Cited by 850Autophagy in Disease and TherapyUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 306 of the 307 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles

Open access
Galluzzi, Lorenzo, Bravo-San Pedro, José Manuel, Levine, Beth, Green, Douglas R., Kroemer, Guido·2017·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Autophagy is central to the maintenance of organismal homeostasis in both physiological and pathological situations. Accordingly, alterations in autophagy have been linked to clinically relevant conditions as diverse as cancer, neurodegeneration and cardiac disorders. Throughout the past decade, autophagy has attracted considerable attention as a target for the development of novel therapeutics. However, such efforts have not yet generated clinically viable interventions. In this Review, we discuss the therapeutic potential of autophagy modulators, analyse the obstacles that have limited their development and propose strategies that may unlock the full therapeutic potential of autophagy modulation in the clinic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd.2017.22

Cites

306 of 306 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

4 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 307 references

1 of the 307 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 850

Metadata

Authors
Galluzzi, L., Bravo-San Pedro, J. M., Levine, B., Green, D. R., & Kroemer, G.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2017-05-19
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
487-511
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2615994102
Cited by
842
References
307
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 30
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA109618)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI109725)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
autophagy, autophagy modulators, drug development, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular disease, infectious diseases, homeostasis, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Heart Diseases, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Design, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review