Cited by 111CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringDNA Repair MechanismsReproductive Biology and Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Inter-homologue repair in fertilized human eggs?

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0379-5

Cites

20 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Suzuki, T., Asami, M. & Perry, A. C. Asymmetric parental genome engineering by Cas9 during mouse meiotic exit. Sci. Rep. 4, 7621 (2014). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Egli, D., Zuccaro, M. V., Kosicki, M., Church, G. M., Bradley, A., & Jasin, M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Egli, Dieter
  • Jasin, Maria
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-08
Volume
560
Issue
7717
Pages
E5-E7
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2952775612
Cited by
111
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Temple University
  • Consorzio Interuniversitario Biotecnologie
  • Moxie Foundation
  • La Trobe University
  • University of Adelaide
  • Government of Jiangxi Province
  • Universitas Diponegoro
  • Institute for Basic Science (IBSR021-D1, R021-D1)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
human embryo, CRISPR/Cas9, DNA double-strand break repair, metaphase II oocytes, germline gene therapy, zygote, homologous recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review