Cited by 45Gut microbiota and healthRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutritional Studies and Diet

Intermittent cafeteria diet identifies fecal microbiome changes as a predictor of spatial recognition memory impairment in female rats

Open access
Leigh, Sarah-Jane, Kaakoush, Nadeem O., Bertoldo, Michael J., Westbrook, R. Frederick, Morris, Margaret J.·2020·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Excessive consumption of diets high in saturated fat and sugar impairs short-term spatial recognition memory in both humans and rodents. Several studies have identified associations between the observed behavioral phenotype and diet-induced changes in adiposity, hippocampal gene expression of inflammatory and blood-brain barrier-related markers, and gut microbiome composition. However, the causal role of such variables in producing cognitive impairments remains unclear. As intermittent cafeteria diet access produces an intermediate phenotype, we contrasted continuous and intermittent diet access to identify specific changes in hippocampal gene expression and microbial species that underlie the cognitive impairment observed in rats fed continuous cafeteria diet. Female adult rats were fed either regular chow, continuous cafeteria diet, or intermittent cafeteria diet cycles (4 days regular chow and 3 days cafeteria) for 7 weeks (12 rats per group). Any cafeteria diet exposure affected metabolic health, hippocampal gene expression, and gut microbiota, but only continuous access impaired short-term spatial recognition memory. Multiple regression identified an operational taxonomic unit, from species Muribaculum intestinale, as a significant predictor of performance in the novel place recognition task. Thus, contrasting intermittent and continuous cafeteria diet exposure allowed us to identify specific changes in microbial species abundance and growth as potential underlying mechanisms relevant to diet-induced cognitive impairment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-020-0734-9

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in Coprobacter elicited by varying lengths of exposure to the cafeteria diet was identified as a predictor of performances in spatial recognition memory.

    “For example, differences in Coprobacter elicited by varying lengths of exposure to the cafeteria diet was identified as a predictor of performances in spatial recognition memory (322).”
  • In rats, a cafeteria diet decreased α-diversity and impaired spatial recognition in a novel place recognition task, whereas a cycle cafeteria diet did not.

    “↓ Spatial recognition (novel | place recognition task) in Caf | but not cycle diet”
  • In rats, performance in a novel place recognition task was a significant predictor of global microbiome composition.

    “Performance in novel place | recognition task was | significant predictor of global | microbiome composition”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leigh, S.-J., Kaakoush, N. O., Bertoldo, M. J., Westbrook, R. F., & Morris, M. J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Morris, Margaret J.
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2020-01-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
36-36
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3002859174
Cited by
45
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (1126929)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
high-fat high-sugar diet, spatial recognition memory, short-term memory impairment, gut microbiota, Muribaculum intestinale, hippocampal gene expression, female rats, metabolic health
MeSH terms
Animals, Diet, Female, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Bacteroidetes, Rats, Diet, High-Fat, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review