridescens has only a de novo transcriptome and no published common SNP VCF file.
- Findingown data
Freemuxlet was successful when inputting the VCF and minimap.bam generated via souporcell when running souporcell without a VCF.
“Important note: as with the zebrafish data, we found that Freemuxlet failed when using the downloaded VCF file but was successful when inputting the VCF and minimap.bam generated via souporcell when running souporcell without a VCF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Freemuxlet failed when using the downloaded VCF file.
“Important note: as with the zebrafish data, we found that Freemuxlet failed when using the downloaded VCF file but was successful when inputting the VCF and minimap.bam generated via souporcell when running souporcell without a VCF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the authors' analysis, the Seurat MULTIseqDemux function works well with data from overexpressed fluorescent gene mRNAs.
“Although the MULTIseqDemux function is written to assign cell identities based on CMO labels, we found that it works well with data from overexpressed fluorescent gene mRNAs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demuxers can facilitate effective experimental design via the demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq data from a vast range of species.
“This suggests that SNP-based demuxers can facilitate effective experimental design via the demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq data from a vast range of species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
scRNA-seq sample pooling followed by genetics-based separation of individuals is an effective means to identify individual samples in a variety of commonly studied species.
“The authors demonstrate that scRNA-seq sample pooling followed by genetics-based separation of individuals is an effective means to identify individual samples in a variety of commonly studied species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sample pooling is an effective means to increase biological replicate throughput while simultaneously decreasing batch effects and costs.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The individually sequenced libraries provide a ground truth for definitive benchmarking of SNP-based assignments.
“Although synthetically pooled data are less challenging for an SNP-based demultiplexing algorithm than experimentally pooled samples, the individually sequenced libraries provide a ground truth for definitive benchmarking of SNP-based assignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demuxers are unable to separate biological replicates from highly inbred mice.
“C57BL/6 mice are nearly genetically identical with only ∼15,000 SNPs and insertion–deletion mutations (indels) (Doran et al, 2016), providing evidence that SNP-based demuxers are unable to separate biological replicates from highly inbred mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The in silico-pooled scRNA-seq setup lacks challenges of physically pooled scRNA-seq data, like ambient RNA and real heterotypic doublets.
“Our previous results with in silico–pooled scRNA-seq data indicated high accuracy of SNP-based demultiplexers, but this setup lacks challenges of physically pooled scRNA-seq data, like ambient RNA and real heterotypic doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-demultiplexing tools struggle with heterotypic doublet detection when only three animals are pooled.
“This suggests that SNP-demultiplexing tools struggle with heterotypic doublet detection when only three animals are pooled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Study design and conductreasoning
In these in silico pools, true doublets can be identified with absolute certainty because we have origin information.
“In these in silico pools, true doublets can be identified with absolute certainty because we have origin information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genetic demultiplexing is a viable means to enable sample pooling and subsequent demultiplexing in zebrafish.
“This suggests that genetic demultiplexing is a viable means to enable sample pooling and subsequent demultiplexing in zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing can be a highly accurate and efficient method for demultiplexing pooled single-cell data from non-human primates.
“Overall, these results indicate that SNP-based demultiplexing can be a highly accurate and efficient method for demultiplexing pooled single-cell data from non-human primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The production of synthetic doublets bolsters the ability to test and validate the accuracy of cell and doublet assignments.
“The production of synthetic doublets bolsters the ability to test and validate the accuracy of cell and doublet assignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The number of samples in a pool contributes to efficiency of heterotypic doublet detection.
“This suggests that the number of samples in a pool contributes to efficiency of heterotypic doublet detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
- Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing is incompatible with highly inbred animals.
“Again, 99.7% of cells were unable to be assigned via souporcell (data not shown), suggesting that SNP-based demultiplexing is incompatible with highly inbred animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing may accurately demultiplex pooled samples in any single-cell compatible organism with genetic heterogeneity.
“These results suggest that SNP-based demultiplexing may accurately demultiplex pooled samples in any single-cell compatible organism with genetic heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A range of 0.2-0.34 SNPs/kb may be the minimum required within a sc-seq dataset for SNP-based demultiplexing.
“Although an exact quantitative analysis of this possible genetic cutoff would be useful, these results imply that a range of 0.2–0.34 SNPs/kb may be the minimum required within a sc-seq dataset for SNP-based demultiplexing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Transcriptional-based doublet detection potentially identifies doublets missed by souporcell and wet laboratory-based approaches.
“This suggests that transcriptional-based doublet detection potentially identifies doublets missed by souporcell and wet laboratory–based approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing is a powerful and near universal method to demultiplex pooled samples.
“Altogether, these data suggest that SNP-based demultiplexing is a powerful and near universal method to demultiplex pooled samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sample pooling is a useful and viable tool for empowering single-cell datasets.
“We demonstrate that sample pooling is a useful and viable tool for empowering single-cell datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The fluorescence-based "negative" assignments are attributed to the low capture of fluorescent gene reads.
“Similar to the Xenopus dataset, we attribute these fluorescence-based “negative” assignments to the low capture of fluorescent gene reads (Figs 3B and C and S8A and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing produces highly accurate demuxing results in numerous species with varying genomic resources and genetic variability.
“We show with numerous species which have varying genomic resources and genetic variability that SNP-based demultiplexing produces highly accurate demuxing results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cells with high CMO reads per cell but low biological reads per cell would be unlikely to provide adequate biological information.
“One important note, it appeared that many cells with high CMO reads per cell have relatively low biological reads per cell (Fig 4B), suggesting that although these cells can be CMO demultiplexed they would be unlikely to provide adequate biological information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based assignments display a high degree of accuracy in a complex, experimentally pooled mixture of Xenopus cells.
“Overall, these results display a high degree of accuracy for SNP-based assignments in a complex, experimentally pooled mixture of Xenopus cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fluorescent-based assignments provide a ground truth for benchmarking souporcell cell assignments.
- Interpretationown data
The heterogeneity of sample representation in different cell clusters highlights the critical need for demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq data.
“The heterogeneity of sample representation in different cell clusters highlights the critical need for demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq data (Fig S8A–C, J, and K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Animal dropout in the Xenopus dataset would not be identified without demultiplexing.
“Although individual animal assignments by souporcell could not be validated, this suggests animal dropout in this dataset that would not be identified without demultiplexing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demuxers display a performance relationship with increased read depth.
“This suggests that SNP-based demuxers do display a performance relationship with increased read depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without demultiplexing, erroneous conclusions on novel cell states or types may arise.
“Without demultiplexing, erroneous conclusions on novel cell states or types may arise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
This analysis of the 30 zebrafish dataset could not be validated because the dataset did not contain a distinct cell-labeling method to enable orthogonal non-SNP-based demultiplexing and thereby a ground truth for comparison.
“This analysis could not be validated because this dataset did not contain a distinct cell-labeling method to enable orthogonal non-SNP–based demultiplexing and thereby a ground truth for comparison.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The Pleurodeles experiment was designed to only contain non-erythroid spleen cells from one individual of each transgenic newt line, making it technically feasible to benchmark souporcell cell assignments for individuals through comparisons to fluorescent-based assignments.
“We designed this experiment to only contain non-erythroid spleen cells from one individual of each transgenic newt line, making it technically feasible to benchmark souporcell cell assignments for individuals through comparisons to fluorescent-based assignments (Fig 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The low number of mapped fluorescent reads in these samples means that a "doublet" assignment by fluorescent-based demuxing likely indicates that a particular cell had one to two counts of two distinct fluorescent genes.
“The low number of mapped fluorescent reads in these samples means that a “doublet” assignment by fluorescent-based demuxing likely indicates that a particular cell had one to two counts of two distinct fluorescent genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These analyses demonstrate high agreement between CMO-based and SNP-based demultiplexing of this data from a notably complex experiment using species with poor genomic resources.
“In general, these analyses demonstrate high agreement between CMO-based and SNP-based demultiplexing of this data from a notably complex experiment using species with poor genomic resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The 30 zebrafish embryo dataset would be considered a superloaded sample as it is over the supported cell recovery recommendations.
“This would be considered a superloaded sample as it is over the supported cell recovery recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Species that do not possess a VCF file can still do the in silico ground truth benchmarking performed in this study.
“This means that species that do not possess a VCF file can still do the in silico ground truth benchmarking we performed in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP demuxing can be performed without resources like a high quality, well annotated genome, or a population-wide common SNP genotypes VCF file.
“Fortunately, we demonstrate that SNP demuxing can be performed without resources like a high quality, well annotated genome, or a population-wide common SNP genotypes VCF file.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Notophthalmus viridescens has only a de novo transcriptome and no published common SNP VCF file.
- Premisecitation
The existence of natural biological variability coupled with technical variability in single-cell methods poses problems for studies without replicates or those that do not demultiplex pooled datasets.
“The existence of this natural biological variability coupled with technical variability in single-cell methods poses problems for studies without replicates or those that do not demultiplex pooled datasets (Hicks et al, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hicks et al, 2018 source
- Interpretationown data
This experiment demonstrates the success of SNP-based demuxing in a particularly challenging scenario.
“Despite these potential challenges, this experiment demonstrates the success of SNP-based demuxing in a particularly challenging scenario, and as more research focuses on cross-species comparisons, this is a clever means to increase sample throughput.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SNP-based demultiplexing in these species is accurate relative to other available demultiplexing approaches.
“Our benchmarking results suggest that SNP-based demultiplexing in these species is accurate relative to other available demultiplexing approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sample number in each pool may directly impact doublet-detection efficiency.
“Our analyses also indicate that sample number in each pool may directly impact doublet-detection efficiency, which should be considered in experimental design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 28
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOutside of human samples, SNP-based demultiplexing has been applied to demultiplex plasmodium samples and across mouse strains.
“Outside of human samples, SNP-based demultiplexing has been applied to demultiplex other species: plasmodium samples, and across mouse strains (Heaton et al, 2020; Mylka et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Heaton et al, 2020 source
The Validation and Benchmarking section reports using souporcell to separate six genetically distinct Plasmodium falciparum strains, supporting the Plasmodium example. The cited paper does not report demultiplexing across mouse strains, so it supports only one of the two examples in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mylka et al, 2022 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA high-quality genome and a common SNP VCF file are available for zebrafish.
“Two useful resources for applying SNP-based demultiplexing are available for zebrafish, a high-quality genome (Howe et al, 2013), and a common SNP variant, variant call format (VCF) file for the species (LaFave et al, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Howe et al, 2013 source
- cites LaFave et al, 2014 source
The LaFave citation is attached to the SNP-file claim, not the genome claim. The paper reports downloadable zebrafish variant information in its Abstract (page not provided), but describes variants identified in the NHGRI-1 line and does not identify a common SNP VCF file for the species. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSNP-based approaches have been benchmarked and shown to be highly effective at separating human samples.
“SNP-based approaches have been benchmarked and shown to be highly effective at separating human samples (Kang et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2019; Heaton et al, 2020; Weber et al, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe African green monkey is a pre-clinically relevant species, with a published genome and SNP variant VCF file available for use.
“The African green monkey is a pre-clinically relevant species, with a published genome (Warren et al, 2015) and SNP variant VCF file available for use (Huang et al, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Warren et al, 2015 source
- cites Huang et al, 2015 source
The Methods (Execution of the sequencing strategy; page not specified) state that SNP genotype data from 721 vervets were deposited in NCBI and are publicly available under BioProject PRJEB7923. This supports the availability of SNP variant data attributed to Huang et al., but our copy does not identify an available file in VCF format. The separate genome citation is to Warren et al. and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA genome and SNP variant VCF file are available for the axolotl, but its large genome provides a distinct challenge when using computational tools.
“A genome (Nowoshilow et al, 2018; Smith et al, 2019) and SNP variant VCF file (Timoshevskaya et al, 2021) are available for the axolotl, but its large genome provides a distinct challenge when using computational tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Nowoshilow et al, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Smith et al, 2019 source
- cites Timoshevskaya et al, 2021 source
The Results (page not provided) say that individual axolotl polymorphisms are accessible through the SalSite genome browser, supporting the availability of SNP variant data. Our copy does not establish that a downloadable VCF file is available. The genome citations are to other papers, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationXenopus is a common laboratory animal that has a published high-quality genome.
“Xenopus is another common laboratory animal that has a published high-quality genome (Session et al, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Session et al, 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe axolotl is an example of an organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time.
“The axolotl is an example of the type of organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time (Gerber et al, 2018; Leigh et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2021; Lust et al, 2022; Ye et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Gerber et al, 2018 source
The Abstract and Summary report that scRNA-seq enabled the first molecular profiling of individual axolotl connective-tissue cells during limb regeneration. The section on the Cre-loxP reporter system also identifies an immune-cell cluster, but the paper focuses on connective-tissue regeneration rather than a cell-level study of immunology. That part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Leigh et al, 2018 source
- cites Rodgers et al, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPooling different mouse strains reportedly does allow for SNP-based demultiplexing.
“Although the vast majority of murine work is performed on a single strain, pooling different strains reportedly does allow for SNP-based demultiplexing (Mylka et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mylka et al, 2022 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Spanish ribbed newt, Pleurodeles waltl, has a high-quality de novo transcriptome and more recently a high-quality genome but no available common SNPs VCF file.
“The Spanish ribbed newt, Pleurodeles waltl, is ar reemerging regenerative model organism, which has a high-quality de novo transcriptome (Matsunami et al, 2019) and more recently a high-quality genome (Brown et al, 2022, Preprint) but no available common SNPs VCF file.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSample pooling can enable scRNA-seq experiments with limited cell quantities and can identify doublets.
“Sample pooling can also enable scRNA-seq experiments with limited cell quantities and can identify doublets which, depending on cell loading, can make up a substantial portion of sequenced droplets (DePasquale et al, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites DePasquale et al, 2019 source
The Introduction says cell hashing can identify doublets and that multiplet frequency rises with greater cell loading. The STAR Methods report a super-loaded dataset with a 22.2% doublet rate. Neither passage says that sample pooling enables scRNA-seq experiments with limited cell quantities. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDemultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq is required to associate metadata with individual samples to account for between sample variation, replicate strengthened differential expression analysis, and confirmation of sample representation across scRNA-seq datasets and cell clusters.
“Demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq is required to associate metadata with individual samples to account for between sample variation, replicate strengthened differential expression analysis, and confirmation of sample representation across scRNA-seq datasets and cell clusters (Squair et al, 2021; Zimmerman et al, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Squair et al, 2021 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Zimmerman et al, 2021 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSouporcell identified 55% of synthetic heterotypic true doublets from the zebrafish dataset, making doublet detection the largest discrepancy in this analysis.
“The relatively poor performance (55% heterotypic true doublets identified) of souporcell at identifying synthetic heterotypic doublets from this zebrafish dataset made doublet detection the largest discrepancy in this analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe computational requirements for the zebrafish dataset were similar between souporcell, Vireo, Freemuxlet, and scSplit, with Freemuxlet finishing the quickest and scSplit requiring the least memory.
“The computational requirements for this dataset were similar between these tools, with Freemuxlet finishing the quickest and scSplit requiring the least memory (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSouporcell, Vireo, and Freemuxlet gave highly concordant results on the synthetically pooled zebrafish data, with scSplit giving divergent assignments for one individual.
“We found that souporcell, Vireo, and Freemuxlet gave highly concordant results, with scSplit giving divergent assignments for one individual (Fig S1A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SNP density of the successfully demultiplexed datasets was higher at 0.34/kb (axolotl), 0.86/kb (African green monkey), and 3.57/kb (zebrafish).
“In comparison to the inbred mouse strains, the SNP density of the successfully demultiplexed datasets was higher at 0.34/kb (axolotl), 0.86/kb (African green monkey), and 3.57/kb (zebrafish).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe fluorescent-based approach succeeded in assigning the Xenopus transgenic line of origin, but the low number of fluorescent gene counts left many cells without sufficient data to make an assignment prediction.
“Although this approach succeeded in assigning the Xenopus transgenic line of origin, the low number of fluorescent gene counts left many cells without sufficient data to make an assignment prediction (Figs 2B and S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll 30 embryos were identified in the final dataset, ranging from 275 to 1,517 cells per individual zebrafish.
“All 30 embryos were identified in this final dataset, ranging from 275 to 1,517 cells per individual zebrafish (Table S2 and Fig S7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe doublet rate reported by souporcell was 18.6%, close to the expected 20%.
“Although this experiment does not have a ground truth to compare with, we found that the doublet rate reported by souporcell was 18.6%, close to the expected 20%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
May combine two claims.
Findingown datascds assigned many doublets not assigned by souporcell and vice versa.
“We found that scds assigned many doublets not assigned by souporcell and vice versa (Fig S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe memory-efficient script allows for pooling without a VCF file.
“In addition, this memory-efficient script allows for pooling without a VCF file, which will be critical for all researchers interested in benchmarking SNP demuxers in organisms without VCF files available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn relation to Cellplex-based assignments, both computational approaches are in high agreement, but assign doublet identities to some Cellplex-based singlet assignments.
“In relation to Cellplex-based assignments, both computational approaches are in high agreement, but assign doublet identities to some Cellplex-based singlet assignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is dramatic variation between individuals in the Pleurodeles splenocyte data, with clusters derived primarily from one animal.
“Furthermore, though these samples were pooled and sequenced as one sample, we find dramatic variation between individuals in the Pleurodeles splenocyte data (i.e., clusters derived from primarily one animal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe other 12 clusters were composed of cells from less than 30 replicates (animals), breaking the common assumption and suggesting a possible source of artifacts in interpreting results from these clusters.
“The other 12 clusters were composed of cells from less than 30 replicates (animals), breaking the common assumption and suggesting a possible source of artifacts in interpreting results from these clusters (Fig S7B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe green monkey libraries had low reads/cell.
“Because of low reads/cell in these libraries, we selected barcodes using Seurat with between 1,000 and 2,000 features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFreemuxlet failed when using the downloaded VCF file but was successful when inputting the VCF and minimap.bam generated via souporcell.
“We found that Freemuxlet failed when using the downloaded VCF file but was successful when inputting the VCF and minimap.bam generated via souporcell when running souporcell without a VCF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe souporcell internal freebayes command failed.
“The remapping and variant calling stages of souporcell were run externally because of problems with timeouts on the remapping process with the large salamander transcriptome, and issues with the souporcell internal freebayes command failing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe modified synth_pool.py script stabilizes memory use throughout the pooling.
“To enable more widespread use, we now stabilized memory use throughout the pooling and added an option (--noregionFile) which can pool in the absence of a VCF file.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe modified synth_pool.py script can produce identical pooled BAM files to the original.
“This script can produce identical pooled BAM files to the original.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe remapping process of souporcell had timeouts with the large salamander transcriptome.
“The remapping and variant calling stages of souporcell were run externally because of problems with timeouts on the remapping process with the large salamander transcriptome, and issues with the souporcell internal freebayes command failing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe modified synth_pool.py script includes a --noregionFile option that can pool in the absence of a VCF file.
“To enable more widespread use, we now stabilized memory use throughout the pooling and added an option (--noregionFile) which can pool in the absence of a VCF file.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe Chlorocebus_sabeus 1.1 assembly did not have an annotation file available.
“This assembly did not have an annotation file available, and we generated a gtf file for this GenBank assembly using minimap2 (Li, 2018) and the below described steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMethods for analyzing pooled data and for enabling the demultiplexing of pooled scRNA-seq samples are varied in concept and accuracy.
“Methods for analyzing pooled data and for enabling the demultiplexing (also known as demuxing) of pooled scRNA-seq samples are varied in concept and accuracy and have been recently reviewed (Zhang et al, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al, 2022 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSNP-based demultiplexing lowers burdens and substantially broadens the use of scRNA-seq to study cellular processes in most organisms.
“This lowers burdens and substantially broadens the use of scRNA-seq to study cellular processes in most organisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSynthetic pooling creates a pooled sample that has cell origin information and synthetic doublets.
“This synthetic pooling creates a pooled sample that has cell origin information and synthetic doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSynthetically pooled data are less challenging for an SNP-based demultiplexing algorithm than experimentally pooled samples.
“Although synthetically pooled data are less challenging for an SNP-based demultiplexing algorithm than experimentally pooled samples, the individually sequenced libraries provide a ground truth for definitive benchmarking of SNP-based assignments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study used a diverse swath of methods, each with unique strengths, to validate the widespread use of SNP-based demultiplexing.
“We used a diverse swath of methods, each with unique strengths, to validate the widespread use of SNP-based demultiplexing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo pieces of evidence point towards the reliability of the 30 zebrafish results: the high accuracy of assignments from all the in silico pooled datasets and that souporcell fails to provide assignments in the inbred mouse datasets.
“Two pieces of evidence point towards the reliability of these results (1) the high accuracy of assignments from all the in silico pooled datasets and (2) that souporcell fails to provide assignments in the inbred mouse datasets (see previous subheading).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAccording to the manufacturer, 25,279 cells would result in ∼20% of droplets being doublets.
“We found this dataset to contain 25,279 cells, which according to the manufacturer would result in ∼20% of droplets being doublets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningWithout a benchmarking assessment from a ground truth derived from a distinct technology, it is uncertain if the 30 zebrafish sample results can be trusted.
“However, without a benchmarking assessment from a ground truth derived from a distinct technology, it is uncertain if these results can be trusted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSouporcell may be a viable means to identify biological replicates in large pools, which will provide informative metadata and enhance analysis for future experiments.
“Altogether, this suggests that souporcell may be a viable means to identify biological replicates in large pools, which will provide informative metadata and enhance analysis for future experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOnly cells that had sufficient read depth and fluorescent gene detection were selected for benchmarking in the Pleurodeles analysis.
“As performed in the Xenopus analysis, we selected only cells that had sufficient read depth and fluorescent gene detection for benchmarking (Figs 3B and S8A–H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningStringent filtering was used to ensure that only cells likely to have accurate origin assignment by the fluorescent gene-based demultiplexing method would be used to benchmark SNP-based demultiplexing.
“To avoid benchmarking results with low-quality cells, stringent filtering was used to ensure that only cells likely to have accurate origin assignment by the fluorescent gene–based demultiplexing method would be used to benchmark SNP-based demultiplexing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataViabilities of non-erythroid cells were 85%, 98.4%, and 91.6% in eBFP, eGFP, and mCherry animals, respectively.
“Viabilities of non-erythroid cells (based on cellular morphology) were 85%, 98.4%, and 91.6% in eBFP, eGFP, and mCherry animals, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe original synth_pool.py script only allowed for pooling in the presence of a VCF file.
“To pool bams, we modified the original synth_pool.py script from Vireo’s GitHub repository which was memory intensive and only allowed for pooling in the presence of a VCF file (https://zenodo.org/record/7929057).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://zenodo.org/record/7929057
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWe removed low quality, low-depth cells for further benchmarking analysis.
“We removed low quality, low-depth cells for further benchmarking analysis and identified which souporcell individual assignments corresponded to each CMO through analyzing the correlation of assignments between the two methods (Fig 4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFreemuxlet may be able to be fed a sample-derived VCF, and this may be more reliable than a low-quality common SNPs VCF file.
“This implies that Freemuxlet may be able to be fed a sample-derived VCF (and that this may be more reliable than a low-quality common SNPs VCF file).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenC. aethiops has a robust VCF file available (European Variation Archive: PRJEB7923) that needs to be used in conjunction with genome assembly Chlorocebus_sabeus 1.1 (GCA_000409795.2).
“C. aethiops has a robust VCF file available (European Variation Archive: PRJEB7923) that needs to be used in conjunction with genome assembly Chlorocebus_sabeus 1.1 (GCA_000409795.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites European Variation Archive: PRJEB7923
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments were carried out according to local and European ethical permits.
“All experiments were carried out in post-metamorphic P. waltl and N. viridescens at Karolinska Institutet and were performed according to local and European ethical permits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe original synth_pool.py script from Vireo's GitHub repository was memory intensive.
“To pool bams, we modified the original synth_pool.py script from Vireo’s GitHub repository which was memory intensive and only allowed for pooling in the presence of a VCF file (https://zenodo.org/record/7929057).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://zenodo.org/record/7929057
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Sample pooling is an effective means to increase biological replicate throughput while simultaneously decreasing batch effects and costs.
“Sample pooling is an effective means to increase biological replicate throughput while simultaneously decreasing batch effects and costs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SNP-based computational approaches are expected to perform well in human samples because of their high genetic diversity and wealth of available genomic resources.
“Relative to laboratory species, SNP-based computational approaches are expected to perform well in human samples because of their high genetic diversity and wealth of available genomic resources.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The presence of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing is a major confounder.
“The presence of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing is a major confounder.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection, so homotypic true doublets can be removed.
“Homotypic true doublets created during synthetic pooling were removed, as souporcell relies on intergenotypic doublet detection.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Assuming the worst-case scenario that souporcell is over-assigning doublets, this is a relatively harmless mistake because standard analysis would subsequently remove these doublets from downstream analysis.
“However, assuming the worst-case scenario: that souporcell is over-assigning doublets, this is a relatively harmless mistake considering that a standard analysis would subsequently remove these doublets from downstream analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fluorescent-based assignments provide a ground truth for benchmarking souporcell cell assignments.
“We designed this experiment to only contain non-erythroid spleen cells from one individual of each transgenic newt line, making it technically feasible to benchmark souporcell cell assignments for individuals through comparisons to fluorescent-based assignments (Fig 3A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Notophthalmus viridescens has only a de novo transcriptome and no published common SNP VCF file.
“Notophthalmus is another salamander species studied for its regenerative capacity but equipped with only a de novo transcriptome and no published common SNP VCF file.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SNP-based demultiplexers can only detect doublets from two different individuals (heterotopic doublets), and the proportion of heterotypic doublets increases with sample number in the pool (e.g., three samples = 66%, four samples = 75%).
“SNP-based demultiplexers can only detect doublets from two different individuals (i.e., heterotopic doublets) which occurs at increasing ratios as sample number in the pool increases (e.g., three samples = 66% heterotypic doublets, four samples 75% heterotypic doublets, etc.).”
The paper relies on this without support.
SNP-based demuxers often struggle when applied to datasets from species with large reference genomes or de novo transcriptomes (which typically have many contigs).
“A secondary hurdle for applying SNP-based demuxers is that these tools often struggle when applied to datasets from species with large reference genomes or de novo transcriptomes (which typically have many contigs).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Batch correction algorithms cannot be used if there are no metadata distinguishing replicates.
“Although a variety of batch correction algorithms are available for single-cell studies (Tran et al, 2020), these cannot be used if there are no metadata distinguishing replicates.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Only the troublet portion of souporcell is capable of detecting heterotypic doublets.
“Note: we only expected the troublet portion of souporcell to be capable of detecting heterotypic doublets, so for downstream analysis of this synthetically pooled data, we removed all homotypic doublets.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure S7B switches the basis of the doublet percentages
MinorThe text describes Figure S7B as showing doublet percentages within clusters, whereas the caption says the percentages are per animal.
“At the cluster level, there was wide variation in assigned doublets ranging from 0.8 to 30.2% of cells within a cluster (Fig S7B).”
“(B) Percent of doublets per animal.”
Figure S7A is cited for cells per animal but describes animals per cluster
MinorThe text cites Figure S7A for the number of cells assigned to each zebrafish, but the caption says panel A shows the number of animals per cluster-a different quantity.
“All 30 embryos were identified in this final dataset, ranging from 275 to 1,517 cells per individual zebrafish (Table S2 and Fig S7A).”
“(A) Number of animals per cluster.”
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SAMtools (Li et al, 2009) was used to index the BAM before running default souporcell pipeline with the barcodes file (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/samples/ GSM5057nnn/GSM5057661/suppl/GSM5057661_107606_Xen_Pool_BL7_ 10_14dpa_barcodes.tsv.gz), X. laevis genome FASTA…”
MethodMatplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…results was carried out in Google Colab notebooks shared below, using Python version 3.7, NumPy version 1.21.6 (Harris et al, 2020), Pandas version 1.3.5 (Reback et al, 2021), Matplotlib version 3.2.2 (Hunter, 2007), SciPy version 1.7.3 (Virtanen et al, 2020), Seaborn version 0.11.2 (Waskom, 2021).”
MethodInfluentialSciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…results was carried out in Google Colab notebooks shared below, using Python version 3.7, NumPy version 1.21.6 (Harris et al, 2020), Pandas version 1.3.5 (Reback et al, 2021), Matplotlib version 3.2.2 (Hunter, 2007), SciPy version 1.7.3 (Virtanen et al, 2020), Seaborn version 0.11.2 (Waskom, 2021).”
MethodInfluentialBEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437 · see citing works
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · Cited by 23,826 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of souporcell demultiplexing results was carried out in Google Colab notebooks shared below, using Python version 3.7, NumPy version 1.21.6 (Harris et al, 2020), Pandas version 1.3.5 (Reback et al, 2021), Matplotlib version 3.2.2 (Hunter, 2007), SciPy version 1.7.3 (Virtanen et al, 2020),…”
MethodInfluentialHarris, C., Millman, K., van der Walt, S., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N., et al. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 17,844 · see citing works
Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data
Hao, Y., Hao, S., Andersen-Nissen, E., Mauck, W. M., Zheng, S., Butler, A., Lee, M. J., Wilk, A. J., Darby, C., Zagar, M., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.12.335331 · Cited by 15,508 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scripts in R (version 4.1.2) primarily using Seurat (version 4.1.0) (Hao et al, 2021) were used to evaluate souporcell cell assignments found in the clusters.tsv file through comparison with known cell identities or cell assignments based on fluorescence, barnyard analysis, or CMO labeling.”
MethodInfluentialTwelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools
Danecek, P., Bonfield, J., Liddle, J., Marshall, J., Ohan, V., Pollard, M., Whitwham, A., Keane, T., McCarthy, S., Davies, R. M., et al. (2021) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · Cited by 15,314 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To merge the BAM outputs, we first used BCFtools (Danecek et al, 2021) to filter, sort, and change chromosomes name in the VCF: bcftools filter –include “MAF ≥ 0.05” -Oz –output Vervet.maf0.05.500KFinal_EVA.vcf.gz Vervet500KFinal_EVA.vcf.gzbcftools sort -Oz Vervet.maf0.05.500KFinal_EVA.vcf.gz -o sorted.”
MethodInfluentialMinimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
Li, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · Cited by 14,807 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This assembly did not have an annotation file available, and we generated a gtf file for this GenBank assembly using minimap2 (Li, 2018) and the below described steps. minimap2 -ax splice:hq -t 10 GCF_000409795.”
MethodCd-hit: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S., & Li, W. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · Cited by 11,175 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Transcripts were clustered with cd-hit-est (Li & Godzik, 2006; Fu et al, 2012). cd-hit-est -o s -d -c 0.98 -i reference_transcripts_v2.fa -p 1 -d 0 -b 3 -”
InfluentialCd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W.-Z., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 10,994 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Transcripts were clustered with cd-hit-est (Li & Godzik, 2006; Fu et al, 2012). cd-hit-est -o s -d -c 0.98 -i reference_transcripts_v2.fa -p 1 -d 0 -b 3 -”
InfluentialSciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2019) · Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository · doi:10.17863/cam.64134 · Cited by 10,460 · see citing works
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826 · see citing works
Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J., Couger, M. B., Eccles, D., Li, B., Lieber, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · Cited by 8,464 · cited 3× · see citing works
“11.0.simg /usr/local/bin/ trinityrnaseq/Analysis/SuperTranscripts/Trinity_gene_splice_ modeler.py –trinity_fasta Trinity_Pwal_v2.fasta –incl_malign – out_prefix out_dir A Notophthalmus de novo transcriptome from the study of Abdullayev et al (2013) was downloaded from https:// sandberglab.se/static/data/papers/redspot…”
Influentialseaborn: statistical data visualization
Waskom, M. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.03021 · Cited by 7,310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…results was carried out in Google Colab notebooks shared below, using Python version 3.7, NumPy version 1.21.6 (Harris et al, 2020), Pandas version 1.3.5 (Reback et al, 2021), Matplotlib version 3.2.2 (Hunter, 2007), SciPy version 1.7.3 (Virtanen et al, 2020), Seaborn version 0.11.2 (Waskom, 2021).”
MethodInfluentialHighly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the last decade, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has exploded in popularity as a species agnostic tool for studying gene expression at the level of individual cells (Klein et al, 2015; Macosko et al, 2015; Villani et al, 2017; Han et al, 2018).”
BackgroundUMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 · Cited by 7,101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“UMAP (McInnes et al, 2018 Preprint) and upset plots (Lex et al, 2014) were generated in R scripts and annotated in Affinity Designer.”
MethodThe zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.
Howe, K., Clark, M. D., Torroja, C. F., Torrance, J., Berthelot, C., Muffato, M., Collins, J. E., Humphray, S., McLaren, K., Matthews, L., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12111 · Cited by 5,100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Two useful resources for applying SNP-based demultiplexing are available for zebrafish, a high-quality genome (Howe et al, 2013), and a common SNP variant, variant call format (VCF) file for the species (LaFave et al, 2014).”
Reback, J., McKinney, W., Bossche, J. V. D., Jbrockmendel, Augspurger, T., Cloud, P., Gfyoung, Sinhrks, Klein, A., Tratner, J., et al. (2019) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 · Cited by 4,025 · see citing works
Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · Cited by 3,356 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the last decade, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has exploded in popularity as a species agnostic tool for studying gene expression at the level of individual cells (Klein et al, 2015; Macosko et al, 2015; Villani et al, 2017; Han et al, 2018).”
BackgroundSingle-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors
Villani, A.-C., Satija, R., Reynolds, G., Sarkizova, S., Shekhar, K., Fletcher, J., Griesbeck, M., Butler, A., Zheng, S., Lazo, S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4573 · Cited by 2,413 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the last decade, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has exploded in popularity as a species agnostic tool for studying gene expression at the level of individual cells (Klein et al, 2015; Macosko et al, 2015; Villani et al, 2017; Han et al, 2018).”
BackgroundUpSet: Visualization of Intersecting Sets
Lex, A., Gehlenborg, N., Strobelt, H., Vuillemot, R., & Pfister, H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346248 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1× · see citing works
“UMAP (McInnes et al, 2018 Preprint) and upset plots (Lex et al, 2014) were generated in R scripts and annotated in Affinity Designer.”
MethodMapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq
Han, X., Wang, R., Zhou, Y., Fei, L., Sun, H., Lai, S., Saadatpour, A., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Ye, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.001 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation
Kang, H. M., Subramaniam, M., Targ, S., Nguyen, M., Maliskova, L., McCarthy, E., Wan, E., Wong, S., Byrnes, L., Lanata, C. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4042 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Tran, H. T. N., Ang, K. S., Chevrier, M., Zhang, X., Lee, N. Y. S., Goh, M., & Chen, J. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1850-9 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although a variety of batch correction algorithms are available for single-cell studies (Tran et al, 2020), these cannot be used if there are no metadata distinguishing replicates.”
BackgroundFUNDAMENTALS OF PLANARIAN REGENERATION
Reddien, P. W., & Alvarado, A. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.095114 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice
Beura, L. K., Hamilton, S. E., Bi, K., Schenkel, J. M., Odumade, O. A., Casey, K. A., Thompson, E. A., Fraser, K. A., Rosato, P. C., Filali-Mouhim, A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17655 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Stoeckius, M., Zheng, S., Houck-Loomis, B., Hao, S., Yeung, B. Z., Mauck, W. M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1603-1 · Cited by 1,046 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most common method for scRNA-seq pooling is cell hashing, in which cells from each sample are labeled with antibodies (Stoeckius et al, 2018), lipids (McGinnis et al, 2019), or chemicals (Gehring et al, 2020) tethered to an oligonucleotide label that links gene expression data from each cell to…”
MethodConfronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression
Squair, J. W., Gautier, M., Kathe, C., Anderson, M. A., James, N. D., Hutson, T. H., Hudelle, R., Qaiser, T., Matson, K. J. E., Barraud, Q., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.12.435024 · Cited by 1,017 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…scRNA-seq is required to associate metadata with individual samples to account for between sample variation, replicate strengthened differential expression analysis, and confirmation of sample representation across scRNA-seq datasets and cell clusters (Squair et al, 2021; Zimmerman et al, 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialSchurch, N. J., Schofield, P., Gierliński, M., Cole, C., Sherstnev, A., Singh, V., Wrobel, N., Gharbi, K., Simpson, G. G., Owen-Hughes, T., et al. (2016) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.053959.115 · Cited by 966 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the coming years, we expect that similar to bulk RNA sequencing (Schurch et al, 2016), increased biological replicates should be prioritized over increased information on one sample in sc-seq studies.”
BackgroundGenome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis
Session, A. M., Uno, Y., Kwon, T., Chapman, J. A., Toyoda, A., Takahashi, S., Fukui, A., Hikosaka, A., Suzuki, A., Kondo, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19840 · Cited by 949 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Xenopus is another common laboratory animal that has a published highquality genome (Session et al, 2016).”
BackgroundMULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices
McGinnis, C. S., Patterson, D. M., Winkler, J., Conrad, D. N., Hein, M. Y., Srivastava, V., Hu, J. L., Murrow, L. M., Weissman, J. S., Werb, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0433-8 · Cited by 643 · cited 5× · see citing works
“To identify the transgenic line origin based on fluorescent mRNA counts, we co-opted MULTIseqDemux (McGinnis et al, 2019) to assign donor identities based on the transgenic line–expressed fluorescent gene counts.”
MethodInfluentialMissing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
Hicks, S. C., Townes, F. W., Teng, M., & Irizarry, R. A. (2018) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators
Nowoshilow, S., Schloissnig, S., Fei, J., Dahl, A., Pang, A. W. C., Pippel, M., Winkler, S., Hastie, A. R., Young, G. R., Roscito, J. G., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25458 · Cited by 538 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A genome (Nowoshilow et al, 2018; Smith et al, 2019) and SNP variant VCF file (Timoshevskaya et al, 2021) are available for the axolotl, but its large genome provides a distinct challenge when using computational tools.”
Souporcell: robust clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data by genotype without reference genotypes
Heaton, H., Talman, A. M., Knights, A., Imaz, M., Gaffney, D. J., Durbin, R., Hemberg, M., & Lawniczak, M. K. N. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0820-1 · Cited by 506 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Outside of human samples, SNP-based demultiplexing has been applied to demultiplex other species: plasmodium samples, and across mouse strains (Heaton et al, 2020; Mylka et al, 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSingle-cell analysis uncovers convergence of cell identities during axolotl limb regeneration
Gerber, T., Murawala, P., Knapp, D., Masselink, W., Schuez, M., Hermann, S., Gac-Santel, M., Nowoshilow, S., Kageyama, J., Khattak, S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0681 · Cited by 415 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The axolotl is an example of the type of organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time (Gerber et al, 2018; Leigh et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2021; Lust et al, 2022; Ye et al, 2022).”
BackgroundMapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq
Han, X., Wang, R., Zhou, Y., Fei, L., Sun, H., Lai, S., Saadatpour, A., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Ye, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.012 · Cited by 384 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the last decade, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has exploded in popularity as a species agnostic tool for studying gene expression at the level of individual cells (Klein et al, 2015; Macosko et al, 2015; Villani et al, 2017; Han et al, 2018).”
BackgroundA practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies
Zimmerman, K. D., Espeland, M. A., & Langefeld, C. D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21038-1 · Cited by 362 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…scRNA-seq is required to associate metadata with individual samples to account for between sample variation, replicate strengthened differential expression analysis, and confirmation of sample representation across scRNA-seq datasets and cell clusters (Squair et al, 2021; Zimmerman et al, 2021).”
BackgroundVireo: Bayesian demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-seq data without genotype reference
Huang, Y., McCarthy, D. J., & Stegle, O. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1865-2 · Cited by 348 · cited 3× · see citing works
“BAM files were merged using synth_pool.py from Vireo (Huang et al, 2019) using the VCF downloaded from (http://ambystoma.uky.edu/hubExamples/hubAssembly/ hub_AmexG_v6/AmexG_v6.hub_data/SNP_vcf_tracks/ddMale_to_ AmexGv6.vcf.gz) which was filtered using BCFtools v1.”
BackgroundMethodscds: computational annotation of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data
Bais, A. S., & Kostka, D. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz698 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Solo: Doublet Identification in Single-Cell RNA-Seq via Semi-Supervised Deep Learning
Bernstein, N. J., Fong, N. L., Lam, I., Roy, M. A., Hendrickson, D. G., & Kelley, D. R. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.05.010 · Cited by 280 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Multiple independent programs designed specifically for doublet detection using transcriptomic instead of genotypic information are available for scRNA-seq data including DoubletDetection (Gayoso & Shor, 2022), Solo (Bernstein et al, 2020), and Scds (Bais & Kostka, 2020).”
MethodPaunovska, K., Sago, C. D., Monaco, C. M., Hudson, W. H., Castro, M. G., Rudoltz, T. G., Kalathoor, S., Vanover, D. A., Santangelo, P. J., Ahmed, R., et al. (2018) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00432 · Cited by 277 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens (Boedigheimer et al, 2008; Schokker et al, 2015; Paunovska et al, 2018; Reid et al, 2018).”
BackgroundDainat, J., Cannoodt, R., Soares, A., García‐Ruano, D., Hereñú, D., Murray, D. K. D., Davis, E. W., Ugrin, I., Crouch, K., Solér, L., et al. (2019) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3552717 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Crowl, J. T., Heeg, M., Ferry, A., Milner, J. J., Omilusik, K. D., Toma, C., He, Z., Chang, J. T., & Goldrath, A. W. (2022) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-022-01229-8 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA-seq reveals hidden transcriptional variation in malaria parasites
Reid, A. J., Talman, A. M., Bennett, H. M., Gomes, A. R., Sanders, M. J., Illingworth, C. J. R., Billker, O., Berriman, M., & Lawniczak, M. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.33105 · Cited by 209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens (Boedigheimer et al, 2008; Schokker et al, 2015; Paunovska et al, 2018; Reid et al, 2018).”
BackgroundDoubletDecon: Deconvoluting Doublets from Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data
DePasquale, E. A. K., Schnell, D. J., Van Camp, P.-J., Valiente-Alandí, Í., Blaxall, B. C., Grimes, H. L., Singh, H., & Salomonis, N. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.082 · Cited by 207 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sample pooling can also enable scRNA-seq experiments with limited cell quantities and can identify doublets which, depending on cell loading, can make up a substantial portion of sequenced droplets (DePasquale et al, 2019).”
BackgroundLeigh, N. D., Dunlap, G. S., Johnson, K., Mariano, R., Oshiro, R., Wong, A. Y., Bryant, D. M., Miller, B. M., Ratner, A., Chen, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07604-0 · Cited by 174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The axolotl is an example of the type of organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time (Gerber et al, 2018; Leigh et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2021; Lust et al, 2022; Ye et al, 2022).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSingle-cell RNA sequencing reveals SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in lungs of African green monkeys
Speranza, E. E., Williamson, B. N., Feldmann, F., Sturdevant, G. L., Pérez-Pérez, L., Meade-White, K. D., Smith, B. J., Lovaglio, J., Martens, C., Munster, V. J., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abe8146 · Cited by 160 · cited 2× · see citing works
“05.vcf Green monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) in silico mixing and demultiplexing Five samples were downloaded from a previously published dataset (Speranza et al, 2021).”
MethodSchokker, D., Zhang, J., Vastenhouw, S. A., Heilig, H. G. H. J., Smidt, H., Rebel, J. M. J., & Smits, M. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116523 · Cited by 142 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens (Boedigheimer et al, 2008; Schokker et al, 2015; Paunovska et al, 2018; Reid et al, 2018).”
Backgroundpandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.0.3
Reback, J., McKinney, W., jbrockmendel, et al. (2020) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3715232 · Cited by 136
A chromosome-scale assembly of the axolotl genome
Smith, J. J., Timoshevskaya, N., Timoshevskiy, V. A., Keinath, M. C., Hardy, D., & Voss, S. R. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.241901.118 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A genome (Nowoshilow et al, 2018; Smith et al, 2019) and SNP variant VCF file (Timoshevskaya et al, 2021) are available for the axolotl, but its large genome provides a distinct challenge when using computational tools.”
SuperTranscripts: a data driven reference for analysis and visualisation of transcriptomes
Davidson, N., Hawkins, A. D. K., & Oshlack, A. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1284-1 · Cited by 131 · cited 4× · see citing works
“14.1 was run: Lace_run.py reference_transcripts_v2.fa info.clusters.txt -t –cores 16 -o Noto_superTrans.”
MethodInfluentialFibroblast dedifferentiation as a determinant of successful regeneration
Lin, T.-Y., Gerber, T., Taniguchi-Sugiura, Y., Murawala, P., Hermann, S., Grosser, L., Shibata, E., Treutlein, B., & Tanaka, E. M. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.016 · Cited by 126 · cited 5× · see citing works
“These methods include pooling cells from transgenic animals expressing a distinct transgene (Lin et al, 2021) or oligonucleotide (Shin et al, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe genome of the vervet (<i>Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus</i>)
Warren, W. C., Jasinska, A. J., García-Pérez, R., Svardal, H., Tomlinson, C., Rocchi, M., Archidiacono, N., Capozzi, O., Minx, P., Montague, M. J., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.192922.115 · Cited by 123 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The African green monkey is a pre-clinically relevant species, with a published genome (Warren et al, 2015) and SNP variant VCF file available for use (Huang et al, 2015).”
BackgroundHighly multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq by DNA oligonucleotide tagging of cellular proteins
Gehring, J., Hwee Park, J., Chen, S., Thomson, M., & Pachter, L. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0372-z · Cited by 122 · see citing works
A Defined Zebrafish Line for High-Throughput Genetics and Genomics: NHGRI-1
LaFave, M. C., Varshney, G. K., Vemulapalli, M., Mullikin, J. C., & Burgess, S. M. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.166769 · Cited by 101 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Two useful resources for applying SNP-based demultiplexing are available for zebrafish, a high-quality genome (Howe et al, 2013), and a common SNP variant, variant call format (VCF) file for the species (LaFave et al, 2014).”
MethodShin, D., Lee, W., Lee, J. H., & Bang, D. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav2249 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These methods include pooling cells from transgenic animals expressing a distinct transgene (Lin et al, 2021) or oligonucleotide (Shin et al, 2019).”
MethodDoran, A. G., Wong, K., Flint, J., Adams, D. J., Hunter, K. W., & Keane, T. M. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1024-y · Cited by 101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“C57BL/6mice are nearly genetically identical with only ~15,000 SNPs and insertion–deletion mutations (indels) (Doran et al, 2016), providing evidence that SNP-based demuxers are unable to separate biological replicates from highly inbred mice.”
BackgroundMethodSingle-cell analyses of axolotl telencephalon organization, neurogenesis, and regeneration
Lust, K., Maynard, A., Gomes, T., Fleck, J. S., Camp, J. G., Tanaka, E. M., & Treutlein, B. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp9262 · Cited by 97 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Axolotl in silico mixing and souporcell demultiplexing FASTQ files from a previously published (Lust et al, 2022) axolotl single-nucleus RNA sequencing dataset were downloaded.”
BackgroundMethodGenotype-free demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-seq
Xu, J., Falconer, C., Nguyen, Q., Crawford, J., McKinnon, B. D., Mortlock, S., Senabouth, A., Andersen, S., Chiu, H. S., Jiang, L., et al. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1852-7 · Cited by 94 · cited 2× · see citing works
“SNP-based approaches have been benchmarked and shown to be highly effective at separating human samples (Kang et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2019; Heaton et al, 2020; Weber et al, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodNeavin, D., Senabouth, A., Hang Lee, J. T., Ripoll, A., sc-eQTLGen Consortium, Franke, L., Prabhakar, S., Ye, C. J., McCarthy, D. J., Melé, M., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.07.483367 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Neavin, D., Senabouth, A., Arora, H., Lee, J. T. H., Ripoll-Cladellas, A., sc-eQTLGen Consortium, Franke, L., Prabhakar, S., Ye, C. J., McCarthy, D. J., et al. (2024) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03224-8 · Cited by 90 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…Demuxafy singularity container, which contains almost all of the demuxers and other required bioinformatic tools, for as many analyses as possible (Neavin et al, 2022 Preprint). singularity exec Demuxafy.sif bcftools filter –include “MAF ≥ 0.05” -Oz –output NHGRI1.maf0.05.danRer11.variant.vcf.gz…”
MethodInfluentialBoedigheimer, M. J., Wolfinger, R. D., Bass, M. B., Bushel, P. R., Chou, J. W., Cooper, M., Corton, J. C., Fostel, J., Hester, S., Lee, J. S., et al. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-285 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Animal-to-animal variability in gene expression patterns has been observed for decades and is expected in many tissues, especially in immune cells, of animals that encounter different stressors or pathogens (Boedigheimer et al, 2008; Schokker et al, 2015; Paunovska et al, 2018; Reid et al, 2018).”
BackgroundGayoso, A., Shor, J. D., Carr, A., et al. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2678041 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Single-cell analyses reveal early thymic progenitors and pre-B cells in zebrafish
Rubin, S. A., Baron, C. S., Pessoa Rodrigues, C., Duran, M., Corbin, A. F., Yang, S. P., Trapnell, C., & Zon, L. I. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20220038 · Cited by 56 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A recent study collected single animal scRNA-seq datasets from the thymus of zebrafish (Rubin et al, 2022).”
BackgroundMethodA reference transcriptome and inferred proteome for the salamander Notophthalmus viridescens
Abdullayev, I., Kirkham, M., Björklund, Å. K., Simon, A., & Sandberg, R. (2013) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.02.013 · Cited by 53 · cited 7× · see citing works
“VCF = ${CurrentAnalysisDir}free.vcf singularity exec ${DemuxSoupDir}Demuxafy.sif souporcell_pipeline.py -i ${CurrentAnalysisDir}minimap_tagged_sorted.bam -b ${BARCODES} -f ${FASTA} -t 20 -o ${OutputName} -k $N –skip_remap SKIP_REMAP –common_variants ${VCF} Pooled Pleurodeles and Notophthalmus mapping and SNP-based dem…”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationComparative analysis of antibody- and lipid-based multiplexing methods for single-cell RNA-seq
Mylka, V., Matetovici, I., Poovathingal, S., Aerts, J., Vandamme, N., Seurinck, R., Verstaen, K., Hulselmans, G., Van den Hoecke, S., Scheyltjens, I., et al. (2022) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02628-8 · Cited by 53 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Outside of human samples, SNP-based demultiplexing has been applied to demultiplex other species: plasmodium samples, and across mouse strains (Heaton et al, 2020; Mylka et al, 2022).”
BackgroundResultMatsunami, M., Suzuki, M., Haramoto, Y., Fukui, A., Inoue, T., Yamaguchi, K., Uchiyama, I., Mori, K., Tashiro, K., Ito, Y., et al. (2019) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsz003 · Cited by 51 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We constructed and aligned to a dual-species index made from the SuperTranscriptome (Abdullayev et al, 2013; Davidson et al, 2017; Matsunami et al, 2019) for each of these species.”
BackgroundMethodHuang, Y. S., Ramensky, V., Service, S. K., Jasinska, A. J., Jung, Y., Choi, O.-W., Cantor, R. M., Juretic, N., Wasserscheid, J., Kaplan, J. R., et al. (2015) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-015-0152-2 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The African green monkey is a pre-clinically relevant species, with a published genome (Warren et al, 2015) and SNP variant VCF file available for use (Huang et al, 2015).”
BackgroundRodgers, A. K., Smith, J. J., & Voss, S. R. (2020) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112149 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The axolotl is an example of the type of organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time (Gerber et al, 2018; Leigh et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2021; Lust et al, 2022; Ye et al, 2022).”
BackgroundEpicardium-derived cells organize through tight junctions to replenish cardiac muscle in salamanders
Eroglu, E., Yen, C. Y. T., Tsoi, Y. L., Witman, N., Elewa, A., Joven, A., Wang, H., Szattler, T., Umeano, C. H., Sohlmér, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00902-2 · Cited by 40 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…one female tgTol2(CAG:Nucbow CAG:Cytbow)Simon (5.67 g weight, 10.8 cm snout-to-tail length) (Joven et al, 2018), one male tgSceI(CAG:loxP-GFP-loxP-Cherry)Simon (5.36 g, 11.1 cm) (Joven et al, 2018), and female tgTol2(CAG:loxP-Cherry-loxP-H2B:YFP)Simon (6.25 g, 10.8 cm) (Eroglu et al, 2022).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSample-multiplexing approaches for single-cell sequencing
Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Wen, Z., Gao, J., Li, S., Weissman, S. M., & Pan, X. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04482-0 · Cited by 40 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A downside to these label-based approaches is that they each have varying degrees of efficiency, require sufficient cell numbers, have costs associated with their application, are not compatible with all species, and have a chance of failing (Zhang et al, 2022).”
BackgroundWeber, L. M., Hippen, A. A., Hickey, P. F., Berrett, K. C., Gertz, J., Doherty, J. A., Greene, C. S., & Hicks, S. C. (2021) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab062 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SNP-based approaches have been benchmarked and shown to be highly effective at separating human samples (Kang et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2019; Heaton et al, 2020; Weber et al, 2021).”
BackgroundSequencing and chromosome-scale assembly of the giant <i>Pleurodeles waltl</i> genome
Brown, T., Elewa, A., Iarovenko, S., Subramanian, E., Araus, A. J., Petzold, A., Suzuki, M., Suzuki, K.-I. T., Hayashi, T., Toyoda, A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.19.512763 · Cited by 37
Self-citationBrown, T., Mishra, K., Elewa, A., Iarovenko, S. I., Subramanian, E., Joven, A., Petzold, A., Fromm, B., Friedländer, M. R., Rikk, L., et al. (2025) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100761 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationCellular basis of brain maturation and acquisition of complex behaviors in salamanders
Joven, A., Wang, H., Pinheiro, T., Hameed, L. S., Belnoue, L., & Simon, A. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.160051 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationHusbandry of Spanish Ribbed Newts (Pleurodeles waltl)
Joven, A., Kirkham, M., & Simon, A. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2495-0_4 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All animals were maintained under standard conditions of 12-h light/12-h darkness at 18–24°C (Joven et al, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSingle-cell transcriptome analysis of the zebrafish embryonic trunk
Metikala, S., Chetty, S. C., & Sumanas, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254024 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A previously published dataset of 30 pooled zebrafish embryos (Metikala et al, 2021) was downloaded from SRA (SRR12067711– SRR12067712) using prefetch followed by fasterq-dump with flags split-files and include-technical.”
BackgroundMethodAstrocytic dysfunction induced by ABCA1 deficiency causes optic neuropathy
Shinozaki, Y., Leung, A., Namekata, K., Saitoh, S., Nguyen, H. B., Takeda, A., Danjo, Y., Morizawa, Y. M., Shigetomi, E., Sano, F., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq1081 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We also attempted SNP-based demultiplexing of in silico–pooled data from DBA/1J mice (Shinozaki et al, 2022) which have ~5 × 106 total SNPs and indels (Doran et al, 2016).”
MethodInfluentialYe, F., Zhang, G., Weigao, E., Chen, H., Yu, C., Yang, L. X., Fu, Y., Li, J., Fu, S., Sun, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31879-z · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The axolotl is an example of the type of organism for which scRNA-seq has enabled cell level study of regeneration and immunology for the first time (Gerber et al, 2018; Leigh et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2021; Lust et al, 2022; Ye et al, 2022).”
BackgroundAuthor Correction: The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators
Nowoshilow, S., Schloissnig, S., Fei, J., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0141-z · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Timoshevskaya, N., Voss, S. R., Labianca, C. N., High, C. R., & Smith, J. J. (2021) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.257 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Population-scale cross-disorder atlas of the human prefrontal cortex at single-cell resolution
Fullard, J. F., Nm, P., Lee, D., Mathur, D. D., Therrien, K., Hong, A., Casey, C., Shao, Z., Alvia, M., Argyriou, S., et al. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04687-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A multi-region single nucleus transcriptomic atlas of Parkinson’s disease
Prashant, N. M., Fullard, J. F., Clarence, T., Mathur, D. D., Casey, C., Hennigan, E., Alvia, M., Krause-Massaguer, J., Barreda, A., Davis, D. A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-04117-y · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Demultiplexing of single-cell RNA-sequencing data using interindividual variation in gene expression
Nassiri, I., Kwok, A. J., Bhandari, A., Bull, K. R., Garner, L. C., Klenerman, P., Webber, C., Parkkinen, L., Lee, A. W., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae085 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“According to available benchmark studies, vireo out-performs other tools when it comes to demultiplexing pooled single-cell RNA-seq data without genotype reference (Neavin et al. 2024, Cardiello et al. 2023).”
hadge: a comprehensive pipeline for donor deconvolution in single-cell studies
Curion, F., Wu, X., Heumos, L., André, M. M. G., Halle, L., Ozols, M., Grant‐Peters, M., Rich‐Griffin, C., Yeung, H., Dendrou, C. A., et al. (2024) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03249-z · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“All of these tools have been benchmarked in independent publications and are widely used by the scientific community [14, 23, 31, 32].”
MethodDemoTape : Computational demultiplexing of targeted single-cell sequencing dataPreprint
Borgsmüller, N., Kuipers, J., Gawron, J., Roncador, M., Pohly, M. F., Acar, İ. E., Do, T. H. L., Reisenauer, S., Feldkamp, M., Beisel, C., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.06.627152 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Methodologies for Sample Multiplexing and Computational Deconvolution in Single‐Cell Sequencing
Gao, Y., Yin, W., Hu, W., & Chen, W. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202513396 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Benchmarking of computational demultiplexing methods for single-nucleus RNA sequencing data
Fu, Y., Youness, M., Virzì, A., Song, X., Tubeeckx, M. R. L., De Keulenaer, G. W., Heidbuchel, H., Segers, V. F. M., Sipido, K. R., Thienpont, B., et al. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf371 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fiorini, M. R., Amiri, S., Dilliott, A. A., Ohki, C. M. Y., Smigielski, L., Walitza, S., Fon, E. A., Grünblatt, E., Thomas, R. A., & Farhan, S. M. K. (2025) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03643-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Li, T., Alvarez, M., Liu, C., Abuhanna, K. D., Sun, Y., Ernst, J., Plath, K., Balliu, B., Luo, C., & Zaitlen, N. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106769.1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
demuxSNP: supervised demultiplexing single-cell RNA sequencing using cell hashing and SNPs
Lynch, M. P., Wang, Y., Sui, S. H., Gatto, L., & Culhane, A. C. (2024) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae090 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Russo, D. D., Quinn, S. L., Kholod, O., Elovitz, M. A., Lauffenburger, D. A., Sabeti, P. C., Jülg, B. D., Edlow, A. G., Goods, B. A., Shalek, A. K., et al. (2026) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-025-01308-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Recognizing this limitation, we also introduce an optimized pipeline that leverages SMART-seq2 bulk RNA-seq to enable demultiplexing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms that differ between sample donors (‘genetic hashing’) 29,30 .”
demuxSNP: supervised demultiplexing scRNAseq using cell hashing and SNPsPreprint
Lynch, M. P., Wang, Y., Gatto, L., & Culhane, A. C. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.22.590526 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Li, T., Alvarez, M., Liu, C., Abuhanna, K. D., Sun, Y. F., Ernst, J., Plath, K., Balliu, B., Luo, C., & Zaitlen, N. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.06.636969 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sserwadda, H., Lee, J. H., Lee, B. H., Jung, S.-Y., Bang, Y. J., Cho, B. K., Nam, H. J., Choi, S., Gong, J., Choi, H. S., et al. (2025) · Immunological Investigations · doi:10.1080/08820139.2025.2457039
“…on natural genetic variation (in the form of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, human leukocyte antigen genotypes, or mitochondrial genome variation (Cardiello et al., 2023; Howitt et al., 2023; Lin et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2022)) may complement or serve as an alternative to artificial methods,…”
Li, T., Alvarez, M., Liu, C., Abuhanna, K. D., Sun, Y. F., Ernst, J., Plath, K., Balliu, B., Luo, C., & Zaitlen, N. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5977005/v1
Li, T., Alvarez, M., Liu, C., Abuhanna, K. D., Sun, Y., Ernst, J., Plath, K., Balliu, B., Luo, C., & Zaitlen, N. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106769
Probability of stealth multiplets in sample-multiplexing for droplet-based single-cell analysis
Nakaki, F., & Sharpe, J. A. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11835-z
Plate-based 10X Genomics-compatible single-cell RNA-sequencing based on Smart-seq3xpress
Deserranno, K., Callens, E., Berrevoet, D., Verplancke, A., Vos, T. D., Taghon, T., Deforce, D. L. D., & Nieuwerburgh, F. V. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-12286-2
“This can be a limiting factor in clinical settings where large cell quantities are not available [10].”
Additional file 3 of hadge: a comprehensive pipeline for donor deconvolution in single-cell studies
Curion, F., Wu, X., Heumos, L., André, M. M. G., Halle, L., Ozols, M., Grant‐Peters, M., Rich‐Griffin, C., Yeung, H.-Y., Dendrou, C. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26713097
Additional file 1 of hadge: a comprehensive pipeline for donor deconvolution in single-cell studies
Curion, F., Wu, X., Heumos, L., André, M. M. G., Halle, L., Ozols, M., Grant‐Peters, M., Rich‐Griffin, C., Yeung, H.-Y., Dendrou, C. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26713091
Additional file 4 of hadge: a comprehensive pipeline for donor deconvolution in single-cell studies
Curion, F., Wu, X., Heumos, L., André, M. M. G., Halle, L., Ozols, M., Grant‐Peters, M., Rich‐Griffin, C., Yeung, H.-Y., Dendrou, C. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26713103
Additional file 2 of hadge: a comprehensive pipeline for donor deconvolution in single-cell studies
Curion, F., Wu, X., Heumos, L., André, M. M. G., Halle, L., Ozols, M., Grant‐Peters, M., Rich‐Griffin, C., Yeung, H.-Y., Dendrou, C. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26713094
- Authors
- Cardiello, J. F., Joven Araus, A., Giatrellis, S., Helsens, C., Simon, A., & Leigh, N. D.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Corresponding author
- Leigh, Nicholas D
- ORCID
- Venue
- Life Science Alliance
- Publisher
- Life Science Alliance, LLC
- Published
- 2023-05-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e202301979
- ISSN
- 2575-1077 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10192724
- OpenAlex
- W4377011406
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Life Science Alliance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Vetenskapsrådet (2020-01486)
- EC | European Research Council
- Cancerfonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- single-cell sequencing, de novo transcriptome, zebrafish, non-human primates, reproducibility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Zebrafish, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Genomics, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review