Cited by 13Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

EEG reveals that dextroamphetamine improves cognitive control through multiple processes in healthy participants

Open access
Bhakta, Savita G., Cavanagh, James F., Talledo, Jo A., Kotz, Juliana E., Benster, Lindsay, Roberts, Benjamin Z., Nungaray, John A., Brigman, Jonathan L. +3 more·2022·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The poor translatability between preclinical and clinical drug trials has limited pro-cognitive therapeutic development. Future pro-cognitive drug trials should use translatable cross-species cognitive tasks with biomarkers (1) relevant to specific cognitive constructs, and (2) sensitive to drug treatment. Here, we used a difficulty-modulated variant of a cross-species cognitive control task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neurophysiological biomarkers sensitive to the pro-cognitive effects of dextroamphetamine (d-amp) (10 or 20 mg) in healthy adults (n = 23), in a randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, double blind, within-subject study, conducted across three test days each separated by one week. D-amp boosted d-prime, sped reaction time, and increased frontal P3a amplitude to non-target correct rejections independent of task difficulty. Task difficulty did however, moderate d-amp effects on EEG during target performance. D-amp suppressed frontal theta power during easy target responses which negatively correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate while d-amp-induced changes in P3b amplitude during hard target trials strongly correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate. In summary, d-amp affected both behavioral and neurophysiological measures of cognitive control elements. Under low-demand, d-amp diminished cognitive control by suppressing theta, yet under high-demand it boosted control in concert with higher P3b amplitudes. These findings thus appear to reflect a gain-sharpening effect of d-amp: during high-demand processes were boosted while during low-demand processes were neglected. Future studies will use these neurophysiological measures of cognitive control as biomarkers to predict d-amp sensitivity in people with cognitive control deficits, including schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-021-01257-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dove A, Pollmann S, Schubert T, Wiggins CJ, von Cramon DY. Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. Brain Res. Cogn Brain Res. 2000;9:103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(99)0009-4. · DOI
  2. Ridderinkhof KR, van den Wildenberg WP, Segalowitz SJ, Carter CS. Neurocog- nitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn. 2004;56:129-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbandc2004.09.016. · DOI
  3. Mass R, Wolf K, Wagner M, Haasen C. Differential sustained attention/vigilance changes over time in schizophrenics and controls during a degraded stimulus continuous performance test. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;250:24-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/pI0000753. · DOI
  4. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition. (SCID-I/NP): Biometrics Research. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhakta, S. G., Cavanagh, J. F., Talledo, J. A., Kotz, J. E., Benster, L., Roberts, B. Z., Nungaray, J. A., Brigman, J. L., Light, G. A., Swerdlow, N. R., & Young, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Jared W.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
1029-1036
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W4206234073
Cited by
13
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (UH3 MH109168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
d-amphetamine, cognitive control, neurophysiological markers, P3a, P3b, frontal theta power, task difficulty, d-prime, reaction time, schizophrenia, translational drug development
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Electroencephalography, Humans, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review