Cited by 171Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPacific and Southeast Asian Studies

Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores

van den Bergh, Gerrit D., Kaifu, Yousuke, Kurniawan, Iwan, Kono, Reiko T., Brumm, Adam, Setiyabudi, Erick, Aziz, Fachroel, Morwood, Michael J.·2016·Nature

Abstract

The evolutionary origin of Homo floresiensis, a diminutive hominin species previously known only by skeletal remains from Liang Bua in western Flores, Indonesia, has been intensively debated. It is a matter of controversy whether this primitive form, dated to the Late Pleistocene, evolved from early Asian Homo erectus and represents a unique and striking case of evolutionary reversal in hominin body and brain size within an insular environment. The alternative hypothesis is that H. floresiensis derived from an older, smaller-brained member of our genus, such as Homo habilis, or perhaps even late Australopithecus, signalling a hitherto undocumented dispersal of hominins from Africa into eastern Asia by two million years ago (2 Ma). Here we describe hominin fossils excavated in 2014 from an early Middle Pleistocene site (Mata Menge) in the So'a Basin of central Flores. These specimens comprise a mandible fragment and six isolated teeth belonging to at least three small-jawed and small-toothed individuals. Dating to ~0.7 Ma, these fossils now constitute the oldest hominin remains from Flores. The Mata Menge mandible and teeth are similar in dimensions and morphological characteristics to those of H. floresiensis from Liang Bua. The exception is the mandibular first molar, which retains a more primitive condition. Notably, the Mata Menge mandible and molar are even smaller in size than those of the two existing H. floresiensis individuals from Liang Bua. The Mata Menge fossils are derived compared with Australopithecus and H. habilis, and so tend to support the view that H. floresiensis is a dwarfed descendent of early Asian H. erectus. Our findings suggest that hominins on Flores had acquired extremely small body size and other morphological traits specific to H. floresiensis at an unexpectedly early time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature17999

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The debate about Homo floresiensis has now been decidedly settled in favor of H. floresiensis as a distinct hominin species.

    “This debate has now been decidedly settled in favor of H. floresiensis as a distinct hominin species (Van den Bergh et al., 2016).”

    From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Van den Bergh et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Bergh, G. D., Kaifu, Y., Kurniawan, I., Kono, R. T., Brumm, A., Setiyabudi, E., Aziz, F., & Morwood, M. J.
Affiliations
  • National Museum of Nature and Science (JP)
  • Badan Geologi (ID)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Kaifu, Yousuke
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
534
Issue
7606
Pages
245-248
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2414509092
Cited by
171
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
111.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24247044)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Keywords
Homo floresiensis, Flores, Middle Pleistocene, hominin evolution, Homo erectus, evolutionary reversal, mandible, isolated teeth, Liang Bua, lithic artifacts, hominin diet, hominin cognition, hominin dispersal
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Indonesia, Mandible, Organ Size, Tooth, Hominidae, Body Size, Radiometric Dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review