Cited by 436Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Implications for KRAS status and EGFR-targeted therapies in metastatic CRC

Normanno, Nicola, Tejpar, Sabine, Morgillo, Floriana, De Luca, Antonella, Van Cutsem, Eric, Ciardiello, Fortunato·2009·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

EGFR regulates cancer-cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor-induced neoangiogenesis, and has been validated as a relevant therapeutic target in several human cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab are available for the treatment of patients with mCRC. Although EGFR is expressed in approximately 85% of patients with mCRC, the clinical efficacy of treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies is limited to a subset of patients. A series of potential biomarkers that could be useful in predicting response to EGFR inhibitors has been investigated. In patients with mCRC, activating mutations within KRAS can predict resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Activating mutations in KRAS, which could result in EGFR-independent intracellular signal transduction activation, are found in approximately 35-40% of patients with mCRC. These mutations are almost exclusively detected in codons 12 and 13 of exon 2. KRAS mutations have been significantly associated with lack of response to cetuximab or panitumumab therapy in patients with mCRC, which suggests that EGFR-independent, constitutive activation of the RAS signaling pathway could impair response to anti-EGFR drugs. We summarize the experimental and clinical evidence supporting the use of KRAS testing for the optimal selection of patients with mCRC to be treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.111

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Normanno, N., Tejpar, S., Morgillo, F., De Luca, A., Van Cutsem, E., & Ciardiello, F.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Corresponding author
Ciardiello, Fortunato
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
519-527
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W2038624343
Cited by
436
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 45
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
KRAS mutation, anti-EGFR therapy, metastatic colorectal cancer, cetuximab, panitumumab, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, predictive biomarkers, Ras signaling, treatment resistance, patient selection, irinotecan
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Amino Acid Sequence, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Aspartic Acid, Base Sequence, Codon, Exons, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasm Metastasis, Genes, ras, Biomarkers, Tumor, Valine, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Point Mutation, Patient Selection, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Amino Acid Substitution, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review