Cited by 283Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenomics and Rare Diseases

The heritability of human disease: estimation, uses and abuses.

Tenesa, Albert, Haley, Chris S.·2013·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Relatives provide the basic material for the study of inheritance of human disease. However, the methodologies for the estimation of heritability and the interpretation of the results have been controversial. The debate arises from the plethora of methods used, the validity of the methodological assumptions and the inconsistent and sometimes erroneous genetic interpretations made. We will discuss how to estimate disease heritability, how to interpret it, how biases in heritability estimates arise and how heritability relates to other measures of familial disease aggregation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3377

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study directly addresses the concern about lack of replication by replicating results across five countries and health systems.

    “In addition to providing exceptional statistical power, the study directly addresses the concern of lack of replication in research findings 31,32 replicating results across 5 countries and health systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tenesa, A., & Haley, C. S.
Affiliations
Roslin Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Tenesa, Albert
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2013-01-18
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
139-149
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2040924786
Cited by
283
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C12229/A13154, 13154)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/D/20211553, BB/K000195/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
heritability, human disease, heritability estimation, genetic and environmental contributions, phenotypic variance, familial aggregation, relatives
MeSH terms
Disease, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Pedigree, Models, Statistical, Bias, Linear Models, Twin Studies as Topic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review