Cited by 28Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDietary Effects on HealthAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Effects of meal timing on changes in circulating epinephrine, norepinephrine, and acylated ghrelin concentrations: A pilot study

Open access
Bo, Simona, Broglio, Fabio, Settanni, Fabio, Parasiliti Caprino, Mirko, Ianniello, Alice, Mengozzi, Giulio, De Francesco, Antonella, Fadda, Maurizio +4 more·2017·Nutrition & Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timing of food intake impacts on metabolic diseases. Few data are available about post-meal changes in epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), and acylated ghrelin (AG) at different times of the day. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This randomized cross-over trial investigated E/NE/AG concentrations after identical meals consumed at 0800 or 2000 hours in 20 healthy volunteers, by standardizing diet, exercise, duration of fast, and resting. Participants randomly received the test meal at 0800 or 2000 hours, and vice versa after 1 week. Blood samples were collected before and up to 180-min post-meal, every 30 min, with participants supine, motionless, but awake. RESULTS: Median E levels increased at 30-60 min, then declined and rose again at 150 min; values at 60 min (19.0 vs. 15.0 ng/l, p = 0.03) and 180 min (25.0 vs. 11.0 ng/l, p < 0.001) were higher after the morning meals. NE rose at 30-60 min and then progressively declined; median values at 60 min (235.3 vs. 206.3 ng/l, p = 0.02) and 120 min (208.8 vs. 142.0 ng/l, p = 0.04) increased more after morning meals. AG progressively declined to increase again at 90 min after meal; median AG area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were lower at morning (7206.8 vs. 8828.3 pg/mL×h). AG-AUC was inversely associated with diet-induced thermogenesis (β = -121.6; 95% CI -201.0 to 42.2; p = 0.009 for each unit increase), while log NE-AUC was inversely associated with log-triglyceride AUC (β = -0.57; 95% CI -0.98 to 0.16; p = 0.015) in a multiple regression model, after multiple adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, E/NE concentrations were higher after the morning meal, while AG showed an opposite behavior. These data, although requiring confirmation in larger samples, suggest an adjunctive possible mechanism explaining the unfavorable effects of evening eating on metabolic risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41387-017-0010-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy volunteers, unfavorable effects of evening eating on metabolic risk were due to lower concentrations of epinephrine/norepinephrine and higher concentrations of acylated ghrelin after the evening dinner (at 20:00), with the opposite behavior after the morning meal (at 8:00).

    “One study showed that the unfavorable effects of evening eating on metabolic risk in healthy volunteers were due to lower concentrations of epinephrine/norepinephrine and higher concentrations of acylated ghrelin after the evening dinner (at 20:00), with the opposite behavior exhibited after the morning meal (at 8:00) [271].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bo, S., Broglio, F., Settanni, F., Parasiliti Caprino, M., Ianniello, A., Mengozzi, G., De Francesco, A., Fadda, M., Fedele, D., Guggino, A., Ghigo, E., & Maccario, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Bo, Simona
Venue
Nutrition & Diabetes
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
303-303
ISSN
2044-4052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774612537
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition and Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
meal timing, epinephrine, norepinephrine, acylated ghrelin, circadian rhythm, postprandial hormone response, diet-induced thermogenesis, triglycerides, sympathetic nervous system, healthy volunteers, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk, inflammation, insulin sensitivity, appetite regulation, gut microbiota, gut-brain axis
MeSH terms
Acylation, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diet, Eating, Epinephrine, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Norepinephrine, Pilot Projects, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Ghrelin, Young Adult, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review