Cited by 456Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 228 of the 228 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain circuit dysfunction in post-traumatic stress disorder: from mouse to man

Open access

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent, debilitating and sometimes deadly consequence of exposure to severe psychological trauma. Although effective treatments exist for some individuals, they are limited. New approaches to intervention, treatment and prevention are therefore much needed. In the past few years, the field has rapidly developed a greater understanding of the dysfunctional brain circuits underlying PTSD, a shift in understanding that has been made possible by technological revolutions that have allowed the observation and perturbation of the macrocircuits and microcircuits thought to underlie PTSD-related symptoms. These advances have allowed us to gain a more translational knowledge of PTSD, have provided further insights into the mechanisms of risk and resilience and offer promising avenues for therapeutic discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-018-0039-7

Cites

228 of 228 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 227 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shin, L. M. in Neurobiology of PTSD (eds Shiromani, P. J., Keane, T. M. & LeDoux, J. E.) (Humana Press, 2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fenster, R. J., Lebois, L. A. M., Ressler, K. J., & Suh, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ressler, Kerry J.
  • Suh, Junghyup
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2018-07-27
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
535-551
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2884319195
Cited by
456
References
227
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 4
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Biogen
  • Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA027450)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH112956, R01MH094757, F32MH109274, R01MH117292, R01MH108665)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, neural circuits, trauma, resilience, risk factors, translational research, neural circuit manipulation, PTSD treatment, PTSD prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review