Cited by 1,436COVID-19 and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDigital Mental Health Interventions

Risk and protective factors for prospective changes in adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Magson, Natasha R., Freeman, Justin Y. A., Rapee, Ronald M., Richardson, Cele E., Oar, Ella L., Fardouly, Jasmine·2021·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

The restrictions put in place to contain the COVID-19 virus have led to widespread social isolation, impacting mental health worldwide. These restrictions may be particularly difficult for adolescents, who rely heavily on their peer connections for emotional support. However, there has been no longitudinal research examining the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescents' mental health, and moderators of change, as well as assessing the factors perceived as causing the most distress. Two hundred and forty eight adolescents (M age = 14.4; 51% girls; 81.8% Caucasian) were surveyed over two time points; in the 12 months leading up to the COVID-19 outbreak (T1), and again two months following the implementation of government restrictions and online learning (T2). Online surveys assessed depressive symptoms, anxiety, and life satisfaction at T1 and T2, and participants' schooling, peer and family relationships, social connection, media exposure, COVID-19 related stress, and adherence to government stay-at-home directives at T2 only. In line with predictions, adolescents experienced significant increases in depressive symptoms and anxiety, and a significant decrease in life satisfaction from T1 to T2, which was particularly pronounced among girls. Moderation analyses revealed that COVID-19 related worries, online learning difficulties, and increased conflict with parents predicted increases in mental health problems from T1 to T2, whereas adherence to stay-at-home orders and feeling socially connected during the COVID-19 lockdown protected against poor mental health. This study provides initial longitudinal evidence for the decline of adolescent's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results suggest that adolescents are more concerned about the government restrictions designed to contain the spread of the virus, than the virus itself, and that those concerns are associated with increased anxiety and depressive symptoms, and decreased life satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

21 of 41 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    The increase in parental conflict and decrease in mental health may reflect a developmental discrepancy between adolescents' drive to connect with peers and seek autonomy from parents while being ordered to stay at home.

    “This increase in parental conflict and decrease in mental health may reflect a developmental discrepancy between adolescents’ inherent drive to connect with peers and seek greater autonomy from their parents (Somerville 2013), while at the same time being ordered to stay at home and physically distance from their friends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Somerville 2013 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The pre-pandemic to intra-pandemic increase in depressive symptoms and anxiety, and decrease in life satisfaction found in the current study is generally consistent with previous retrospective and cross-sectional studies.

    “The pre-pandemic to intra-pandemic increase in depressive symptoms and anxiety, and decrease in life satisfaction found in the current study is generally consistent with previous retrospective and cross-sectional studies in both adult and adolescent samples, which have reported perceived increases in depression, anxiety, and loneliness due to the effects of COVID-19 (Chen et al. 2020; Wang et al.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al. 2020 source

      In the paper’s main text (page not provided), the April 2020 cross-sectional questionnaire identifies depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19. It does not compare symptoms with a pre-pandemic baseline or report perceived increases, loneliness, or life satisfaction. It therefore supports the citation’s adolescent depression-and-anxiety context, but not those more specific findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      The Discussion reports depressive and anxiety symptoms during the initial COVID-19 outbreak in a cross-sectional sample of the general public in China. It does not report perceived increases from pre-pandemic levels or assess loneliness or life satisfaction; those parts of the attributed finding are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • Findingown data

    COVID-19 distress moderated increases in depressive symptoms from T1 to T2.

    “COVID-19 distress | 9.00 | 0.031 | 3.34 | 6.47 (246) | <0.001”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    COVID-19 distress moderated decreases in life satisfaction from T1 to T2.

    “5.56 | 0.022 | −0.09 | 2.36 (245) | 0.019”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Difficulties with online learning moderated increases in depressive symptoms from T1 to T2.

    “Difficulties online | 4.53 | 0.018 | 3.48 | 5.26 (244) | <0.001”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • May combine two claims. 37
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A Chinese two-wave study detected no reliable shifts in depression, anxiety, or stress across its observation window.

    “One study surveyed 1738 Chinese participants at two time points following the commencement of the pandemic and found no significant changes across time in depression, anxiety and stress over the study period (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Methods §2.1 describes a cross-sectional survey, and Results §3.2 reports 1,210 completed questionnaires—not 1,738 participants surveyed twice. The Discussion explicitly says the authors could not conduct a prospective study of the same participants, so this paper cannot establish whether depression, anxiety, or stress changed over time. (LLM, conf=0.93)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Within that sample, adolescents and young adults aged 12-21 saw COVID-19 as more impactful than adults aged 50-59.

    “However, there was some indication that younger people (aged 12–21 years) perceived the impact of COVID-19 to be greater than older adults (aged 50–59 years).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Section 3.3 (page unavailable) says age was not associated with psychological-impact scores. It reports higher scores for students than employed respondents, but does not find that people aged 12–21 experienced greater impact than those aged 50–59. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During adolescence, emotionality is heightened by neural changes while self-regulation remains underdeveloped.

    “This is due in part, to the physical and chemical changes occurring in the brain from early adolescence, which result in a ‘neural mismatch’ whereby emotionality is heightened in response to real and/or perceived stressors (Bailen et al. 2019), yet the self-regulatory system required to manage these emotions remains largely underdeveloped until early adulthood (Somerville et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bailen et al. 2019 source
    • cites Somerville et al. 2010 source

      In “Brain mechanisms of reduced top-down control over responses to salient cues in adolescents” (page not provided), the paper says prefrontal regulatory control remains relatively immature during adolescence compared with adulthood. It does not establish that the self-regulatory system remains largely underdeveloped until early adulthood, the specific endpoint attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lockdown measures intended to curb COVID-19 produced broad social isolation, with potentially serious effects on mental health.

    “Government restrictions put in place to slow the spread of the virus have led to widespread social isolation, which can have profound consequences for mental health (Brooks et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brooks et al. 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social sensitivity and peer importance increase markedly in adolescence, with friends becoming the main source of interaction and influence.

    “Another defining characteristic of adolescence is the marked increase in social sensitivity and the importance of peers (Somerville 2013). As adolescents strive for independence from their parents, the time spent with peers increases dramatically, and for the first time, friends rather than parents become the primary source of interaction and influence (Meuwese et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Somerville 2013 source
    • cites Meuwese et al. 2017 source

      The paper’s introductory passage (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) says adolescents spend increasingly more time with peers and have greater social exposure to friends than in early childhood. It does not say that this increase is dramatic, link it to independence from parents, or establish that friends become the primary source of interaction and influence rather than parents. The separate statement about social sensitivity is cited to Somerville, not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the same Chinese sample, thinking the virus spread easily and seeing more health media both correlated with depression and/or anxiety at each wave.

    “Beliefs about the ease of virus transmission and increased media exposure to health information about COVID-19 were significantly associated with depression and/or anxiety at both time points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Section 3.10 (page not provided) reports associations between requests for COVID-19 health information and lower anxiety or depression scores. But the Methods describe one survey from 31 January to 2 February 2020, not two waves; the cited results do not establish associations at both time points, or an association for beliefs about how easily the virus spreads. Requests for information are also not the same as increased media exposure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Across 13 studies of healthcare staff, pooled estimates showed 23.2% with raised COVID-19 anxiety, 22.8% with depression, and 38.9% with insomnia.

    “A meta-analysis of 13 studies of mental health among healthcare workers found that almost a quarter exhibited elevated COVID-19 related symptoms of anxiety (23.2%) and depression (22.8%), and more than a third (38.9%) experienced problems with insomnia (Pappa et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pappa et al. 2020 source

      The Results report 13 included studies, with pooled anxiety prevalence of 23.21% and depression prevalence of 22.8%. The Results > Insomnia prevalence section instead reports 34.32%, not 38.9%; only five of the 13 studies contributed insomnia data. (LLM, conf=0.94)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chinese adolescents showed elevated depression and anxiety at the pandemic peak, but boys and those exercising often had lower scores.

    “Another study also found high levels of depression and anxiety in Chinese adolescents during the peak of the pandemic, although lower levels were reported among males and youth that regularly engaged in exercise (Chen et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al. 2020 source

      The study’s results (page not provided) report depression and anxiety cases among adolescents surveyed in Guiyang, China, in April 2020. Table 1 shows lower rates of both conditions among males and adolescents reporting regular physical exercise. The paper does not establish that the survey occurred at the pandemic’s peak or report lower mean symptom scores for those groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a Chinese sample of 1210 people, over 50% described COVID-19's effect on their mental health as moderate or severe.

    “research conducted among 1210 respondents during the early stages of the crisis in China found that more than half (53.8%) rated the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their psychological health as moderate to severe (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The same study found protective effects for preventive behaviors, following stay-at-home rules, and believing one was unlikely to catch or die from COVID-19.

    “In contrast, taking precautionary measures to avoid transmission (e.g., regular handwashing), complying with the stay-at-home orders, and low perceived likelihood of contracting and dying from COVID-19 were all found to be protective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Results §§3.8–3.9 (page unavailable) associate handwashing and other precautions with lower psychological distress, and low perceived likelihood of infection with lower stress and anxiety. They also associate low perceived likelihood of surviving infection with higher stress. But the paper reports how long respondents stayed home, not that complying with stay-at-home orders was psychologically protective; it also finds higher perceived likelihood of infection associated with a lower psychological-impact score. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A Chinese study found that rises in generalized anxiety tied to COVID-19 were larger among those younger than 35 than among older groups.

    “A second study in China reported COVID-19 related increases in generalized anxiety, which were found to be more pronounced in younger people (<35 years) compared to older age groups (Huang and Zhao 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang and Zhao 2020 source

      The Results report that participants under 35 were more likely to have GAD during the outbreak than those 35 and older (adjusted odds ratio 1.65). That supports the age-group comparison, but not a comparison of increases: the Discussion says the cross-sectional study could not assess participants’ psychological conditions before the outbreak. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Adolescents left alone at home all day reported significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety than those who were accompanied by a parent or relative.

    “The importance of feeling socially connected during the pandemic has been demonstrated previously when it was found that adolescents left alone at home all day reported significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety than those who were accompanied by a parent or relative (Chen et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al. 2020 source

      The Results table (Table 1) reports significantly higher percentages of depression and anxiety among adolescents not accompanied on a workday, and the discussion describes them as more likely to be depressed and anxious. The paper does not specify that the companion was a parent or relative, or establish that the adolescents were alone all day. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Adults expressed the greatest concern over family members contracting COVID-19.

    “these findings contrast with research in adults, as adults expressed the greatest concern over family members contracting COVID-19 (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Results §3.8 reports that 75.2% of respondents worried about other family members contracting COVID-19, compared with 50.9% who worried about a child under 16. It does not establish that family infection was their greatest concern overall; the reported comparisons do not cover every concern. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous research found an association between taking precautionary measures to avoid contracting the virus and lower levels of depression and anxiety.

    “This is consistent with previous research which also found an association between that taking precautionary measures (e.g., staying at home, wearing a mask) to avoid contracting the virus and lower levels of depression and anxiety (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Results §3.9 reports that wearing masks was associated with lower anxiety and depression scores, and the Discussion describes similar associations for several precautionary measures. The paper reports that most respondents stayed at home to avoid COVID-19, but does not report that staying home was associated with lower anxiety or depression. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent study in China found that greater depression and anxiety were associated with exposure to radio reports around COVID-19, but the same effect was not found in relation to television and internet reports.

    “A recent study in China found that although greater depression and anxiety were associated with exposure to radio reports around COVID-19, the same effect was not found in relation to television and internet reports (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Results §3.7 (page unavailable) says the Internet was the most common source of COVID-19 health information, but does not link any reporting channel to depression or anxiety. Searches for radio and television found no comparison of their associations with those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some research suggests that associations between media exposure and internalizing distress are nuanced.

    “Although there is no clear explanation for the contradictory findings between the current and previous studies, some research suggests that associations between media exposure and internalizing distress are nuanced (Wang et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Results §3.7 and the Discussion (page not provided) link satisfaction with COVID-19 health information to psychological distress and report that the Internet was the primary information channel. The Discussion also links particular types of information to lower stress or anxiety, consistent with a nuanced relationship. But the paper does not report an association between the amount or frequency of media exposure and distress. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The current findings are broadly consistent with previous findings in that social media posts about COVID-19 were not associated with changes in mental health, whereas reading and watching media reports were positively related to good mental health.

    “These findings are broadly consistent with those found in the current study in that social media posts about COVID-19 were not associated with changes in mental health, whereas reading and watching media reports were positively related to good mental health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Following stay-at-home rules was protective against mental health problems during lockdown.

    “adherence to stay-at-home orders and feeling socially connected during the COVID-19 lockdown protected against poor mental health”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Sex moderated the change in anxiety from T1 to T2, with girls showing greater increases.

    “which was particularly pronounced among girls.”
    • Also stated in: § Potential Moderating Factors · plain
      “4.19 | 0.017 | 2.18 | 1.81 (246) | 0.041”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Sex moderated the change in depressive symptoms from T1 to T2, with girls showing greater increases.

    “which was particularly pronounced among girls.”
    • Also stated in: § Potential Moderating Factors · plain
      “Sex | 9.00 | 0.035 | 2.18 | 6.64 (246) | 0.003”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Frequency of reading posts about COVID-19 on social media had no significant effect on changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety, or life satisfaction.

    “The frequency of reading posts about COVID-19 on social media had no significant effect on changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety or life satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Those perceiving high levels of social connection during COVID-19 reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms and anxiety, and significantly more life satisfaction from T1 to T2 than those feeling socially disconnected.

    “Those perceiving high levels of social connection during COVID-19 reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms and anxiety, and significantly more life satisfaction from T1 to T2 than those feeling socially disconnected during the lockdown period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Boys and girls were similar on average life satisfaction, exposure to COVID-19 related media, and attitudes toward the impact of COVID-19 on their schooling.

    “Boys and girls were more similar on average levels of life satisfaction, exposure to COVID-19 related media, and attitudes toward the impact of COVID-19 on their schooling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most commonly reported online learning problems were technology problems, not understanding learning materials, inability to ask the teacher to explain work, and motivation problems.

    “The most commonly reported problems when learning online were related to technology problems, not understanding the learning materials, being unable to ask the teacher to explain the work, and problems with motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Experiencing difficulties with online learning moderated change in depressive symptoms, with those reporting problems having more depressive symptoms during COVID-19 than those reporting no problems.

    “However, experiencing the abovementioned difficulties with online learning did significantly moderate change in depressive symptoms, with those who experienced problems reporting significantly more depressive symptoms during COVID-19, compared to those who experienced no problems with online learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adolescents were not overly concerned with the impact that COVID-19 was having on their education, nor was this related to any of the mental health outcomes examined.

    “The current results also indicated that adolescents were not overly concerned with the impact that COVID-19 was having on their education, nor was this related to any of the mental health outcomes examined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    COVID-19 related distress and feeling socially disconnected were most strongly related to all mental health symptoms, and were significantly associated with viewing posts about COVID-19 on social media, less motivation to study, greater perceived negative impact on schooling, and greater conflict with siblings.

    “COVID-19 related distress and feeling socially disconnected from others were most strongly related to all mental health symptoms, as well as being significantly associated with viewing posts about COVID-19 on social media, less motivation to study, a greater perceived negative impact on schooling, and greater conflict with siblings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although half of the sample reported an increase in conflict with siblings, this was not associated with changes to their mental health during the lockdown period.

    “This possibility is further supported by the finding that although half of the current sample reported an increase in conflict with their siblings, this was not associated with changes to their mental health during the lockdown period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Girls reported more symptoms of depression and anxiety at both time points, whereas boys reported more familial conflict during the lockdown.

    “As expected, on average girls reported more symptoms of depression and anxiety at both time points, whereas boys reported more familial conflict during the lockdown period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adolescents' greatest concerns during the COVID-19 crisis were around the disruption to their social interactions and activities, whereas concerns around contracting or getting ill from the virus were very low.

    “Consistent with theory highlighting the importance of peers during the adolescent period, the results showed that adolescents’ greatest concerns during the COVID-19 crisis were around the disruption to their social interactions and activities, whereas concerns around contracting or getting ill from the virus were very low.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Learning exclusively online did not appear to impact adolescents' mental health, whereas difficulties encountered during online learning did.

    “Finally, and encouragingly, learning exclusively online did not appear to impact adolescents’ mental health, whereas difficulties encountered during online learning did.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater exposure to traditional media, adherence to government restrictions, and feeling socially connected with others was associated with less distress.

    “In contrast, greater exposure to traditional media, adherence to government restrictions, and feeling socially connected with others was associated with less distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In that survey, depression was higher with COVID-19 worries, reduced schoolwork time, and more friend time, but lower with more family time.

    “Further, COVID-19 related concerns, spending less time on schoolwork and more time with friends was positively associated with depression, whereas spending more time with family was negatively associated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Internalizing disorders have a typical median onset age of 13 to 19 years and have been called disorders of adolescence.

    “In fact, this particular subset of internalizing disorders has previously been referred to as “disorders of adolescence” due to their typical median onset age of 13 to 19 years (Rapee et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rapee et al. 2019 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    It is well documented that depression and anxiety differ by sex in how common and severe they are.

    “which is surprising considering the well-established sex differences in the prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety (Rose and Rudolph 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rose and Rudolph 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adolescent peer rejection or conflict can damage self-concept and self-worth and raise anxiety and depression symptoms, whereas supportive peer ties lower risk for both conditions.

    “Thus, negative peer interactions during this important developmental window can lead to poor self-concept, a low sense of worth, and subsequent increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression, whereas positive peer relationships can provide social and emotional support, which are known to protect against the risk of both depression and anxiety (La Greca and Harrison 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Connell and Wellborn 1991
    • cites La Greca and Harrison 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A Canadian youth sample, looking back, reported worse mental health-especially low mood/depression and anxiety-from three months pre-pandemic to three weeks in.

    “In a study focused on youth, retrospective reports of mental health symptoms three months prior to the pandemic were compared to those three weeks into the pandemic among 622 Canadian adolescents and young adults (Hawke et al. 2020). Participants perceived reductions in their mental health across the period, particularly in depression/low mood and anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hawke et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    That survey found social media use strengthened the link between COVID-19 worries and depression; the heaviest users had the highest depression.

    “Social media use moderated the association between COVID-19 concerns and depression, with those reporting high levels of social media use also reporting the most depression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Loneliness in that survey rose with COVID-19 worries and fell with more family time, friend time, and exercise.

    “COVID-19 related concerns were also positively associated with loneliness, while spending more time with family and friends, and engaging in more physical activity, was negatively associated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From early adolescence, depression and anxiety tend to rise while life satisfaction tends to fall.

    “Finally, as depression and anxiety are known to increase, and life satisfaction to decrease, from early adolescence onward (Goldbeck et al. 2007; Rapee et al. 2019), it is important to ensure that any potential prospective changes in mental health symptoms during COVID-19 are not simply due to age effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goldbeck et al. 2007 source
    • cites Rapee et al. 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among 1054 Canadian teens, schooling effects ranked first, then broad COVID-19 worries, then disconnection from friends.

    “Finally, a survey of 1054 Canadian adolescents (Mage = 16.68) found that adolescents were most concerned about the impact on their schooling, followed by general concerns about the COVID-19 crisis, and not feeling connected to friends (Ellis et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Prospective collection of these data allows stronger conclusions to be drawn that go beyond perceived attributions of participants.

    “More importantly, the prospective collection of these data allows stronger conclusions to be drawn, that go beyond the perceived attributions of participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The depressive symptoms measure had good reliability in this sample (α = 0.91 at T1 and 0.93 at T2).

    “The reliability of the measure was good in the current sample (α = 0.91 at T1 and 0.93 at T2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All other variables had less than 1% missing data except family conflict variables, which had non-responses of 3.2% for mother, 9.7% for father, and 7.7% for siblings.

    “All other variables contained less than 1% missing data with the exception of the family conflict variables which had a “not applicable option” for family members not living within the same household. This resulted in non-responses of 3.2% for mother, 9.7% for father, and 7.7% for siblings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The prevalence of internalizing disorders increases from early to mid-adolescence.

    “Previous research has also shown that the prevalence of internalizing disorders increases from early to mid-adolescence (Goldbeck et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldbeck et al. 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The life satisfaction measure had high internal consistency in this sample (α = 0.91 at T1 and 0.92 at T2).

    “The Cronbach’s alphas in the current study were high (α = 0.91 at T1 and 0.92 at T2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Most variables were normally distributed with no obvious skewness (−0.81 to 1.72), although kurtosis for depressive symptoms at T1 (2.21) and traditional media exposure at T2 (3.76) was slightly above recommended values.

    “As shown in Table 1, most variables were normally distributed with no obvious skewedness (−0.81 to 1.72), although the kurtosis of values of depressive symptoms at T1 (2.21) and exposure to traditional media at T2 (3.76) fell slightly above the recommended values of plus or minus two (Gravetter et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gravetter et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 467 invited adolescents, 248 (53%) returned completed responses.

    “Of the 467 adolescents invited to participate in the COVID-19 survey, 248 (53%) returned completed responses and thus comprised the current sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Pairwise deletion was used for all analyses because missing data were a small percentage.

    “Due to the small percentage of missing data, all analyses were conducted using pairwise deletion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The current study demonstrates that living with restrictions and concerns surrounding COVID-19 are related to increases in emotional distress and decreases in life satisfaction.

    “The current study strengthens and builds upon this literature by demonstrating that living with the restrictions and concerns surrounding COVID-19 are related to not only increases in emotional distress but also with decreases in life satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Generalized Anxiety subscale had acceptable internal consistency in this sample (α = 0.86 at T1 and 0.87 at T2).

    “The Cronbach’s alphas in the current study were acceptable (α = 0.86 at T1 and 0.87 at T2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The newly developed COVID-19 distress scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91.

    “The Cronbach’s alpha for the new scale was 0.91.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The difference in educational concerns may be because earlier research was carried out immediately following the switch to online learning whereas the current study assessed concerns two months after the initial change, providing students with the opportunity to adapt.

    “This may be because the earlier research was carried out immediately following the switch to online learning whereas the current study assessed concerns two months after the initial change, providing students with the opportunity to adapt and settle into their new learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previous work found that one of adolescents' most pressing COVID-19 related worries was the detriment to their education.

    “These findings are inconsistent with previous work which found that one of adolescents’ most pressing COVID-19 related worries was the detriment to their education (Ellis et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis et al. 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The observed increase in mental health symptoms from T1 to T2 cannot be simply explained by developmental differences in internalizing disorders, and may instead be due to changing social, educational and economic climate as a result of COVID-19.

    “However, the current study did not find any moderating effect of age, suggesting that the observed increase in mental health symptoms from T1 to T2 cannot be simply explained by these developmental differences, and may instead be due to the changing social, educational and economic climate as a result of COVID-19.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A large proportion of adolescents are coping well with the impact of the pandemic, at least in the early stages, and most are showing minimal negative impact.

    “Clearly a large proportion of adolescents are coping well with the impact of the pandemic, at least in the early stages, and most are showing minimal negative impact.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Data coverage for T1 and T2 mental health variables was 99.6% to 100%.

    “Data coverage for T1 and T2 mental health variables was 99.6% to 100%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adolescents can be resilient and adaptive when needed, as long as they are equipped with the necessary tools and support they require.

    “This demonstrates that adolescents can be resilient and adaptive when needed, as long as they are equipped with the necessary tools and support they require.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This research contributes to existing literature by demonstrating longitudinal declines in the mental health of adolescents, especially among girls, when comparing pre-pandemic to intra-pandemic levels.

    “Thus, this research contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating longitudinal declines in the mental health of adolescents, especially among girls, when comparing pre-pandemic to intra-pandemic levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The difference in educational concerns may also be due to the younger age of the current cohort relative to those in the earlier study.

    “It may also be due to the younger age of the current cohort relative to those in the earlier study, most of whom were in senior school—a time when grades are important in determining acceptance into university and future occupational opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The causal relationship between adherence and mental health may flow in either direction.

    “As with all of the current results, the casual relationship may flow in either direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample was predominately of Caucasian ethnicity, included participants within a restricted age range, and data were collected within a single country (Australia).

    “The sample was predominately of Caucasian ethnicity and included participants within a restricted age range, and perhaps most importantly for a study of the impacts of COVID-19, data were collected within a single country (Australia)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample used in the current study was relatively small and demographically restricted.

    “Finally, the sample used in the current study was relatively small and demographically restricted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Most of the online learning difficulties reported were modifiable and related to problems concerning technology, the understanding of learning materials, and being unable to ask the teacher for clarification.

    “Most of the online learning difficulties reported were modifiable and related to problems concerning technology, the understanding of learning materials, and being unable to ask the teacher for clarification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
64 of 64
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the time, no longitudinal study had looked at how COVID-19 affected adolescent mental health.

    “However, to date there is no longitudinal research examining the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adolescent samples had not yet been used to test developmental differences in reactions to COVID-19.

    “However to date, developmental differences in COVID-19 responses have not been examined in adolescent samples.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no longitudinal research had examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected adolescents' mental health.

    “to date, there has been no longitudinal research examining how the pandemic has impacted adolescents’ mental health”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no research had examined which demographic and COVID-19 related factors increase or decrease adolescent mental health symptoms over time.

    “research has not yet examined which demographic and COVID-19 related factors serve to increase or decrease adolescent mental health symptoms over time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social isolation, interpersonal stress, and mental health problems during adolescence can be a precursor for mental health problems across the lifespan.

    “As social isolation, interpersonal stress, and mental health problems during adolescence can be a precursor for mental health problems across the lifespan”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Government measures to contain COVID-19 physically and socially isolated adolescents from their social support networks, increasing their risk of psychological disorder.

    “Government measures put in place to contain the virus have physically and socially isolated adolescents from their friends, extended family, and other social support networks, leaving many feeling socially isolated, and consequently, at an increased risk of psychological disorder.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deteriorations in adolescent mental health from prolonged school closures have been reported in longitudinal studies, along with changes in loneliness.

    “Deteriorations in adolescent's mental health from prolonged school closures have been reported in longitudinal studies, along with changes in loneliness (Hussong et al., 2021; Magson et al., 2021).”

    From Adolescents' longitudinal trajectories of mental health and loneliness: The impact of COVID‐19 school closures (2022) · cites this paper as Magson et al., 2021

    The Results (Overall Changes in Mental Health) report longitudinal increases in depression and anxiety and a decrease in life satisfaction two months into the pandemic. But the Results (Potential Moderating Factors) say switching to exclusively online learning had no significant mental-health effect; the study does not establish that prolonged school closures caused the decline. It assessed social connectedness during lockdown, not longitudinal changes in loneliness. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Feeling connected to friends was important in mitigating the effects of lockdown protocols.

    “In general, the emerging evidence pertaining to the COVID‐19 pandemic is that feeling connected to friends was important in mitigating the effects of lockdown protocols (Ellis et al., 2020; Magson et al., 2021).”

    From Adolescents' longitudinal trajectories of mental health and loneliness: The impact of COVID‐19 school closures (2022) · cites this paper as Magson et al., 2021

    The Results (Potential Moderating Factors; page unavailable) report that adolescents who felt more socially connected during lockdown had better mental-health outcomes. But the Methods (Measures; page unavailable) define social connectedness broadly, not specifically as connection to friends, and the Discussion (Social Connection and Familial Conflict; page unavailable) says the study cannot establish whether connection mitigated distress or distress affected connection. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increase in loneliness and decline in wellbeing attributed to extraverts during the first lockdown reverses the typical pattern whereby extraversion is negatively associated with loneliness and mental health problems.

    “In contrast, the increase in loneliness and decline in wellbeing (Hussong et al., 2021; Magson et al., 2021) attributed to extraverts during the first lockdown, reverses the typical pattern of results whereby extraversion is negatively associated with loneliness and mental health problems”

    From Adolescent Loneliness and Negative Affect during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Extraversion and Neuroticism (2023) · cites this paper as Magson et al., 2021

    The Discussion (Negative Emotionality; page unavailable) reports a decline in life satisfaction among adolescents during lockdown, which supports the general wellbeing component. It does not report a measured increase in loneliness among extraverts, examine extraversion, or establish a reversal of its typical association with loneliness and mental health problems. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, while at the same time, access to treatment facilities has been restricted, resulting in a need for the quick implementation of remote or online interventions.”

    From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Abstract reports increased depressive and anxiety symptoms among 248 adolescents from before the pandemic to two months after restrictions began. The Introduction also describes a study of adolescents and young adults reporting poorer mental health. Neither passage establishes an increase in the prevalence of diagnosed mental illness across children, adolescents, and young adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Females experienced greater declines in mental health than males in Magson et al. (2021).

    “Females experienced greater declines in mental health than males, which is in line with other findings (e.g., Asanov et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Online-difficulty depression test has incompatible statistics

    Major

    The reported t of 5.26 implies F = 27.6676, not 4.53. These imply substantially different p values for a result used to support the online-learning conclusion.

    Reported 4.53 · recomputed 27.6676

  • Social-disconnection coefficients reverse the stated effects

    Major

    Table 3 labels the moderator social disconnection but gives negative coefficients for depression and anxiety and a positive coefficient for life satisfaction. Those directions say greater disconnection accompanies better changes on all three outcomes, opposite to the stated finding.

  • Sex-anxiety F and t statistics disagree

    Minor

    The anxiety moderation test reports F = 4.19, but its t statistic squared is 3.2761.

    Reported 4.19 · recomputed 3.2761

  • COVID-distress scale has two stated minimum values

    Minor

    The measure description sets the lowest rating at 1, whereas the figure caption sets it at 0.

  • Social-disconnection depression coefficient and t have opposite signs

    Minor

    The depression coefficient is negative but its reported t statistic is positive; those signs cannot both be correct for the same coefficient test.

  • COVID-distress life-satisfaction coefficient and t have opposite signs

    Minor

    The coefficient is negative while its t statistic is positive. A coefficient and its t statistic must have the same sign because the standard error is positive.

  • COVID-distress depression F and t statistics disagree

    Minor

    The reported depression t statistic implies F = 41.8609 for this one-parameter test, rather than 9.00.

    Reported 9 · recomputed 41.8609

  • Sex-depression F and t statistics disagree

    Minor

    For a one-parameter moderation test, F should equal t squared. The reported t of 6.64 gives 44.0896, not 9.00.

    Reported 9 · recomputed 44.0896

  • Social-disconnection depression F and t statistics disagree

    Minor

    Squaring the reported t gives 29.2681, rather than the reported F of 42.06.

    Reported 42.06 · recomputed 29.2681

  • Sibling-conflict anxiety F and t statistics disagree

    Minor

    The reported anxiety t of 0.75 implies F = 0.5625, not 0.11.

    Reported 0.11 · recomputed 0.5625

10 of 10

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gravetter, F., Wallnau, L., Forzano, L., & Witnauer, J. (2020). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (10 ed.). New York: Cengage Learning.
  2. IBM Corp. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics software: SPSS statistics V26. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magson, N. R., Freeman, J. Y. A., Rapee, R. M., Richardson, C. E., Oar, E. L., & Fardouly, J.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Magson, Natasha R.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2020-10-27
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
44-57
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W3095673945
Cited by
1,436
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 232 · 2023: 340 · 2022: 389 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 5
FWCI
83.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, adolescent mental health, depressive symptoms, anxiety, life satisfaction, social isolation, lockdown, online learning
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Preschool, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review