Cited by 33Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Meta-analysis of Technology-Enabled Mindfulness-Based Programs for Negative Affect and Mindful Awareness

Victorson, David E., Sauer, Christina M., Wolters, Lauren, Maletich, Carly, Lukoff, Kai, Sufrin, Nat·2020·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01373-y

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victorson, D. E., Sauer, C. M., Wolters, L., Maletich, C., Lukoff, K., & Sufrin, N.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Victorson, David E.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1884-1899
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3019054173
Cited by
33
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, negative affect, mindful awareness, stress, anxiety, depression, online intervention, mobile application, moderators of effect size, intervention duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review