Cited by 49Probiotics and Fermented FoodsImmune Cell Function and InteractionAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Effects of probiotic supplementation on natural killer cell function in healthy elderly individuals: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Gui, Qifeng, Wang, Ange, Zhao, Xinxiu, Huang, Shunmei, Tan, Zhongju, Xiao, Chi, Yang, Yunmei·2020·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

To evaluate evidence for the role of probiotic supplementation in enhancing natural killer (NK) cell function in healthy elderly individuals. Five electronic databases were searched, and references of included articles and eligible reviews up to December 2019, with English language and human subject restrictions, were examined. Two independent reviewers identified randomized control trials (RCTs) of probiotic supplementation influencing NK cell function in healthy elderly individuals, assessed the quality of every article, and extracted data for subsequent meta-analysis. We identified six eligible trials including 364 healthy elderly subjects. Trials were heterogeneous in study design and probiotic supplementation (including genus, strain, dose, and duration). Five trials used Lactobacillus interventions alone or in combination with Bifidobacterium. Only one trial focused on Bacillus coagulans. The duration of supplementation ranged from 3 to 12 weeks, and the doses, from 1 × 10 9 to 4 × 10 10 colony-forming units. Pooling data of eligible trials showed that probiotics significantly (P < 0.05) increased NK cell activity in healthy elderly individuals (standardized mean difference = 0.777, 95% confidence interval: 0.187‒1.366, P = 0.01, I 2 = 84.6%). Although we obtained a significant outcome, the data do not provide convincing evidence for associations between probiotic supplementation and enhancement of NK cell function, given the small final number and very large heterogeneity. More RCTs with sufficient sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to focus on optimal probiotic dose, species, and duration of supplementation for healthy elderly individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-020-0670-z

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of six randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials concluded that probiotics significantly increased natural killer cell activity in healthy elderly individuals.

    “A recent review of six randomized, placebo controlled clinical trials (RCT), with various strains and dosages, concluded that probiotics significantly increased NK cell activity in healthy elderly individuals (Gui et al., 2020).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Gui et al., 2020

  • The conclusion that probiotics increase natural killer cell activity in healthy elderly individuals is not definitive because of heterogeneity among studies and small numbers of participants.

    “The authors did however caution that this conclusion is not definitive given the heterogeneity among studies and small numbers of participants involved.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Gui et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gui, Q., Wang, A., Zhao, X., Huang, S., Tan, Z., Xiao, C., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Chi
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
1630-1637
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W3034053363
Cited by
49
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC2000501, 2018YFC2000301)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
probiotics, natural killer cells, NK cell function, older adults, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacillus coagulans, immunosenescence, dietary supplementation, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Aged, Health Status, Humans, Killer Cells, Natural, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review