Cited by 296Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation

Mattay, Venkata S., Callicott, Joseph H., Bertolino, Alessandro, Heaton, Ian, Frank, Joseph A., Coppola, Richard, Berman, Karen F., Goldberg, Terry E. +1 more·2000·NeuroImage

Abstract

Monoaminergic neurotransmitters are known to have modulatory effects on cognition and on neurophysiological function in the cortex. The current study was performed with BOLD fMRI to examine physiological correlates of the effects of dextroamphetamine on working-memory performance in healthy controls. In a group analysis dextroamphetamine increased BOLD signal in the right prefrontal cortex during a task with increasing working-memory load that approached working-memory capacity. However, the effect of dextroamphetamine on performance and on signal change varied across individuals. Dextroamphetamine improved performance only in those subjects who had relatively low working-memory capacity at baseline, whereas in the subjects who had high working-memory capacity at baseline, it worsened performance. In subjects whose performance deteriorated, signal change was greater than that in subjects who had an improvement in performance, and these variations were correlated (Spearman rho = 0.89, P<0.02). These data shed light on the manner in which monoaminergic tone, working memory, and prefrontal function interact and, moreover, demonstrate that even in normal subjects the behavioral and neurophysiologic effects of dextroamphetamine are not homogeneous. These heterogeneic effects of dextroamphetamine may be explained by genetic variations that interact with the effects of dextroamphetamine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2000.0610

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattay, V. S., Callicott, J. H., Bertolino, A., Heaton, I., Frank, J. A., Coppola, R., Berman, K. F., Goldberg, T. E., & Weinberger, D. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Mattay, Venkata S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
268-275
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120548621
Cited by
296
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
d-amphetamine, working memory, prefrontal cortex, monoamines, individual differences, working memory capacity, BOLD signal, cortical activation, genetic variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review