Cited by 148Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 271 of the 271 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Basal forebrain cholinergic signalling: development, connectivity and roles in cognition

Open access

Abstract

Acetylcholine plays an essential role in fundamental aspects of cognition. Studies that have mapped the activity and functional connectivity of cholinergic neurons have shown that the axons of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons innervate the pallium with far more topographical and functional organization than was historically appreciated. Together with the results of studies using new probes that allow release of acetylcholine to be detected with high spatial and temporal resolution, these findings have implicated cholinergic networks in 'binding' diverse behaviours that contribute to cognition. Here, we review recent findings on the developmental origins, connectivity and function of cholinergic neurons, and explore the participation of cholinergic signalling in the encoding of cognition-related behaviours.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-023-00677-x

Cites

271 of 271 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 268 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Metadata

Authors
Ananth, M. R., Rajebhosale, P., Kim, R., Talmage, D. A., & Role, L. W.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ananth, Mala R.
  • Role, Lorna W.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2023-02-23
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
233-251
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W4321610346
Cited by
148
References
268
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 5
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1zians009424-02, ZIA NS009424)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, acetylcholine, cholinergic neurotransmission, cognitive behavior
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Cognition, Humans, Signal Transduction, Cholinergic Agents, Basal Forebrain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review