Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurexins: molecular codes for shaping neuronal synapses

Gomez, Andrea M., Traunmüller, Lisa, Scheiffele, Peter·2021·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-020-00415-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 125

  1. Lu, W., Bushong, E. A., Shih, T. P., Ellisman, M. H. & Nicoll, R. A. The cell-autonomous role of excitatory synaptic transmission in the regulation of neuronal structure and function. Neuron 78, 433–439 (2013). · DOI
  2. Sigler, A. et al. Formation and maintenance of functional spines in the absence of presynaptic glutamate release. Neuron 94, 304–311.e4 (2017). · DOI
  3. Sando, R. et al. Assembly of excitatory synapses in the absence of glutamatergic neurotransmission. Neuron 94, 312–321.e3 (2017). · DOI
  4. Hobert, O. Terminal selectors of neuronal identity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 116, 455–475 (2016). · DOI
  5. Hassan, B. A. & Hiesinger, P. R. Beyond molecular codes: simple rules to wire complex brains. Cell 163, 285–291 (2015). · DOI
  6. Sudhof, T. C. Synaptic Neurexin complexes: a molecular code for the logic of neural circuits. Cell 171, 745–769 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sanes, J. R. & Zipursky, S. L. Synaptic specificity, recognition molecules, and assembly of neural circuits. Cell 181, 536–556 (2020). · DOI
  8. Stoeckli, E. T. Understanding axon guidance: are we nearly there yet? Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151415 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dalva, M. B. et al. EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell 103, 945–956 (2000). · DOI
  10. Graf, E. R., Zhang, X., Jin, S. X., Linhoff, M. W. & Craig, A. M. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell 119, 1013–1026 (2004). · DOI
  11. de Wit, J. et al. LRRTM2 interacts with Neurexin1 and regulates excitatory synapse formation. Neuron 64, 799–806 (2009). · DOI
  12. Ko, J., Fuccillo, M. V., Malenka, R. C. & Sudhof, T. C. LRRTM2 functions as a Neurexin ligand in promoting excitatory synapse formation. Neuron 64, 791–798 (2009). · DOI
  13. Pettem, K. L. et al. The specific α-Neurexin interactor calsyntenin-3 promotes excitatory and inhibitory synapse development. Neuron 80, 113–128 (2013). · DOI
  14. Siddiqui, T. J., Pancaroglu, R., Kang, Y., Rooyakkers, A. & Craig, A. M. LRRTMs and Neuroligins bind Neurexins with a differential code to cooperate in glutamate synapse development. J. Neurosci. 30, 7495–7506 (2010). · DOI
  15. de Wit, J. & Ghosh, A. Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 22–35 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kurshan, P. T. et al. γ-Neurexin and frizzled mediate parallel synapse assembly pathways antagonized by receptor endocytosis. Neuron 100, 150–166.e4 (2018). · DOI
  17. Maro, G. S. et al. MADD-4/punctin and Neurexin organize C. elegans GABAergic postsynapses through neuroligin. Neuron 86, 1420–1432 (2015). · DOI
  18. Philbrook, A. et al. Neurexin directs partner-specific synaptic connectivity in C. elegans. eLife 7, e35692 (2018). · DOI
  19. Banovic, D. et al. Drosophila Neuroligin 1 promotes growth and postsynaptic differentiation at glutamatergic neuromuscular junctions. Neuron 66, 724–738 (2010). · DOI
  20. Chen, Y. C. et al. Drosophila Neuroligin 2 is required presynaptically and postsynaptically for proper synaptic differentiation and synaptic transmission. J. Neurosci. 32, 16018–16030 (2012). · DOI
  21. Li, J., Ashley, J., Budnik, V. & Bhat, M. A. Crucial role of Drosophila Neurexin in proper active zone apposition to postsynaptic densities, synaptic growth, and synaptic transmission. Neuron 55, 741–755 (2007). · DOI
  22. Chen, S. X., Tari, P. K., She, K. & Haas, K. Neurexin–Neuroligin cell adhesion complexes contribute to synaptotropic dendritogenesis via growth stabilization mechanisms in vivo. Neuron 67, 967–983 (2010). · DOI
  23. Constance, W. D. et al. Neurexin and Neuroligin-based adhesion complexes drive axonal arborisation growth independent of synaptic activity. eLife 7, e31659 (2018). · DOI
  24. Burden, S. J., Huijbers, M. G. & Remedio, L. Fundamental molecules and mechanisms for forming and maintaining neuromuscular synapses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 490 (2018). · DOI
  25. Chen, L. Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, B., Gokce, O. & Sudhof, T. C. Conditional deletion of all Neurexins defines diversity of essential synaptic organizer functions for Neurexins. Neuron 94, 611–625 e614 (2017). This study highlights cell type-specific alterations in synapse formation and synaptic function resulting from genetic Neurexin deletion. · DOI
  26. Li, Y. et al. Splicing-dependent trans-synaptic SALM3–LAR–RPTP interactions regulate excitatory synapse development and locomotion. Cell Rep. 12, 1618–1630 (2015). · DOI
  27. Haklai-Topper, L. et al. The Neurexin superfamily of Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene Expr. Patterns 11, 144–150 (2011). · DOI
  28. Knight, D., Xie, W. & Boulianne, G. L. Neurexins and Neuroligins: recent insights from invertebrates. Mol. Neurobiol. 44, 426–440 (2011). · DOI
  29. Yan, Q. et al. Systematic discovery of regulated and conserved alternative exons in the mammalian brain reveals NMD modulating chromatin regulators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1502849112 (2015). · DOI
  30. Nguyen, T. M. et al. An alternative splicing switch shapes Neurexin repertoires in principal neurons versus interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. eLife 5, e22757 (2016). · DOI
  31. Ullrich, B., Ushkaryov, Y. A. & Sudhof, T. C. Cartography of Neurexins: more than 1000 isoforms generated by alternative splicing and expressed in distinct subsets of neurons. Neuron 14, 497–507 (1995). · DOI
  32. Furlanis, E., Traunmuller, L., Fucile, G. & Scheiffele, P. Landscape of ribosome-engaged transcript isoforms reveals extensive neuronal-cell-class-specific alternative splicing programs. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1709–1717 (2019). · DOI
  33. Schreiner, D. et al. Targeted combinatorial alternative splicing generates brain region-specific repertoires of Neurexins. Neuron 84, 386–398 (2014). · DOI
  34. Flaherty, E. et al. Neuronal impact of patient-specific aberrant NRXN1α splicing. Nat. Genet. 51, 1679–1690 (2019). Together with Schreiner et al. (2014) and Treutlein et al. (2014), this study reports numbers and cell type-selectivity of Neurexin splice isoforms in rodent and human neurons by long-read mRNA sequencing. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ding, X. et al. Translational inhibition of α-Neurexin 2. Sci. Rep. 10, 3403 (2020). · DOI
  36. Schreiner, D., Simicevic, J., Ahrné, E., Schmidt, A. & Scheiffele, P. Quantitative isoform-profiling of highly diversified recognition molecules. eLife 4, 1–17 (2015). · DOI
  37. Ushkaryov, Y. A., Petrenko, A. G., Geppert, M. & Sudhof, T. C. Neurexins: synaptic cell surface proteins related to the α-latrotoxin receptor and laminin. Science 257, 50–56 (1992). · DOI
  38. Comoletti, D. et al. The macromolecular architecture of extracellular domain of αNRXN1: domain organization, flexibility, and insights into trans-synaptic disposition. Structure 18, 1044–1053 (2010). · DOI
  39. Biederer, T. & Sudhof, T. C. CASK and protein 4.1 support F-actin nucleation on Neurexins. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47869–47876 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Miller, M. T. et al. The crystal structure of the α-Neurexin-1 extracellular region reveals a hinge point for mediating synaptic adhesion and function. Structure 19, 767–778 (2011). · DOI
  41. Sheckler, L. R., Henry, L., Sugita, S., Sudhof, T. C. & Rudenko, G. Crystal structure of the second LNS/LG domain from Neurexin 1α: Ca2+ binding and the effects of alternative splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 22896–22905 (2006). · DOI
  42. Wilson, S. C. et al. Structures of Neurexophilin–Neurexin complexes reveal a regulatory mechanism of alternative splicing. EMBO J. 38, e101603 (2019). · DOI
  43. Rudenko, G., Hohenester, E. & Muller, Y. A. LG/LNS domains: multiple functions — one business end? Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 363–368 (2001). · DOI
  44. Arac, D. et al. Structures of Neuroligin-1 and the Neuroligin-1/Neurexin-1β complex reveal specific protein–protein and protein–Ca2+ interactions. Neuron 56, 992–1003 (2007). · DOI
  45. Chen, X., Liu, H., Shim, A. H., Focia, P. J. & He, X. Structural basis for synaptic adhesion mediated by Neuroligin–Neurexin interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 50–56 (2008). · DOI
  46. Fabrichny, I. P. et al. Structural analysis of the synaptic protein Neuroligin and its β-Neurexin complex: determinants for folding and cell adhesion. Neuron 56, 979–991 (2007). · DOI
  47. Koehnke, J. et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular cholinesterase-like domain from Neuroligin-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1873–1878 (2008). · DOI
  48. Koehnke, J. et al. Crystal structures of β-Neurexin 1 and β-Neurexin 2 ectodomains and dynamics of splice insertion sequence 4. Structure 16, 410–421 (2008). · DOI
  49. Boucard, A. A., Chubykin, A. A., Comoletti, D., Taylor, P. & Sudhof, T. C. A splice code for trans-synaptic cell adhesion mediated by binding of Neuroligin 1 to α- and β-Neurexins. Neuron 48, 229–236 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Koehnke, J. et al. Splice form dependence of β-Neurexin/Neuroligin binding interactions. Neuron 67, 61–74 (2010). · DOI
  51. Uemura, T. et al. Trans-synaptic interaction of GluRδa2 and Neurexin through Cbln1 mediates synapse formation in the cerebellum. Cell 141, 1068–1079 (2010). This study discovers a tripartite synaptic complex consisting of Neurexins, Cerebellins and the postsynaptic receptor GLUD2. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Zhang, P. et al. Heparan sulfate organizes neuronal synapses through Neurexin partnerships. Cell 174, 1450–1464.e23 (2018). This work reveals a major contribution of Neurexin carbohydrate modifications to the assembly of synaptic protein complexes. · DOI
  53. Roppongi, R. T. et al. LRRTMs organize synapses through differential engagement of Neurexin and PTPσ. Neuron 106, 108–125.e12 (2020). · DOI
  54. Bulow, H. E. & Hobert, O. The molecular diversity of glycosaminoglycans shapes animal development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 375–407 (2006). · DOI
  55. Sugita, S. et al. A stoichiometric complex of Neurexins and dystroglycan in brain. J. Cell Biol. 154, 435–445 (2001). · DOI
  56. Chen, F., Venugopal, V., Murray, B. & Rudenko, G. The structure of Neurexin 1α reveals features promoting a role as synaptic organizer. Structure 19, 779–789 (2011). Together with Miller et al. (2011), this study uncovers the structural organization of the α-Neurexin extracellular domain. · DOI
  57. Tanaka, H. et al. Higher-order architecture of cell adhesion mediated by polymorphic synaptic adhesion molecules Neurexin and Neuroligin. Cell Rep. 2, 101–110 (2012). · DOI
  58. Fuccillo, M. V. et al. Single-cell mRNA profiling reveals cell-type-specific expression of Neurexin isoforms. Neuron 87, 326–340 (2015). · DOI
  59. Lukacsovich, D. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals developmental origins and ontogenetic stability of Neurexin alternative splicing profiles. Cell Rep. 27, 3752–3759.e4 (2019). · DOI
  60. Winterer, J. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq characterization of anatomically identified OLM interneurons in different transgenic mouse lines. Eur. J. Neurosci. 50, 3750–3771 (2019). · DOI
  61. Chen, M. & Manley, J. L. Mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation: insights from molecular and genomics approaches. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 741–754 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Neugebauer, K. M. Nascent RNA and the coordination of splicing with transcription. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a032227 (2019). · DOI
  63. Raj, B. & Blencowe, B. J. Alternative splicing in the mammalian nervous system: recent insights into mechanisms and functional roles. Neuron 87, 14–27 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Darnell, R. B. RNA protein interaction in neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 243–270 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  65. Resnick, M., Segall, A., G, G. R., Lupowitz, Z. & Zisapel, N. Alternative splicing of Neurexins: a role for neuronal polypyrimidine tract binding protein. Neurosci. Lett. 439, 235–240 (2008). · DOI
  66. Gehman, L. T. et al. The splicing regulator Rbfox2 is required for both cerebellar development and mature motor function. Genes Dev. 26, 445–460 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Saito, Y. et al. Differential NOVA2-mediated splicing in excitatory and inhibitory neurons regulates cortical development and cerebellar function. Neuron 101, 707–720.e5 (2019). · DOI
  68. Wamsley, B. et al. Rbfox1 mediates cell-type-specific splicing in cortical interneurons. Neuron 100, 846–859 (2018). · DOI
  69. Di Fruscio, M., Chen, T. & Richard, S. Characterization of Sam68-like mammalian proteins SLM-1 and SLM-2: SLM-1 is a Src substrate during mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2710–2715 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  70. Feracci, M. et al. Structural basis of RNA recognition and dimerization by the STAR proteins T-STAR and Sam68. Nat. Commun. 7, 10355 (2016). · DOI
  71. Danilenko, M. et al. Binding site density enables paralog-specific activity of SLM2 and Sam68 proteins in Neurexin2 AS4 splicing control. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 4120–4130 (2017).
  72. Elegheert, J. et al. Structural basis for integration of GluD receptors within synaptic organizer complexes. Science 353, 295–299 (2016). · DOI
  73. Matsuda, K. & Yuzaki, M. Cbln family proteins promote synapse formation by regulating distinct Neurexin signaling pathways in various brain regions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 33, 1447–1461 (2011). · DOI
  74. Ito-Ishida, A. et al. Cbln1 regulates rapid formation and maintenance of excitatory synapses in mature cerebellar Purkinje cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. 28, 5920–5930 (2008). · DOI
  75. Matsuda, K. et al. Cbln1 is a ligand for an orphan glutamate receptor δ2, a bidirectional synapse organizer. Science 328, 363–368 (2010). · DOI
  76. Stoss, O. et al. p59fyn-mediated phosphorylation regulates the activity of the tissue-specific splicing factor rSLM-1. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 27, 8–21 (2004). · DOI
  77. Traunmüller, L., Bornmann, C. & Scheiffele, P. Alternative splicing coupled nonsense-mediated decay generates neuronal cell type-specific expression of SLM proteins. J. Neurosci. 34, 16755–16761 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  78. Traunmüller, L., Gomez, A. M., Nguyen, T.-M. & Scheiffele, P. Control of neuronal synapse specification by highly dedicated alternative splicing program. Science 352, 982–986 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  79. Aoto, J., Martinelli, D. C., Malenka, R. C., Tabuchi, K. & Südhof, T. C. Presynaptic Neurexin-3 alternative splicing trans-synaptically controls postsynaptic AMPA receptor trafficking. Cell 154, 75–88 (2013). Together with Traunmüller et al. (2016), this study demonstrates a major impact of Neurexin alternative splicing on glutamatergic synapse function. · DOI
  80. Shipman, S. L. & Nicoll, R. A. A subtype-specific function for the extracellular domain of Neuroligin 1 in hippocampal LTP. Neuron 76, 309–316 (2012). · DOI
  81. Soler-Llavina, G. J. et al. Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins are essential for maintenance of long-term potentiation. Neuron 79, 439–446 (2013). · DOI
  82. Dai, J., Aoto, J. & Sudhof, T. C. Alternative splicing of presynaptic Neurexins differentially controls postsynaptic NMDA and AMPA receptor responses. Neuron 102, 993–1008.e5 (2019). · DOI
  83. Xie, J. & Black, D. L. A CaMK IV responsive RNA element mediates depolarization-induced alternative splicing of ion channels. Nature 410, 936–939 (2001). · DOI
  84. Rozic-Kotliroff, G. & Zisapel, N. Ca2+-dependent splicing of Neurexin IIα. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 352, 226–230 (2007). · DOI
  85. Ding, X. et al. Activity-induced histone modifications govern Neurexin-1 mRNA splicing and memory preservation. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 690–699 (2017). · DOI
  86. Saura, C. A., Servian-Morilla, E. & Scholl, F. G. Presenilin/γ-secretase regulates Neurexin processing at synapses. PLoS ONE 6, e19430 (2011). · DOI
  87. Servian-Morilla, E. et al. Proteolytic processing of Neurexins by presenilins sustains synaptic vesicle release. J. Neurosci. 38, 901–917 (2018). · DOI
  88. Kornblihtt, A. R. Transcriptional control of alternative splicing along time: ideas change, experiments remain. RNA 21, 670–672 (2015). · DOI
  89. Furlanis, E. & Scheiffele, P. Regulation of neuronal differentiation, function, and plasticity by alternative splicing. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 451–469 (2018). · DOI
  90. Tanabe, Y. et al. IgSF21 promotes differentiation of inhibitory synapses via binding to Neurexin2α. Nat. Commun. 8, 408 (2017). · DOI
  91. Hu, Z., Xiao, X., Zhang, Z. & Li, M. Genetic insights and neurobiological implications from NRXN1 in neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 1400–1414 (2019). · DOI
  92. Cosemans, N. et al. The clinical relevance of intragenic NRXN1 deletions. J. Med. Genet. 57, 347–355 (2020). · DOI
  93. Rujescu, D. et al. Disruption of the Neurexin 1 gene is associated with schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 988–996 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  94. Vaags, A. K. et al. Rare deletions at the Neurexin 3 locus in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 133–141 (2012). · DOI
  95. Huang, A. Y. et al. Rare copy number variants in NRXN1 and CNTN6 increase risk for Tourette syndrome. Neuron 94, 1101–1111.e7 (2017). · DOI
  96. Nussbaum, J. et al. Significant association of the Neurexin-1 gene (NRXN1) with nicotine dependence in European- and African-American smokers. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 1569–1577 (2008). · DOI
  97. Rochtus, A. M. et al. Mutations in NRXN1 and NRXN2 in a patient with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy and respiratory depression. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 5, a003442 (2019). · DOI
  98. Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444–454 (2006). · DOI
  99. Vinas-Jornet, M. et al. A common cognitive, psychiatric, and dysmorphic phenotype in carriers of NRXN1 deletion. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2, 512–521 (2014). · DOI
  100. Harrison, V. et al. Compound heterozygous deletion of NRXN1 causing severe developmental delay with early onset epilepsy in two sisters. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 155A, 2826–2831 (2011). · DOI
  101. Zweier, C. et al. CNTNAP2 and NRXN1 are mutated in autosomal-recessive Pitt–Hopkins-like mental retardation and determine the level of a common synaptic protein in Drosophila. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 655–666 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  102. Tong, X. J., Hu, Z., Liu, Y., Anderson, D. & Kaplan, J. M. A network of autism linked genes stabilizes two pools of synaptic GABAA receptors. eLife 4, e09648 (2015). · DOI
  103. Laarakker, M. C., Reinders, N. R., Bruining, H., Ophoff, R. A. & Kas, M. J. Sex-dependent novelty response in Neurexin-1α mutant mice. PLoS ONE 7, e31503 (2012). · DOI
  104. Born, G. et al. Genetic targeting of NRXN2 in mice unveils role in excitatory cortical synapse function and social behaviors. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 7, 3 (2015). · DOI
  105. Rabaneda, L. G., Robles-Lanuza, E., Nieto-Gonzalez, J. L. & Scholl, F. G. Neurexin dysfunction in adult neurons results in autistic-like behavior in mice. Cell Rep. 8, 338–346 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  106. Greenberg, D. M., Warrier, V., Allison, C. & Baron-Cohen, S. Testing the empathizing–systemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12152–12157 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  107. Keum, S. et al. A missense variant at the Nrxn3 locus enhances empathy fear in the mouse. Neuron 98, 588–601 e585 (2018). This study reports the critical contribution of a Nrxn3 sequence variant in mice to cortical circuit function and emotional behaviour. · DOI
  108. Panksepp, J. & Panksepp, J. B. Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy. Trends Neurosci. 36, 489–496 (2013). · DOI
  109. Cao, Y. et al. Mechanism for selective synaptic wiring of rod photoreceptors into the retinal circuitry and its role in vision. Neuron 87, 1248–1260 (2015). · DOI
  110. Park, H. et al. Splice-dependent trans-synaptic PTPδ–IL1RAPL1 interaction regulates synapse formation and non-REM sleep. EMBO J. 39, e104150 (2020). This work uncovers a key role for an alternative exon in the regulation of trans-synaptic interactions, synaptic transmission and mouse behaviour. · DOI
  111. Kim, K. et al. Presynaptic PTPσ regulates postsynaptic NMDA receptor function through direct adhesion-independent mechanisms. eLife 9, e54224 (2020). · DOI
  112. Shen, K. & Scheiffele, P. Genetics and cell biology of building specific synaptic connectivity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 473–507 (2010). · DOI
  113. Kim, B. & Emmons, S. W. Multiple conserved cell adhesion protein interactions mediate neural wiring of a sensory circuit in C. elegans. eLife 6, e29257 (2017). · DOI
  114. Schroeder, A. et al. A modular organization of LRR protein-mediated synaptic adhesion defines synapse identity. Neuron 99, 329–344.e7 (2018). · DOI
  115. Yamagata, A. et al. Structural insights into modulation and selectivity of transsynaptic Neurexin–LRRTM interaction. Nat. Commun. 9, 3964 (2018). · DOI
  116. Ibata, K. et al. Activity-dependent secretion of synaptic organizer Cbln1 from lysosomes in granule cell axons. Neuron 102, 1184–1198.10 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  117. Ito-Ishida, A. et al. Presynaptically released Cbln1 induces dynamic axonal structural changes by interacting with GluD2 during cerebellar synapse formation. Dev. Cell 23, 923–924 (2012). Together with Matsuda et al. (2010), this study demonstrates critical in vivo functions of the Neurexin–Cerebellin–GLUD2 complex in cerebellar synapse formation and maintenance. · DOI
  118. Brockhaus, J. et al. α-Neurexins together with α2δ-1 auxiliary subunits regulate Ca2+ influx through Cav2.1 channels. J. Neurosci. 38, 8277–8294 (2018). · DOI
  119. Tong, X. J. et al. Retrograde synaptic inhibition is mediated by α-Neurexin binding to the α2δ subunits of N-type calcium channels. Neuron 95, 326–340.e5 (2017). · DOI
  120. Uchigashima, M., Cheung, A., Suh, J., Watanabe, M. & Futai, K. Differential expression of Neurexin genes in the mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 527, 1940–1965 (2019). · DOI
  121. Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Targeting neuronal activity-regulated neuroligin-3 dependency in high-grade glioma. Nature 549, 533–537 (2017). · DOI
  122. Venkataramani, V. et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 573, 532–538 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  123. Zeng, Q. et al. Synaptic proximity enables NMDAR signalling to promote brain metastasis. Nature 573, 526–531 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  124. Singh, S. K. et al. Astrocytes assemble thalamocortical synapses by bridging NRX1α and NL1 via Hevin. Cell 164, 183–196 (2016). · DOI
  125. Xu, J., Xiao, N. & Xia, J. Thrombospondin 1 accelerates synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons through neuroligin 1. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 22–24 (2009). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gomez, A. M., Traunmüller, L., & Scheiffele, P.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2021-01-08
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
137-151
ISSN
  • 1471-003X
  • 1471-0048
Cited by
243
References
26
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.