Cited by 240CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Partial DNA-guided Cas9 enables genome editing with reduced off-target activity

Open access
Yin, Hao, Song, Chun-Qing, Suresh, Sneha, Kwan, Suet-Yan, Wu, Qiongqiong, Walsh, Stephen, Ding, Junmei, Bogorad, Roman L +6 more·2018·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 is a versatile RNA-guided genome editing tool. Here we demonstrate that partial replacement of RNA nucleotides with DNA nucleotides in CRISPR RNA (crRNA) enables efficient gene editing in human cells. This strategy of partial DNA replacement retains on-target activity when used with both crRNA and sgRNA, as well as with multiple guide sequences. Partial DNA replacement also works for crRNA of Cpf1, another CRISPR system. We find that partial DNA replacement in the guide sequence significantly reduces off-target genome editing through focused analysis of off-target cleavage, measurement of mismatch tolerance and genome-wide profiling of off-target sites. Using the structure of the Cas9-sgRNA complex as a guide, the majority of the 3' end of crRNA can be replaced with DNA nucleotide, and the 5 - and 3'-DNA-replaced crRNA enables efficient genome editing. Cas9 guided by a DNA-RNA chimera may provide a generalized strategy to reduce both the cost and the off-target genome editing in human cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.2559

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemical modifications on sgRNAs can influence their off-target effect.

    “Apart from sgRNA length adjustment, chemical modifications on sgRNAs can also influence their off-target effect.”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Yin et al., 2018

  • Replacement of ribonucleotides by deoxyribonucleotides reduces off-target effects.

    “The replacement of ribonucleotides by deoxyribonucleotides also reduced off-target effects”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Yin et al., 2018

  • AAV delivery in vivo lasts for years in terminally differentiated cell types.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in vivo [95–105] | AAV: Last for years in terminally differentiated cell types | May cause accumulation of off-target mutations |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Results section on therapeutic delivery reports Cas9 ribonucleoprotein electroporation in Jurkat T cells, not AAV delivery in vivo. The Cell culture and FACS methods describe lentiviral infection, but no passage found for AAV lasting years in terminally differentiated cells (searched: AAV, long-term expression, and terminally differentiated cells). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LNP delivery in vivo eliminates off-target effects.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in vivo [95–105] | LNP: Can be quickly degraded in vivo | Eliminate off-target effects |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Discussion describes reduced off-target activity from partially DNA-replaced guides in mammalian cells and mentions improved delivery technologies only as a possible future combination. Neither the supplied passages nor searches for LNP, in vivo delivery, and elimination of off-target effects found a test of LNP delivery or evidence that it eliminates off-target effects. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AAV delivery in vivo may cause accumulation of off-target mutations.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in vivo [95–105] | AAV: Last for years in terminally differentiated cell types | May cause accumulation of off-target mutations |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Results section on off-target editing reports indels in cultured cells, not accumulation of mutations after in vivo AAV delivery. Searches for AAV, prolonged expression, and in vivo off-target accumulation found no passage addressing that risk; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Suresh, S., Kwan, S.-Y., Wu, Q., Walsh, S., Ding, J., Bogorad, R. L., Zhu, L. J., Wolfe, S. A., Koteliansky, V., Xue, W., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xue, Wen
  • Anderson, Daniel G
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2018-01-29
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
311-316
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2785793003
Cited by
240
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL131471, DP2HL137167)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA151884, R00CA169512, P30CA014051)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target effects, genome editing specificity, CRISPR/Cas12a, mismatch tolerance, guide RNA design, human cells
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Alleles, Cell Separation, DNA, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Nucleotides, Oligonucleotides, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Jurkat Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Green Fluorescent Proteins, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review