Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generation of targeted mouse mutants by embryo microinjection of TALEN mRNA

Wefers, Benedikt, Panda, Sudeepta K, Ortiz, Oskar, Brandl, Christina, Hensler, Svenja, Hansen, Jens, Wurst, Wolfgang, Kühn, Ralf·2013·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Genetically engineered mice are instrumental for the analysis of mammalian gene function in health and disease. As classical gene targeting, which is performed in embryonic stem (ES) cell cultures and generates chimeric mice, is a time-consuming and labor-intensive procedure, we recently used transcription activator-like (TAL) effector nucleases (TALENs) for mutagenesis of the mouse genome directly in one-cell embryos. Here we describe a stepwise protocol for the generation of knock-in and knockout mice, including the selection of TALEN-binding sites, the design and construction of TALEN coding regions and of mutagenic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) and targeting vectors, mRNA production, embryo microinjection and the identification of modified alleles in founder mutants and their progeny. After a setup time of 2-3 weeks of hands-on work for TALEN construction, investigators can obtain first founder mutants for genes of choice within 7 weeks after embryo microinjections.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2013.142

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Capecchi, M.R. Gene targeting in mice: functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 507–512 (2005). · DOI
  2. Rouet, P., Smih, F. & Jasin, M. Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6064–6068 (1994). · DOI
  3. Porteus, M.H. & Carroll, D. Gene targeting using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 967–973 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Meyer, M., de Angelis, M.H., Wurst, W. & Kuhn, R. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15022–15026 (2010). · DOI
  5. Meyer, M., Ortiz, O., Hrabé de Angelis, M., Wurst, W. & Kühn, R. Modeling disease mutations by gene targeting in one-cell mouse embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9354–9359 (2012). · DOI
  6. Boch, J. et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 326, 1509–1512 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Moscou, M.J. & Bogdanove, A.J. A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science 326, 1501 (2009). · DOI
  8. Boch, J. & Bonas, U. Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48, 419–436 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bogdanove, A.J., Schornack, S. & Lahaye, T. TAL effectors: finding plant genes for disease and defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 394–401 (2010). · DOI
  10. Scholze, H. & Boch, J. TAL effectors are remote controls for gene activation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 47–53 (2011). · DOI
  11. Deng, D. et al. Structural basis for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 335, 720–723 (2012). · DOI
  12. Mak, A.N.-S., Bradley, P., Cernadas, R.A., Bogdanove, A.J. & Stoddard, B.L. The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 335, 716–719 (2012). · DOI
  13. Miller, J.C. et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 143–148 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Christian, M. et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 186, 757–761 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cermak, T. et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011). · DOI
  16. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hsu, P.D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Wefers, B. et al. Direct production of mouse disease models by embryo microinjection of TALENs and oligodeoxynucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3782–3787 (2013). · DOI
  21. Hockemeyer, D. et al. Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 731–734 (2011). · DOI
  22. Wang, H. et al. TALEN-mediated editing of the mouse Y chromosome. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 530–532 (2013). · DOI
  23. Doyle, E.L. et al. TAL effector-nucleotide targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W117–W122 (2012). · DOI
  24. Sander, J.D. et al. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 697–698 (2011). · DOI
  25. Meckler, J.F. et al. Quantitative analysis of TALE-DNA interactions suggests polarity effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4118–4128 (2013). · DOI
  26. Streubel, J., Blücher, C., Landgraf, A. & Boch, J. TAL effector RVD specificities and efficiencies. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 593–595 (2012). · DOI
  27. Cong, L., Zhou, R., Kuo, Y.-C., Cunniff, M. & Zhang, F. Comprehensive interrogation of natural TALE DNA-binding modules and transcriptional repressor domains. Nat. Commun. 3, 968 (2012). · DOI
  28. Chen, F. et al. High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Methods 8, 753–755 (2011). · DOI
  29. Wefers, B., Wurst, W. & Kühn, R. Design and Generation of gene-targeting vectors. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 1, 199–211 (2011). · DOI
  30. Hasty, P., Abuin, A. & Bradley, A. Gene targeting, principles, and practice in mammalian cells. in Gene Targeting: A Practical Approach (ed. Joyner, A.L.) 1–35 (Oxford University Press, 2000). · DOI
  31. Hasty, P., Rivera-Pérez, J. & Bradley, A. The length of homology required for gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 5586–5591 (1991). · DOI
  32. Deng, C. & Capecchi, M.R. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 3365–3371 (1992). · DOI
  33. Reyon, D. et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 460–465 (2012). · DOI
  34. Briggs, A.W. et al. Iterative capped assembly: rapid and scalable synthesis of repeat-module DNA such as TAL effectors from individual monomers. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e117 (2012). · DOI
  35. Kim, H. et al. Surrogate reporters for enrichment of cells with nuclease-induced mutations. Nat. Methods 8, 941–943 (2011). · DOI
  36. Perez-Pinera, P., Ousterout, D.G., Brown, M.T. & Gersbach, C.A. Gene targeting to the ROSA26 locus directed by engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3741–3752 (2012). · DOI
  37. Adenot, P.G., Mercier, Y., Renard, J.P. & Thompson, E.M. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Dev. Camb. Engl. 124, 4615–4625 (1997).
  38. Sung, Y.H. et al. Knockout mice created by TALEN-mediated gene targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 23–24 (2013). · DOI
  39. Tesson, L. et al. Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 695–696 (2011). · DOI
  40. Davies, B. et al. Site-specific mutation of the Zic2 locus by microinjection of TALEN mRNA in mouse CD1, C3H and C57BL/6J oocytes. PLoS ONE 8, e60216 (2013). · DOI
  41. Qiu, Z. et al. High-efficiency and heritable gene targeting in mouse by transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e120 (2013).
  42. Southern, E. Southern blotting. Nat. Protoc. 1, 518–525 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Liew, M. et al. Genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms by high-resolution melting of small amplicons. Clin. Chem. 50, 1156–1164 (2004). · DOI
  44. Ittner, L.M. & Götz, J. Pronuclear injection for the production of transgenic mice. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1206–1215 (2007). · DOI
  45. Nagy, A., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K. & Behringer, R. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, 2003).
  46. Sanjana, N.E. et al. A transcription activator-like effector toolbox for genome engineering. Nat. Protoc. 7, 171–192 (2012). · DOI
  47. Schmid-Burgk, J.L., Schmidt, T., Kaiser, V., Höning, K. & Hornung, V. A ligation-independent cloning technique for high-throughput assembly of transcription activator–like effector genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 76–81 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Wefers, B., Panda, S. K., Ortiz, O., Brandl, C., Hensler, S., Hansen, J., Wurst, W., & Kühn, R.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2013-10-31
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
2355-2379
ISSN
  • 1754-2189
  • 1750-2799
Cited by
58
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review