Cited by 733Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsRisk Perception and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation

Druckman, James N., McGrath, Mary C.·2019·Nature Climate Change

DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The American Voter. By A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960. Pp. viii, 573. $8.50.)
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Peters, E. M., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., & Mandel, G. N. (2012) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 2,421
The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x · Cited by 2,205
The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know?
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-1262 · Cited by 1,821
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569
Self-citation
The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137 · Cited by 1,302

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Kahan, D. In Culture, Politics and Climate Change (eds Boykoff, M. & Crow, D.) 203–220 (Routledge, London, 2014).
Gubitz, S., Klar, S., Robison, J. & Druckman, J. N. In New Directions in Media and Politics 2nd edn (ed. Ridout, T. N.) Ch. 3 (Routledge, New York, 2018).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine. Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2017).
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. E. The American Voter (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960).
Sears, D. O. & Whitney, R. E. Political Persuasion (General Learning, Morristown, 1973).

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 731

Introduction
Benson, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197767283.003.0001
The Limits of Elections and Markets
Benson, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197767283.003.0003
Conclusion
Benson, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197767283.003.0010
Democracy’s Epistemic Problems
Benson, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197767283.003.0002
Can Information, Compensation, and Party Cues Increase Mass Support for Green Taxes?Preprint
Bürgisser, R., Stadelmann‐Steffen, I., & Armingeon, K. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/8e9bn
Sustainable Design: Postcards for Learning Delivered
Young, A. (2024) · doi:10.31274/td-20240617-39
Racionalnost i (svjetonazorska) polarizacija uvjerenja
Maglić, M., & Vranić, A. (2024) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.33.2.8
“…e ljudi gaje mogla bi biti posljedic a upravo takve izloženosti različitim informacijama – u b ejzijanskim terminima, ljudi imaju različite „priore ”, tj. a priori uvjerenja , i racionalno tumače nove informacije u svjetlu tih različitih uvjerenja (Druckman i McGrath, 2019; Tappin i sur., 2020).”
Background
Reinforcing Influence of Ideology on News Selection and Societal Perceptions: The COVID Pandemic in Sweden
Andersson, D. (2024) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990241261721
Motivated Social Cognition About Social Justice
Hennes, E. P., Dang, L., & Jost, J. T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.37
Kunda (1990): Motiviertes Denken
Einwiller, S. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-45292-6_36
Leadership and communication strategies for managing organisational change: insights from eThekwini automobile dealerships
Chukwuma, N., & Zondo, R. W. D. (2024) · International Journal of Business Ecosystem and Strategy (2687-2293) · doi:10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.546
Affektive Polarisierung und ökonomisches Wählen
Stövsand, L.-C. (2024) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · doi:10.21248/gups.88336
Updating Climate Beliefs Based on Latest IPCC Report Points to Increased Willingness to ActPreprint
Freeman, M., Groom, B., Nesje, F., & Wagner, G. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5133314
When Do Broken Campaign Promises Matter? Evidence From Four Experiments
Zoizner, A., & Amsalem, E. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612251317261
“Overall, these results are consistent with a growing literature indicating that the impact of campaign information on citizens’ attitudes is highly contingent and often limited (e.g., Broockman and Kalla 2023; Druckman and McGrath 2019; Naurin et al. 2019a).”
Meditation, Not Information? A Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism
Ramstetter, L., Klackl, J., Jonas, E., & Spilker, G. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-025-02525-8
“…climate skeptics with information on climate change often results in backfire effects that increase (rather than reduce) climate skepticism (Druckman & McGrath, 2019) and might, at least partially, explain the inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between education and climate…”
Does the media respond to political messaging? Evidence from local newspaper coverage of climate change
Beattie, G., & Meyer, A. G. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103349
From Sundanese tradition to global solution: The role of Pikukuh Sundanese Indigenous people in fostering environmental citizenship
Dwiputra, D. F. K., & Maryani, E. (2025) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1462/1/012072
“From the various complexities of its causes, it is undeniable that human activity is the main actor triggering climate change [5], [6], [7].”
Public Good vs. Private Gain: Unpacking Willingness to Pay for Programmable Heating ThermostatsPreprint
Kaestner, K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5199328
The climate battle in America
Gaele, C., Okonski, L., & Martínez-Cruz, A. L. (2025) · Metaphor and the Social World · doi:10.1075/msw.24015.gae
Climate Change and the Covid-19 Pandemic: Testing for Motivated ReasoningPreprint
Eßer, J., Flörchinger, D., Frondel, M., & Sommer, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5235597
Updating Climate Beliefs Based on Latest Ipcc Report Points to Increased Willingness to Invest in the Clean Energy TransitionPreprint
Freeman, M., Groom, B., Nesje, F., & Wagner, G. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5282318
Self-persuasion does not imply self-deception
Zhang, Y., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106215
Exploring the intersection of religion, religiosity, ideology and climate change perception of Americans
Martı́n, J. C., & Indelicato, A. (2025) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-025-02248-x
“Different religious traditions may vary in their emphasis on environmental protection, with some advocating for active engagement in climate activism, while others may pri-oritise spiritual teachings over environmental concerns (Hulme 2009; Druckman and McGrath 2019).”
Can Organized Deliberation Reduce Confirmation Bias?
Herne, K., Grönlund, K., & Söderlund, P. J. (2025) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.1617 · Cited by 1
War on fake news? Media skepticism and exposure to politicians’ fake news accusations
Lee, N. Y., & Park, A. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2531128
“These findings align with previous research that suggest conservatives were more drawn to media criticism compared to liberals and conservative politicians were more likely to utilize fake news accusations (Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
Adapting Finnish dairy production to a warmer climate: Insights from producers and buyersPreprint
Rimhanen, K., Pirttioja, N., Carter, T. R., Fronzek, S., Kautto, N., & Palosuo, T. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6922846/v1
Money Can't Buy Accuracy: Incentives Fail to Reduce the Confirmation Bias in Data InterpretationPreprint
Govindan, P., Chung, E., & Pechenkina, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5384442
Are Policymakers Persuaded in Parallel?: Policymakers, Evidence, and Motivated Reasoning
Bergan, D. E., Amakoh, K. O., Carnahan, D., Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., & Teinowitz, L. (2025) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x251367389
“Recent critiques of the literature on motivated reasoning have argued that making empirical distinctions between directional and accuracy-based reasoning is challenging, as some evidence claimed to be indicative of motivated reasoning is consistent with Bayesian updating (Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
‘Sea-level rise won’t affect my house’ – even flood maps don’t sway Florida coastal residents
Palm, R. I., & Bolsen, T. (2020) · doi:10.64628/aai.pteqc7j3m
Perceptions of Ethnic Minority Discrimination: Statistics and Stories Move Majorities
Dinesen, P. T., Vandeweerdt, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425100525 · Cited by 1
“Perhaps most straightforwardly, from the perspective of Bayesian updating, more credible information increases the likelihood of updating perceptions in the direction of the provided information (Coppock 2023; Druckman and McGrath 2019).”
Who is concerned about climate change when forests are burning? Evidence from Swedish forest firesPreprint
Hu, X. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5434171
Do conspiracy-theory interventions rest on a mistake?
Colyvan, M., Smartt, T., & Tierney, H. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05257-3
Debunking the Climate Sceptic and the Threat of Self‐Defeat
Mudry, L. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.70049
Adaptation Techniques to Irrigation Water Shortages Due to Climate Change
Hefzy, M., Mahmoud, G. A., Soltan, N. M. A., & Abdelrhman, A. A. (2025) · Sustainability Sciences in Asia and Africa · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9630-7_9
Deepening, Bridging, and Moving Minds in Stressful Times
Stocker, S., Bächtiger, A., Kittel, B., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425100562
“Again, this is in line with the latest findings in psychology (see Druckman and McGrath 2019).”
Top politicians’ motivations to seek counter-attitudinal information
Verleyen, E., & Soontjens, K. (2025) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-025-00403-8
“Abundant empirical work on citizens has shown that people generally tend to select information that is in line with their own attitudes (Epley & Gilovich 2016; Car-penter 2019; Druckman and McGrath 2019).”
Is Extreme Weather a Catalyst for Climate Consensus?Preprint
Maglicic, M., de Vasconcelos, V. V. L., & Constantino, S. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5613151
Messages from co-partisan elected officials can increase climate mitigation intentions without changing climate beliefs
Wu, V. Y. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64678-3
“Andevenifbeliefsaboutclimate change can be slowly in ﬂ uenced over time 5,12,26,28 , the urgency of the climate crisis 60,61 demands interventions that directly shift behavior.”
(Un-)scientifically Spun: Narratives, Belief Updating, and Pro-Environmental Behavior
Banerjee, A., & Momsen, K. (2025) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-025-01045-2
“Secondly, recent research suggests that the evidence for motivated reasoning as the sole explanation for shifts in climate change beliefs is mixed (Druckman and McGrath 2019; Bayes and Druckman 2021).”
United we stand, divided we fall: social differences in climate efficacy and beliefs among young people in Flanders
Pauwels, F., Horckmans, R., Spruyt, B., & Siongers, J. (2025) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2025.2592166
“Although research specifically related to climate preferences remains inconclusive (Druckman and McGrath 2019), motivated reasoning will be more problematic if the knowledge measures explicitly focus on climate issues.”
Politically Knowledgeable or Directional (Mis)Believers? How to Identify Those Who Are correct About Political Facts for the “Wrong” Reasons
Lindgren, E., Glogger, I., Theorin, N., Boomgaarden, H. G., Lindholm, T., & Strömbäck, J. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502251392780
“…on the framework of constraints, we propose distinguishing evidence-aligned beliefs (knowledge) from directional beliefs empirically, by examining response patterns across factual claims, thereby avoiding rigid assumptions about the underlying epistemic motivations (e.g., Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
Influential
Can People be Made More Rational? Testing Whether People’s Ability to Assess Arguments can be Enhanced
Friberg‐Fernros, H., Lundmark, S., Theorin, N., Ahlbom, J., & Oscarsson, H. E. (2025) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-025-09683-y
Attitudes unchanged: no support for increased climate change beliefs, concerns, or voting intentions after Hurricane Helene
Bergquist, M., & Скипор, С. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ae2f91
Additional file 1 of The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of “fake news”
Michael, R. B., & Breaux, B. O. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13979164
Learning from Economists: Climate Change Policies in Petro-Rich EconomiesPreprint
Toews, G., & Suvorov, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5996039
A model of moral balancing under motivated reasoning
Flörchinger, D. (2026) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107393
¿Negacionismo y errores cognitivos? El origen social de las preferencias
Ganuza, E., & Ramos, A. (2026) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.193.53-70
“En otras palabras, el razonamiento del individuo estaría aquí guiado por un objetivo previo a los hechos observados (Druckman y McGrath, 2019).”
Validating Vote-by-Mail Ballots: The Subjective Nature of Signature Verification
Shino, E., & Smith, D. A. (2026) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129261417974
“This is different from motivated reasoning, as they may be trying to form an accurate belief, but varying in what they determine to be “ credible evidence ” (Druckman and McGrath 2019, 112).”
Understanding Incorrectness: Structural and Ideologic Predictors of Public Knowledge About MAID Legality in the U.S.
Kozlov, E., Nemeth, S., Luth, E. A., Becker, T. D., & Duberstein, P. R. (2026) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-026-10211-1
Own trade-off and synergy beliefs, not others’, drive public acceptance of energy technologies
Montfort, S., Schmid, J. J., Campfens, J. K. E. K., Stadelmann‐Steffen, I., & Binder, C. R. (2026) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ae3dfb
“After exposure to new information, individuals form so-called posterior beliefs, which reflect their revised (i.e. updated) view [16].”
Information about climate transition risk and bank lendingPreprint
Sharma, B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6173270
Do Facts Matter? Consumer Misperceptions About Adopting Electrification Technologies
Attari, S. Z., Motz, B. A., Mishra, A., Brautigam, G. K., Trapp, T., & Graham, J. D. (2026) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-026-04120-9
“Closely related is motivated reasoning (Kunda 1990 ), where people arrive at desirable conclusions they want to arrive at when they assess information, while rejecting credible information because it counters their standing beliefs (Druckman and McGrath 2019 ).”
The economics and psychology of carbon tax acceptance Evidence from a randomized survey experimentPreprint
Fang, X., & Innocenti, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6182861
What Drives Inaction on Climate Change? A Review of the LiteraturePreprint
Fares, D., Fallucchi, F., & Manzoni, E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6247500
When the Crowd Agrees(or Not): Topic Effects and Reason Distributions in X's Community Notes
Sumioku, H., & Shibuya, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11400973
“Motivated reasoning and cultural cognition predict entrenched division on identity-laden issues (elections, vaccines, climate), limiting uniform efficacy of corrections and implying that how reasons are framed may gate consensus even within a topic [19], [20].”
Reconsidering deepfake priming: effects on belief and sharing across media platforms
Deng, R., Ahmed, S., & Kang, H. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-06-2025-0411
The Influence of the Frames of International Nuclear Pollution Issue on Chinese Publics Pro-environmental Behavioral Intentions
刘, 毅., 邵, 远., 郑, 籽., & 姜, 晓. (2025) · Global Journal of Media Studies · doi:10.26599/gjms.2025.9330073
The economics and psychology of carbon tax acceptance Evidence from a randomized survey experimentPreprint
Fang, X., & Innocenti, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6515175
Updating in parallel under threat : cues, emotions, frames, and memories
Georgarakis, G. N. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e0cecd3az44daz4250za25czc075b31d59ab
Balancing visibility with vigilance: The neutral advantage in framing transgender athletes
Hopkins, A., & Saks, J. (2026) · News Research Journal · doi:10.1177/30497841261438430
“Druckman and McGrath (2019) show that on contentious cultural issues, audiences evaluate information in ways that protect their preexisting attitudes rather than update them.”
Framing sustainability proposals: A toolkit for unlocking internal support
Lockhart, A. J., & Heslin, P. A. (2026) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2026.101230
Dysfunctional Ignorance
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0006
Creating Ignorance through Absences
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0010
Closing Gaps and Making Connections
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0012
Preface
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.002.0005
Deciding What (Not) to Know
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0009
Dedication
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.002.0004
Through a Live Elections Dashboard, Darkly: Managing Expectations and Trust in Progressive Vote Counting During the 2024 U.S. Election
Cai, M., Wang, G., Mortenson, C. R., Yang, F., Nisbet, E. C., & Kay, M. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3793385
“6.3), which may act as “perceptual screens” (theoretical filters that distort how political partisans view the world even when confronted with the same set of facts [23]).”
Influential
What Are We Missing?
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0002
Creating Ignorance through Falsehoods
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0011
How the Unconscious Thinks
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0005
Probabilism in Psychology
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0007
What the Unconscious Knows
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0004
We Didn’t Evolve in Casinos
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0008
Ignorance Studies, Where Is Psychology?
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0001
What Do We Think Others Are Missing?
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0003
Exposing the Source of Disinformation as a Means of Countering Anti-vaccine Propaganda
Rędzio, A. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18151-0_8
Participation Builds Trust, Not Framing: Insights from a National Energy-Transition ExperimentPreprint
Goes, K., Thepaut, L. D., Mouter, N., Chappin, E. J. L., & Kluiving, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6636970
Disentangling the Two Cognitive Outcomes of Corrective Information: The Role of Motivation, Cognitive Abilities, and Partisanship in Recall and Belief
Lee, T. (2026) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2026.2657376
“…is anticipated to strengthen the effects of accuracy motivation because people with accuracy motivations do not always process information in an objectively accurate manner, unless they have the ability to discern factual from false information (i.e., analytic thinking; Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
Influential
Decision-Making Under Organized Irresponsibility: Climate Change and Extreme WeatherPreprint
Martin, A., Shwom, R., Constantino, S. M., Cooperman, A. D., & Weber, E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6665189
“They Check Facts” vs. “Claptrap!”: How the American Public Conceptualizes Fact-Checking
Koo, A. Z.-X., Kim, J., Feng, M., Yang, S., & Rojas, H. (2026) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2026.2659858
“…are naturally more prone to this directionally motivated reasoning than liberals (Flynn et al., 2017; Hameleers & van der Meer, 2020; Li et al., 2024; Miller et al., 2016), which influenced behaviors like voting (Lodge & Taber, 2013) and climate attitude formation (Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
Do as I intend to do: Effects of source and audience behavioral commitment on responses to environmental criticism
McCrea, S. M., & Thürmer, J. L. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103054
Shaping Interpersonal Communication About Persuasive Media Campaigns by Inducing Critical Versus Collective Orientations
Li, S. S., & Dillard, J. P. (2026) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502261441102
Government's economic management and citizen satisfaction: a Partisan Disconfirmation Model
Banda, L. G., & Yakubu, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2026.1719133
Seeing the same evidence differently: Biased assimilation and moral conviction in public evaluations of scientific expertise
Bayes, R. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70146
“Thus, we can observe results consistent with directional motivated reasoning but cannot confirm its role (Druckman & McGrath, 2019).”
I Don’t Believe Misinformation, But I Might Share It: Inoculation Effects in Messenger Communication
Ancina, A., Zumbrägel, J., & Krämer, N. (2026) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051261449194
“Given that climate change is highly polarized (Druckman & McGrath, 2019), strong prior attitudes and underlying political preferences may have constrained inoculation effects.”
Susceptibility to misinformation as a signal detection problem
Gawronski, B., Ng, N. L., Nahon, L. S., Hubeny, T. J., & Wurzinger, F. M. (2026) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2026.2675803
Beliefs, evidence, and climate action
Freeman, M., Groom, B., Nesje, F., & Wagner, G. (2026) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109404
The Environment in the City and Social-Ecological Uncertainty
Cartaxo, T. D. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23840-5_2
Knowing the process as a pathway to trusting the outcome: System awareness and resistance to vaccine conspiracy theories
Cosgrove, T. J., Spence, J. L., Pearson, S. G., & Hornsey, M. J. (2026) · Vaccine X · doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2026.100851
Closing the Perception Gap: How Corrective Information Can Reduce Misperceptions of the Link Between Immigrant Background and Crime
Lindgren, E., Theorin, N., & Strömbäck, J. (2026) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2026.2683620 · Cited by 1
“Some may engage in politically motivated reasoning, using their cognitive resources to defend their political allies (Druckman & McGrath, 2019; Taber & Lodge, 2006), while others might believe the correction, yet reject it as a form of “political cheerleading” (Peterson & Iyengar, 2021).”
Longtime Exxon CEO Lee Raymond’s legacy of climate denial and misinformation lives on – a psychologist offers ways to counter it
Árvai, J. (2026) · doi:10.64628/aai.3dp9nmgcv
Patterns between evidence seeking behaviors, reasoning, and cognitive reflection: A supervised clustering approach
Tovissodé, C. F., Justwan, F., & Baumgaertner, B. O. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0352096
“…are given , we can isolate pre-defined (social) psychological variables that impact how the information is processed , as exemplified by results in motivated reasoning [8–11] or cultural cognition [12,13]. and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.”
Opinion Polarisation in Social Networks
Maksymov, I. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25965-3_2
Believing What We Want? Myside Bias and the Role of Open Science Practices in Public Trust in Science
Brohmer, H., Gehm, F., & von Götz, S. A. (2026) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470261475540
Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?
Lassetter, B., Hutchins, N. A., Butler, L. P., & Cimpian, A. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106629
Reasonably partisan: Bayesian belief updating in politically charged contextsPreprint
Sanna, G. A., Pilditch, T. D., & Lagnado, D. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7070489
From triggering reflective thinking to causing backlash: how experienced argument exposure frequency and balance affect political tolerance in the context of climate action
Ryffel, Q., & Zerback, T. (2026) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edag014
To Trust the Time Traveller: Expert Consensus, Partisan Identity, and the Capture of Economic Facts Citizens cannot CheckPreprint
Tamtam, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6969598
Allied Health Care Professional Susceptibility to Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Systematic Review
Miluk, B., & Gosa, M. M. (2026) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2026.2701885

Authors: Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C.
Affiliations: Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author: Druckman, James N.
ORCID: Druckman, James N.
McGrath, Mary C.
Venue: Nature Climate Change
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2019-01-21
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
Pages: 111-119
ISSN: 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
1758-6798
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1
OpenAlex: W2902092972
Cited by: 733
References: 98
Citations by year: 2026: 105 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 21
FWCI: 159.48
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords: motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, belief updating, Bayesian updating, information credibility, partisanship, belief accuracy, science communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks