Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 749

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems

Open access
Lagadec, Marie Francine, Grimaud, Alexis·2020·Nature Materials
DOI 10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Winter, M., Barnett, B. & Xu, K. Before Li ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 118, 11433–11456 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Weninger, B. M. H. & Mulder, F. M. Renewable hydrogen and electricity dispatch with multiple Ni–Fe electrode storage. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 567–571 (2019). · DOI
  3. Bernt, M. et al. Current challenges in catalyst development for PEM water electrolyzers. Chem. Ing. Tech. 90, 31–39 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Faustini, M. et al. Hierarchically structured ultraporous iridium-based materials: a novel catalyst architecture for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1802136 (2019). · DOI
  5. Wu, T. et al. Iron-facilitated dynamic active-site generation on spinel CoAl2O4 with self-termination of surface reconstruction for water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2, 763–772 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  6. King, L. A. et al. A non-precious metal hydrogen catalyst in a commercial polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyser. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1071–1074 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kibsgaard, J. & Chorkendorff, I. Considerations for the scaling-up of water splitting catalysts. Nat. Energy 4, 430–433 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Inaba, M. et al. Benchmarking high surface area electrocatalysts in a gas diffusion electrode: measurement of oxygen reduction activities under realistic conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 988–994 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wei, C. et al. Recommended practices and benchmark activity for hydrogen and oxygen electrocatalysis in water splitting and fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1806296 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Suntivich, J., Gasteiger, H. A., Yabuuchi, N. & Shao-Horn, Y. Electrocatalytic measurement methodology of oxide catalysts using a thin-film rotating disk electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, B1263–B1268 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kroschel, M., Bonakdarpour, A., Kwan, J. T. H., Strasser, P. & Wilkinson, D. P. Analysis of oxygen evolving catalyst coated membranes with different current collectors using a new modified rotating disk electrode technique. Electrochim. Acta 317, 722–736 (2019). · DOI
  12. Bender, G. et al. Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 9174–9187 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Colli, A. N., Girault, H. H. & Battistel, A. Non-precious electrodes for practical alkaline water electrolysis. Materials 12, 1336 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Weiß, A. et al. Impact of intermittent operation on lifetime and performance of a PEM water electrolyzer. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, F487–F497 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Debe, M. K. et al. Initial performance and durability of ultra-low loaded NSTF electrodes for PEM electrolyzers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, K165–K176 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bock, R. et al. Measuring the thermal conductivity of membrane and porous transport layer in proton and anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers for temperature distribution modeling. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 1236–1254 (2019). · DOI
  17. Wang, L. et al. Electrochemically converting carbon monoxide to liquid fuels by directing selectivity with electrode surface area. Nat. Catal. 2, 702–708 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Andersen, S. Z. et al. A rigorous electrochemical ammonia synthesis protocol with quantitative isotope measurements. Nature 570, 504–508 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wakerley, D. et al. Bio-inspired hydrophobicity promotes CO2 reduction on a Cu surface. Nat. Mater. 18, 1222–1227 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Modeling gas-diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 16973–16984 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Burdyny, T. & Smith, W. A. CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1442–1453 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mayyas, A. et al. Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Fritz, K. E., Beaucage, P. A., Matsuoka, F., Wiesner, U. & Suntivich, J. Mesoporous titanium and niobium nitrides as conductive and stable electrocatalyst supports in acid environments. Chem. Commun. 53, 7250–7253 (2017). · DOI
  24. Gago, A. S. et al. Protective coatings on stainless steel bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers. J. Power Sources 307, 815–825 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ayers, K., Capuano, C. B. & Anderson, E. B. Recent advances in cell cost and efficiency for PEM-based water electrolysis. ECS Trans. 41, 15–22 (2012). · DOI
  26. Ayers, K. et al. Perspectives on low-temperature electrolysis and potential for renewable hydrogen at scale. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 10, 219–239 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Bernt, M., Siebel, A. & Gasteiger, H. A. Analysis of voltage losses in PEM water electrolyzers with low platinum group metal loadings. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F305–F314 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 267–278 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lehner, M., Tichler, R., Steinmüller, H. & Koppe, M. Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Models 19–39 (Springer, 2014). · DOI
  30. Yanagi, H. & Fukuta, K. Anion exchange membrane and ionomer for alkaline membrane fuel cells (AMFCs). ECS Trans. 16, 257–262 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Abbasi, R. et al. A roadmap to low-cost hydrogen with hydroxide exchange membrane electrolyzers. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805876 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Whiston, M. M. et al. Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4899–4904 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  33. You, B. & Sun, Y. Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1571–1580 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  34. H. Hashemi, S. M., Modestino, M. A. & Psaltis, D. A membrane-less electrolyzer for hydrogen production across the pH scale. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2003–2009 (2015). · DOI
  35. Kato, T., Kubota, M., Kobayashi, N. & Suzuoki, Y. Effective utilization of by-product oxygen from electrolysis hydrogen production. Energy 30, 2580–2595 (2005). · DOI
  36. O’Neil, G. D., Christian, C. D., Brown, D. E. & Esposito, D. V. Hydrogen production with a simple and scalable membraneless electrolyzer. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, F3012–F3019 (2016). · DOI
  37. Davis, J. T., Qi, J., Fan, X., Bui, J. C. & Esposito, D. V. Floating membraneless PV-electrolyzer based on buoyancy-driven product separation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43, 1224–1238 (2018). · DOI
  38. Hashemi, S. M. H. et al. A versatile and membrane-less electrochemical reactor for the electrolysis of water and brine. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1592–1604 (2019). · DOI
  39. Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. Decoupling hydrogen and oxygen evolution during electrolytic water splitting using an electron-coupled-proton buffer. Nat. Chem. 5, 403–409 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Rausch, B., Symes, M. D., Chisholm, G. & Cronin, L. Decoupled catalytic hydrogen evolution from a molecular metal oxide redox mediator in water splitting. Science 345, 1326–1330 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Mulder, F. M., Weninger, B. M. H., Middelkoop, J., Ooms, F. G. B. & Schreuders, H. Efficient electricity storage with a battolyser, an integrated Ni-Fe battery and electrolyser. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 756–764 (2017). · DOI
  42. Chen, L., Dong, X., Wang, Y. & Xia, Y. Separating hydrogen and oxygen evolution in alkaline water electrolysis using nickel hydroxide. Nat. Commun. 7, 11741 (2016).
  43. Amstutz, V. et al. Renewable hydrogen generation from a dual-circuit redox flow battery. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2350–2358 (2014). · DOI
  44. Peljo, P. et al. All-vanadium dual circuit redox flow battery for renewable hydrogen generation and desulfurisation. Green. Chem. 19, 1785–1797 (2016). · doi:10.1039/c5gc02196k
  45. Gillespie, M. I., Van Der Merwe, F. & Kriek, R. J. Performance evaluation of a membraneless divergent electrode-flow-through (DEFT) alkaline electrolyser based on optimisation of electrolytic flow and electrode gap. J. Power Sources 293, 228–235 (2015). · DOI
  46. Gillespie, M. I. & Kriek, R. J. Hydrogen production from a rectangular horizontal filter press Divergent Electrode-Flow-Through (DEFTTM) alkaline electrolysis stack. J. Power Sources 372, 252–259 (2017). · DOI
  47. Dotan, H. et al. Decoupled hydrogen and oxygen evolution by a two-step electrochemical–chemical cycle for efficient overall water splitting. Nat. Energy 4, 786–795 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Palacín, M. R. & De Guibert, A. Batteries: Why do batteries fail? Science 351, 1253292 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Pavel, C. C. et al. Highly efficient platinum group metal free based membrane-electrode assembly for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 126, 1402–1405 (2014). · DOI
  50. Parrondo, J. et al. Degradation of anion exchange membranes used for hydrogen production by ultrapure water electrolysis. RSC Adv. 4, 9875–9879 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Gardner, G. et al. Structural basis for differing electrocatalytic water oxidation by the cubic, layered and spinel forms of lithium cobalt oxides. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 184–192 (2016). · DOI
  52. Yoon, Y., Yan, B. & Surendranath, Y. Suppressing ion transfer enables versatile measurements of electrochemical surface area for intrinsic activity comparisons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2397–2400 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Dubouis, N. & Grimaud, A. The hydrogen evolution reaction: From material to interfacial descriptors. Chem. Sci. 10, 9165–9181 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Garcia, A. C., Touzalin, T., Nieuwland, C., Perini, N. & Koper, M. T. M. Enhancement of oxygen evolution activity of nickel oxyhydroxide by electrolyte alkali cations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 12999–13003 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Babic, U., Suermann, M., Büchi, F. N., Gubler, L. & Schmidt, T. J. Critical review—identifying critical gaps for polymer electrolyte water electrolysis development. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, F387–F399 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Harrison, K. & Levene, J. I. in Solar Hydrogen Generation: Toward a Renewable Energy Future (eds Rajeshwar, K., McConnell, R. & Licht, S.) 41–63 (Springer, 2008).
  57. Coutanceau, C., Baranton, S. & Audichon, T. Hydrogen Electrochemical Production 17–62 (Academic Press, 2017). · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811250-2.00003-0
  58. Guillet, N. & Millet, P. in Hydrogen Production (ed. Godula‐Jopek, A.) 117–166 (Wiley, 2015). · DOI
  59. Miller, H. A. et al. Green hydrogen from anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: a review of recent developments in critical materials and operating conditions. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4, 2114–2133 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  60. Mongird, K. et al. Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report (US Department of Energy, 2019). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 749

Metadata

Authors
Lagadec, M. F., & Grimaud, A.
Venue
Nature Materials
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-10-05
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1140-1150
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
DOI
10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3
OpenAlex
W3090555410
Cited by
749
References
6
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE05-0008, ANR-10-LABX-0076)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3
The paper
Lagadec, M. F., & Grimaud, A. (2020). Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.