Cited by 309Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringConducting polymers and applicationsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Viscoelastic surface electrode arrays to interface with viscoelastic tissues

Open access
Tringides, Christina M., Vachicouras, Nicolas, de Lázaro, Irene, Wang, Hua, Trouillet, Alix, Seo, Bo Ri, Elosegui-Artola, Alberto, Fallegger, Florian +5 more·2021·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Living tissues are non-linearly elastic materials that exhibit viscoelasticity and plasticity. Man-made, implantable bioelectronic arrays mainly rely on rigid or elastic encapsulation materials and stiff films of ductile metals that can be manipulated with microscopic precision to offer reliable electrical properties. In this study, we have engineered a surface microelectrode array that replaces the traditional encapsulation and conductive components with viscoelastic materials. Our array overcomes previous limitations in matching the stiffness and relaxation behaviour of soft biological tissues by using hydrogels as the outer layers. We have introduced a hydrogel-based conductor made from an ionically conductive alginate matrix enhanced with carbon nanomaterials, which provide electrical percolation even at low loading fractions. Our combination of conducting and insulating viscoelastic materials, with top-down manufacturing, allows for the fabrication of electrode arrays compatible with standard electrophysiology platforms. Our arrays intimately conform to the convoluted surface of the heart or brain cortex and offer promising bioengineering applications for recording and stimulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-021-00926-z

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo ECG recording equipment on the surface of the heart is subjected to dynamic movement, unlike static neural implants.

    “Unlike static neural implants mentioned above, in vivo ECG recording equipment on the surface of the heart is subjected to dynamic movement.[375–378]”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [377]

    In “Assembly of a fully viscoelastic device and in vivo validation” (page not provided), the paper reports that an electrode array recorded ECG on a mouse heart and remained in place as the heart continued to beat. This supports the dynamic-movement point, but the paper does not characterize neural implants as static or establish the stated contrast. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Topsoe H Geometric factors in four point resistivity measurement. Bulletin No. 472–13. (1966).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tringides, C. M., Vachicouras, N., de Lázaro, I., Wang, H., Trouillet, A., Seo, B. R., Elosegui-Artola, A., Fallegger, F., Shin, Y., Casiraghi, C., Kostarelos, K., Lacour, S. P., & Mooney, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Mooney, David J.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2021-06-17
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1019-1029
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W3170991037
Cited by
309
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
23.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (183519)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P00119X/1, EP/N010345/1)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA214369)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE013033, R01DE013349)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD086843)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
bioelectronic interfaces, viscoelastic hydrogels, alginate hydrogel, carbon nanomaterials, ionic conductors, cardiac electrophysiology, electrical stimulation, top-down fabrication
MeSH terms
Electrodes, Microelectrodes, Surface Properties, Viscosity, Hydrogels, Nanostructures, Viscoelastic Substances, Bioengineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review