Cited by 122COVID-19 and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSocial impacts of COVID-19

Adolescents’ Psychosocial Well-Being One Year after the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Norway

Open access
von Soest, Tilmann, Kozák, Michal, Rodríguez-Cano, Rubén, Fluit, Sam, Cortés-García, Laura, Ulset, Vidar S., Haghish, E. F., Bakken, Anders·2022·Nature Human Behaviour

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically restricted adolescents' lives. We used nationwide Norwegian survey data from 2014-2021 (N = 227,258; ages 13-18) to examine psychosocial outcomes in adolescents before and during the pandemic. Multilevel models revealed higher depressive symptoms and less optimistic future life expectations during the pandemic, even when accounting for the measures' time trends. Moreover, alcohol and cannabis use decreased, and screen time increased. However, the effect sizes of all observed changes during the pandemic were small. Overall, conduct problems and satisfaction with social relationships remained stable. Girls, younger adolescents and adolescents from low socio-economic backgrounds showed more adverse changes during the pandemic. Estimated changes in psychosocial outcomes varied little with municipality infection rates and restrictions. These findings can inform means and interventions to reduce negative psychological outcomes associated with the pandemic and identify groups that need particular attention during and after the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-021-01255-w

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent restrictions led to an increase in mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression.

    “The emergence of the COVID-19 virus and the subsequent restrictions enacted by over 180 countries [1] have led to an increase in mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression [2,3,4,5,6]”

    From Virtual Reality for Addressing Depression and Anxiety: A Bibliometric Analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion reports increased depressive symptoms among Norwegian adolescents one year into the pandemic. The Previous research section says adolescent anxiety symptoms remained stable in the longitudinal studies it discusses, while the Discussion says stricter local restrictions were not related to the study’s psychosocial well-being measures other than smoking. The source therefore supports an increase in depressive symptoms, but not the attributed increase in anxiety or a specific effect of restrictions on mental health. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bann, D. et al. Changes in the behavioural determinants of health during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: gender, socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in 5 British cohort studies. medRxiv, doi: 10.1101/2020.1107.1129.20164244 (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Soest, T., Kozák, M., Rodríguez-Cano, R., Fluit, S., Cortés-García, L., Ulset, V. S., Haghish, E. F., & Bakken, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
217-228
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206674925
Cited by
122
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 20
FWCI
26.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (300816, 301010, 288083)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents, psychosocial well-being, depressive symptoms, optimism, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, screen time, conduct problems, interpersonal relationships, gender differences, age differences, socioeconomic status, pandemic restrictions, Norway
MeSH terms
Screen Time, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Norway, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review