Cited by 1,475Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn

Open access
Todd, Andrew J.·2010·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Neurons in the spinal dorsal horn process sensory information, which is then transmitted to several brain regions, including those responsible for pain perception. The dorsal horn provides numerous potential targets for the development of novel analgesics and is thought to undergo changes that contribute to the exaggerated pain felt after nerve injury and inflammation. Despite its obvious importance, we still know little about the neuronal circuits that process sensory information, mainly because of the heterogeneity of the various neuronal components that make up these circuits. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the neuronal organization and circuitry of this complex region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2947

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 162 references

2 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Todd, A. J. in Handbook of Clinical Neurology 3rd Series, Pain. (Eds Cervero, F. and Jensen, T. S.) 61–76 (Elsevier, Edinburgh, 2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 998

Metadata

Authors
Todd, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Todd, Andrew J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
823-836
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2059635921
Cited by
1,475
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 39
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (076976)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
dorsal horn, spinal cord, pain processing, neural circuits, hyperalgesia, allodynia, sensory neurons, analgesic targets, nerve injury, inflammation, pain perception
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Nerve Net, Nociceptors, Pain, Posterior Horn Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review