Cited by 38Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Development and validation of BIA prediction equations of upper and lower limb lean soft tissue in athletes

Sardinha, Luís B., Correia, Inês R., Magalhães, João P., Júdice, Pedro B., Silva, Analiza M., Hetherington-Rauth, Megan·2020·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objective Knowing the distribution of lean soft tissue (LST) among the body segments is of relevance for optimizing athletic performance, monitoring response to training, and for evaluating injury risk. Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) is a portable, low cost, and easy technique to assess body composition. However, most equations used by BIA to predict LST are not specific for the athlete population. The aim of this investigation was to develop and validate equations to estimate dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) appendicular LST of the arms and legs based on whole-body BIA in athletes.Methods Arms and legs LST were assessed by DXA and whole-body reactance (Xc) and resistance (R) were measured by BIA in athletes from various sports. Using measures of height, the resistance index (RI) (RI = height 2/R) was calculated. Prediction equations were established using a cross-validation method where 177 athletes (2/3 of sample) were used for equation development and the remaining 88 athletes (1/3 of sample) were used for equation validation.Results The developed prediction equations were as follows: arm LST = 0.940 × sex (0 = male; 1 = female) + 0.042 × total body weight (kg) + 0.080 × RI + 0.024 × Xc - 3.927; leg LST = 1.983 × sex (0 = male; 1 = female) + 0.154 × total body weight (kg) + 0.127 × RI - 1.147. Both equations validated well for the arms (mean difference = 0.11 kg, R 2 = 0.89, pure error (PE) = 0.61) and for the legs (mean difference = 0.05 kg, R 2 = 0.81, PE = 1.93 kg). There were no differences (p > 0.05) in the mean observed and predicted LST for the arms and legs.Conclusion The developed BIA-based prediction equations provide a valid estimation of upper and lower body LST in athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-020-0666-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sardinha, L. B., Correia, I. R., Magalhães, J. P., Júdice, P. B., Silva, A. M., & Hetherington-Rauth, M.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Sardinha, Luís B.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
1646-1652
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W3029904966
Cited by
38
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
bioimpedance, lean tissue, appendicular lean mass, prediction equations, athletes, body composition, resistance index, upper limb, lower extremity
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Female, Humans, Leg, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review