Cited by 142DNA and Biological ComputingNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

DNA assembly for nanopore data storage readout

Open access
Lopez, Randolph, Chen, Yuan-Jyue, Dumas Ang, Siena, Yekhanin, Sergey, Makarychev, Konstantin, Racz, Miklos Z, Seelig, Georg, Strauss, Karin +1 more·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Synthetic DNA is becoming an attractive substrate for digital data storage due to its density, durability, and relevance in biological research. A major challenge in making DNA data storage a reality is that reading DNA back into data using sequencing by synthesis remains a laborious, slow and expensive process. Here, we demonstrate successful decoding of 1.67 megabytes of information stored in short fragments of synthetic DNA using a portable nanopore sequencing platform. We design and validate an assembly strategy for DNA storage that drastically increases the throughput of nanopore sequencing. Importantly, this assembly strategy is generalizable to any application that requires nanopore sequencing of small DNA amplicons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-10978-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The error rate of second-generation synthesis and sequencing technology is less than 5%, while that of third-generation is about 10-15%.

    “The error rate of the second-generation synthesis and sequencing technology is less than 5%, while that of the third-generation is about 10–15% [31, 32].”
  • A DNA assembly strategy was established to overcome the problem in reading short DNA strands by Nanopore sequencer.

    “Lopez et al. (2019) established a DNA assembly strategy to overcome the problem in reading short DNA strands by Nanopore sequencer.”
  • Nanopore sequencing commercialized by Oxford Nanopore Technologies has been used because of its ease of implementation, automation, and portability.

    “sequencing using protein nanopores, commercialized by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, has been used because of its ease of implementation, automation, and portability”
  • Sufficient pore utilization for high sequencing throughput can only be realized for long fragments (>1 kb).

    “sufficient pore utilization for high sequencing throughput can only be realized for long fragments (>1 kb).”
  • The process of combining oligo libraries via Gibson assembly or overlap extension PCR reintroduces difficult-to-automatize steps into the sequencing workflow, calling into question nanopore sequencing's claims of improved portability and ease of automation over SBS.

    “This process, usually performed via Gibson assembly or overlap extension PCR,70,81,86 reintroduces several difficult-to-automatize steps into the sequencing workflow, which calls the approach’s claims of improved portability and ease of automation over SBS into question.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Gopalan, Parikshit S., et al. Trace reconstruction from noisy polynucleotide sequencer reads. U.S. Patent Application No. 15/536, 115 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez, R., Chen, Y.-J., Dumas Ang, S., Yekhanin, S., Makarychev, K., Racz, M. Z., Seelig, G., Strauss, K., & Ceze, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-07-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2933-2933
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955617048
Cited by
142
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Molecular Informatics)
  • Microsoft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
DNA data storage, nanopore sequencing, synthetic DNA, data readout, sequencing throughput
MeSH terms
DNA, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Databases, Genetic, Nanotechnology, Nanopores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review