Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

p53 partial loss-of-function mutations sensitize to chemotherapy

Klimovich, Boris, Merle, Nastasja, Neumann, Michelle, Elmshäuser, Sabrina, Nist, Andrea, Mernberger, Marco, Kazdal, Daniel, Stenzinger, Albrecht, Timofeev, Oleg, Stiewe, Thorsten·2022·Oncogene

Abstract

The tumor suppressive transcription factor p53 is frequently inactivated in cancer cells by missense mutations that cluster in the DNA binding domain. 30% hit mutational hotspot residues, resulting in a complete loss of transcriptional activity and mutant p53-driven chemotherapy resistance. Of the remaining 70% of non-hotspot mutants, many are partial loss-of-function (partial-LOF) mutants with residual transcriptional activity. The therapeutic consequences of a partial-LOF have remained largely elusive. Using a p53 mutation engineered to reduce DNA binding, we demonstrate that partial-LOF is sufficient to enhance oncogene-driven tumorigenesis in mouse models of lung and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Interestingly, mouse and human tumors with partial-LOF mutations showed mutant p53 protein accumulation similar as known for hotspot mutants. Different from the chemotherapy resistance caused by p53-loss, the partial-LOF mutant sensitized to an apoptotic chemotherapy response and led to a survival benefit. Mechanistically, the pro-apoptotic transcriptional activity of mouse and human partial-LOF mutants was rescued at high mutant protein levels, suggesting that accumulation of partial-LOF mutants enables the observed apoptotic chemotherapy response. p53 non-hotspot mutants with partial-LOF, therefore, represent tumorigenic p53 mutations that need to be distinguished from other mutations because of their beneficial impact on survival in a therapy context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41388-021-02141-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Donehower LA, Soussi T, Korkut A, Liu Y, Schultz A, Cardenas M, et al. Integrated analysis of TP53 gene and pathway alterations in the Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1370–84. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mello SS, Attardi LD. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;51:65–72. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Leroy B, Anderson M, Soussi T. TP53 mutations in human cancer: database reassessment and prospects for the next decade. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:672–88. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Joerger AC, Fersht AR. Structural biology of the tumor suppressor p53. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:557–82. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Stiewe T, Haran TE. How mutations shape p53 interactions with the genome to promote tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2018;38:27–43. · DOI
  6. Kim MP, Lozano G. Mutant p53 partners in crime. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:161–8. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Freed-Pastor WA, Prives C. Mutant p53: one name, many proteins. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1268–86. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Robles AI, Jen J, Harris CC Clinical Outcomes of TP53 Mutations in Cancers. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016; 6:a026294. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kato S, Han SY, Liu W, Otsuka K, Shibata H, Kanamaru R, et al. Understanding the function-structure and function-mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8424–9. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Resnick MA, Inga A. Functional mutants of the sequence-specific transcription factor p53 and implications for master genes of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9934–9. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kotler E, Shani O, Goldfeld G, Lotan-Pompan M, Tarcic O, Gershoni A, et al. A Systematic p53 mutation library links differential functional impact to cancer mutation pattern and evolutionary conservation. Mol Cell. 2018;71:178–90. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wang Y, Suh YA, Fuller MY, Jackson JG, Xiong S, Terzian T, et al. Restoring expression of wild-type p53 suppresses tumor growth but does not cause tumor regression in mice with a p53 missense mutation. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:893–904. · DOI
  13. Post SM, Quintas-Cardama A, Terzian T, Smith C, Eischen CM, Lozano G. p53-dependent senescence delays Emu-myc-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis. Oncogene. 2010;29:1260–9. · DOI
  14. Schmitt CA, Fridman JS, Yang M, Baranov E, Hoffman RM, Lowe SW. Dissecting p53 tumor suppressor functions in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:289–98. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Morton JP, Timpson P, Karim SA, Ridgway RA, Athineos D, Doyle B, et al. Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:246–51. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Timofeev O, Stiewe T Rely on Each Other: DNA Binding Cooperativity Shapes p53 Functions in Tumor Suppression and Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2422. · DOI
  17. Blanden AR, Yu X, Blayney AJ, Demas C, Ha JH, Liu Y et al. Zinc shapes the folding landscape of p53 and establishes a pathway for reactivating structurally diverse cancer mutants. Elife 2020; 9:e61487. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Klein C, Planker E, Diercks T, Kessler H, Kunkele KP, Lang K, et al. NMR spectroscopy reveals the solution dimerization interface of p53 core domains bound to their consensus DNA. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:49020–7. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dehner A, Klein C, Hansen S, Muller L, Buchner J, Schwaiger M, et al. Cooperative binding of p53 to DNA: regulation by protein-protein interactions through a double salt bridge. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005;44:5247–51. · DOI
  20. Weinberg RL, Veprintsev DB, Fersht AR. Cooperative binding of tetrameric p53 to DNA. J Mol Biol. 2004;341:1145–59. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, et al. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:423–9. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Kessler N, Rabinovich D, Shaulov L, Haran TE, et al. Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. Mol Cell. 2006;22:741–53. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Klimovich B, Stiewe T, Timofeev O. Inactivation of Mdm2 restores apoptosis proficiency of cooperativity mutant p53 in vivo. Cell Cycle. 2020;19:109–23. · DOI
  24. Timofeev O, Schlereth K, Wanzel M, Braun A, Nieswandt B, Pagenstecher A, et al. p53 DNA binding cooperativity is essential for apoptosis and tumor suppression in vivo. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1512–25. · DOI
  25. Mellert H, Espinosa JM. Tumor suppression by p53: Is apoptosis important or not? Cell Rep. 2013;3:1335–6. · DOI
  26. Timofeev O, Klimovich B, Schneikert J, Wanzel M, Pavlakis E, Noll J, et al. Residual apoptotic activity of a tumorigenic p53 mutant improves cancer therapy responses. EMBO J. 2019;38:e102096. · DOI
  27. Engeland K. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:114–32. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Tiwari B, Jones AE, Caillet CJ, Das S, Royer SK, Abrams JM. p53 directly represses human LINE1 transposons. Genes Dev. 2020;34:1439–51. · DOI
  29. Johnson L, Mercer K, Greenbaum D, Bronson RT, Crowley D, Tuveson DA, et al. Somatic activation of the K-ras oncogene causes early onset lung cancer in mice. Nature. 2001;410:1111–6. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Donehower LA, Harvey M, Slagle BL, McArthur MJ, Montgomery CA Jr, Butel JS, et al. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature. 1992;356:215–21. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zuber J, Radtke I, Pardee TS, Zhao Z, Rappaport AR, Luo W, et al. Mouse models of human AML accurately predict chemotherapy response. Genes Dev. 2009;23:877–89. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Abbas HA, Maccio DR, Coskun S, Jackson JG, Hazen AL, Sills TM, et al. Mdm2 is required for survival of hematopoietic stem cells/progenitors via dampening of ROS-induced p53 activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:606–17. · DOI
  33. Ringshausen I, O’Shea CC, Finch AJ, Swigart LB, Evan GI. Mdm2 is critically and continuously required to suppress lethal p53 activity in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:501–14. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Terzian T, Wang Y, Van Pelt CS, Box NF, Travis EL, Lozano G. Haploinsufficiency of Mdm2 and Mdm4 in tumorigenesis and development. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:5479–85. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lin AW, Lowe SW. Oncogenic ras activates the ARF-p53 pathway to suppress epithelial cell transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5025–30. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Rowan S, Ludwig RL, Haupt Y, Bates S, Lu X, Oren M, et al. Specific loss of apoptotic but not cell-cycle arrest function in a human tumor derived p53 mutant. EMBO J. 1996;15:827–38. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ludwig RL, Bates S, Vousden KH. Differential activation of target cellular promoters by p53 mutants with impaired apoptotic function. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4952–60. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ryan KM, Vousden KH. Characterization of structural p53 mutants which show selective defects in apoptosis but not cell cycle arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3692–8. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G. p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science. 2012;336:1440–4. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Chen X, Ko LJ, Jayaraman L, Prives C. p53 levels, functional domains, and DNA damage determine the extent of the apoptotic response of tumor cells. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2438–51. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Paek AL, Liu JC, Loewer A, Forrester WC, Lahav G. Cell-to-Cell Variation in p53 dynamics leads to fractional killing. Cell. 2016;165:631–42. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Jackson JG, Pant V, Li Q, Chang LL, Quintas-Cardama A, Garza D, et al. p53-mediated senescence impairs the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:793–806. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Andreeff M, Kelly KR, Yee K, Assouline S, Strair R, Popplewell L, et al. Results of the phase I Trial of RG7112, a small-molecule MDM2 antagonist in leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:868–76. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Timofeev O, Koch L, Niederau C, Tscherne A, Schneikert J, Klimovich M, et al. Phosphorylation control of p53 DNA-binding cooperativity balances tumorigenesis and aging. Cancer Res. 2020;80:5231–44. · DOI
  45. Mihara M, Erster S, Zaika A, Petrenko O, Chittenden T, Pancoska P, et al. p53 Has a direct apoptogenic role at the mitochondria. Mol Cell. 2003;11:577–90. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Chipuk JE, Bouchier-Hayes L, Kuwana T, Newmeyer DD, Green DR. PUMA couples the nuclear and cytoplasmic proapoptotic function of p53. Science. 2005;309:1732–5. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Klimovich, B., Merle, N., Neumann, M., Elmshäuser, S., Nist, A., Mernberger, M., Kazdal, D., Stenzinger, A., Timofeev, O., & Stiewe, T.
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2021-12-14
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1011-1023
ISSN
  • 0950-9232
  • 1476-5594
Cited by
53
References
10
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe (111250, 70112623, 111444)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR81/3 109546710, STI 182/13-1, GRK2573, TI 1028/2-1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (DZL, 031L0063)
  • Von-Behring-Röntgen-Stiftung (65-0004, 66-LV06)
  • Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (LOEWE iCANx)
  • José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung (09 R72018)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p53 partial loss-of-function mutations sensitize to chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41388-021-02141-5
The paper
Klimovich, B., Merle, N., Neumann, M., Elmshäuser, S., Nist, A., Mernberger, M., Kazdal, D., Stenzinger, A., Timofeev, O., & Stiewe, T. (2022). p53 partial loss-of-function mutations sensitize to chemotherapy. Oncogene. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-02141-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.