Cited by 128Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Food‐Related Odor Probes of Brain Reward Circuits During Hunger: A Pilot fMRI Study

Open access
Bragulat, Veronique, Dzemidzic, Mario, Bruno, Carolina, Cox, Cari A., Talavage, Thomas, Considine, Robert V., Kareken, David A.·2010·Obesity

Abstract

Food aromas can be powerful appetitive cues in the natural environment. Although several studies have examined the cerebral responses to food images, none have used naturalistic food aromas to study obesity. Ten individuals (five normal‐weight and five obese) were recruited to undergo 24 h of food deprivation. Subjects were then imaged on a 3T Siemens Trio‐Tim scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) while smelling four food‐related odors (FRO; two sweet odors and two fat‐related) and four “nonappetitive odors” (NApO; e.g., Douglas fir). Before the imaging session, subjects rated their desire to eat each type of food to determine their most preferred (P‐FRO). Across all 10 subjects, P‐FRO elicited a greater blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response than the NApO in limbic and reward‐related areas, including the bilateral insula and opercular (gustatory) cortex, the anterior and posterior cingulate, and ventral striatum. Obese subjects showed greater activation in the bilateral hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, but lean controls showed more activation in the posterior insula. Brain areas activated by food odors are similar to those elicited by cues of addictive substances, such as alcohol. Food odors are highly naturalistic stimuli, and may be effective probes of reward‐related networks in the context of hunger and obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2010.57

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Responses to food cues depend on nutrition status, highlighting the role of the homeostatic network in controlling the reward network, which is also influenced by stress-processing pathways.

    “The dependence of the responses to food cues on the nutrition status (60,61) highlights the role of the homeostatic network in the control of the reward network, which in turn is also influenced by neuronal pathways that process stress.”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bragulat, V., Dzemidzic, M., Bruno, C., Cox, C. A., Talavage, T., Considine, R. V., & Kareken, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
  • Considine, Robert V.
  • Kareken, David A.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1566-1571
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2140940174
Cited by
128
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA014605)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
food aroma, hunger, brain reward circuits, food deprivation, appetite, insula, ventral striatum, cingulate cortex, hippocampus, gustatory cortex, naturalistic stimuli, food cues
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Food, Food Deprivation, Food Preferences, Humans, Hunger, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Odorants, Pilot Projects, Reward, Smell, Stimulation, Chemical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review