Cited by 68Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Circuit dysregulation and circuit-based treatments in posttraumatic stress disorder

Open access
Sheynin, Jony, Liberzon, Israel·2017·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder that develops in some individuals in the aftermath of exposure to traumatic events, such as actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual assault. It has been hypothesized that dysregulations in a number of specific neurocircuits, characterized by heightened responsivity of amygdala, dACC and insula, diminished responsivity of mPFC, impaired hippocampal function and deficits in cortical regions, underlie the development and expression of key PTSD symptoms. Here, we concisely describe three functional neural circuits implicated in PTSD pathophysiology and briefly review selected treatment strategies in the context of these neural circuits. We start with the commonly implicated neurocircuit model, namely, the fear learning and threat detection circuits, and then discuss the context processing circuitry, which plays an important role among others, in fear regulation. We then discuss the emotion regulation circuitry, which can further contribute to PTSD pathophysiology, and conclude with a discussion of the therapeutic approaches that might be targeting dysregulation in these circuits in PTSD patients. Specifically, we discuss how exposure-based treatments might be targeting fear learning circuits, and the pharmacological and brain-stimulation interventions aimed to augment these therapies. Finally, we discuss other pharmacological and cognitive therapeutic approaches that can augment or restore the function of the context processing and emotional regulation circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.014

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A circuit involving the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus is concerned with the processing of context, enabling what has been learned about threat to be expressed or inhibited depending on the prevailing conditions.

    “Another circuit, involving the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus, is concerned with the processing of context, enabling what has been learned about threat to be expressed or inhibited depending on the prevailing conditions [34].”

    From Memory and Forgetting (2018) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [19]Patel R Spreng RN Shin LM Girard TA Neurocircuitry models of posttraumatic stress disorder and beyond: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36 2012 2130 2142 22766141
  2. [27]Kaczkurkin AN Burton PC Chazin SM Lissek SM Generalization of conditioned fear in individuals with PTSD Kaczkurkin A Lissek (chairs) S Psychophysiological and Neurobiological Indices of Internalizing Psychopathology Symposium Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Psychophysiological Research Florence, Italy 2013
  3. [59]Rabinak CA MacNamara A Kennedy AE Angstadt M Stein MB Liberzon I Phan KL Focal and aberrant prefrontal engagement during emotion regulation in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder Depress Anxiety 31 2014 851 861 24677490 PMC4141895
  4. [62]IOM (Institute of Medicine) Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: An assessment of the evidence Washington, DC The National Academies Press 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheynin, J., & Liberzon, I.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Liberzon, Israel
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
649
Pages
133-138
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550103662
Cited by
68
References
86
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Defense (W81XWH-13-1-0377)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH075999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, neural circuits, amygdala, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, fear learning, threat detection, context processing, emotion regulation, exposure therapy, pharmacotherapy, brain stimulation, cognitive therapy
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Emotions, Fear, Hippocampus, Humans, Neural Pathways, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review