Cited by 222Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers

Barch, Deanna M., Carter, Cameron S.·2005·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Recent research on schizophrenia indicates that cognitive deficits in this illness are important predictors of functional outcome, highlighting the need for treatments that have a positive impact on cognitive function. Here we explore the hypothesis that acute administration of d-amphetamine can improve cognitive function in individuals with schizophrenia who are well-treated with typical antipsychotics, as well as in healthy controls performing under dual task conditions designed to elicit performance deficits analogous to those found in schizophrenia. Methods Ten individuals with schizophrenia taking haldol or prolixin and 22 healthy controls performed spatial working memory, language production, and Stroop tasks under both placebo and 0.25 mg/kg of D-amphetamine. Results D-Amphetamine improved reactions times on the spatial working memory and Stroop tasks for both individuals with schizophrenia and controls, and improved working memory accuracy in schizophrenia. In addition, D-amphetamine improved language production for both individuals with schizophrenia and controls. Conclusions These results provide support for the hypothesis that the adjunctive administration of dopamine agonist can improve cognitive in individuals with schizophrenia taking typical antipsychotics. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the nature of working memory deficits in schizophrenia, and potential future avenues for cognitive enhancement in this il…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.019

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barch, D. M., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Barch, Deanna M.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
43-58
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159404136
Cited by
222
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
amphetamine, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Space Perception, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review