Cited by 853Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The Human Gut Microbiome: From Association to Modulation

Open access
Schmidt, Thomas S.B., Raes, Jeroen, Bork, Peer·2018·Cell

Abstract

Our understanding of the human gut microbiome continues to evolve at a rapid pace, but practical application of thisknowledge is still in its infancy. This review discusses the type of studies that will be essential for translating microbiome research into targeted modulations with dedicated benefits for the human host.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.044

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microbiome co-regulates many physiological functions involving the immune, neuroendocrine and metabolic systems via complex reciprocal feedback mechanisms that operate between the microbial ecosystem and the host.

    “The microbiome is known to co-regulate many physiological functions involving the immune, neuroendocrine and metabolic systems via complex reciprocal feedback mechanisms that operate between the microbial ecosystem and the host [116,117].”

    From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [117]

    The “Intrinsic host factors such as genetics” section describes reciprocal links between the microbiome and the immune system, and increasing evidence for a reciprocal brain–gut–microbiota axis. Box 3 discusses microbial effects on drug metabolism and dietary responses. These passages support host–microbiome interactions, but do not establish the claim’s broader account of co-regulation across immune, neuroendocrine, and metabolic systems through reciprocal feedback mechanisms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing pharmacological treatments for PD could be improved through an appreciation of the gut microbiome.

    “Existing pharmacological treatments for PD could be improved through an appreciation of the gut microbiome [151, 152].”

    From The gut–brain axis in early Parkinson’s disease: from prodrome to prevention (2025) · cites this paper as [152]

    Box 3 (page unavailable) reports that gut-microbiome features can affect responses to some drugs, supporting the general possibility of improving treatment through microbiome knowledge. It does not address pharmacological treatments for Parkinson’s disease specifically; its mention of anti-PD1 concerns cancer immunotherapy, not PD treatment. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microbiome-targeted interventions may impact psychological health in a manner strongly shaped by individual lifestyle patterns.

    “Consequently, it has been proposed that microbiome-targeted interventions may impact psychological health in a manner that is strongly shaped by individual lifestyle patterns (Schmidt et al., 2018; Morales-Torres et al., 2023).”

    From Psychobiotics in mental health: insights from human clinical trials via the gut-brain axis (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt et al., 2018

    The “Prebiotics and dietary intervention” section (page not provided) describes microbiome-mediated therapy options and says responses to dietary intervention may be individual. Box 3 (page not provided) reports that models incorporating lifestyle factors predicted dietary responses. The paper does not establish psychological-health effects or say that such effects are strongly shaped by individual lifestyle patterns. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inter-individual differences in enterotype composition are increasingly thought to explain the variation in response to a dietary intervention or perturbation.

    “Inter-individual differences in enterotype composition are increasingly thought to explain the variation in response to a dietary intervention or perturbation [86].”
  • The microbiota composition is deeply influenced by environmental factors, including diet, lifestyle, and medication use.

    “The microbiota composition is in fact deeply influenced by environmental factors, including diet, lifestyle, and medication use [43,44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, T. S. B., Raes, J., & Bork, P.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE)
Corresponding author
Raes, Jeroen
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
172
Issue
6
Pages
1198-1215
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790856964
Cited by
845
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 30
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EMBL
  • European Research Council MicrobioS (ERC-AdG-669830)
  • Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) CORE microCancer
  • KU Leuven/Rega
  • VIB
  • FWO EOS programme (G0G4118N)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
human gut microbiome, microbiota composition, microbiota modulation, longitudinal cohort, perturbation experiments, absolute quantification, taxonomic resolution, in vitro and in vivo models
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Host Microbial Interactions, Disease, Health Status, Humans, Research, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review