CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Holocene crop cultivation and landscape modification in Amazonia

Lombardo, Umberto, Iriarte, José, Hilbert, Lautaro, Ruiz-Pérez, Javier, Capriles, José M., Veit, Heinz·2020·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2162-7PMC PMC7250647
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2162-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Larson, G. et al. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6139–6146 (2014). · DOI
  2. Zohary, D. & Hopf, M. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: the Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
  3. Zeder, M. A., Bradley, D. G., Smith, B. D. & Emshwiller, E. Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms (Univ. California Press, 2006). · DOI
  4. Piperno, D. R. The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics: patterns, process, and new developments. Curr. Anthropol. 52, S453–S470 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clement, C. R., de Cristo-Araújo, M., d’Eeckenbrugge, G. C., Alves Pereira, A. & Picanço-Rodrigues, D. Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity (Basel) 2, 72–106 (2010). · DOI
  6. Olsen, K. & Schaal, B. Microsatellite variation in cassava (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) and its wild relatives: further evidence for a southern Amazonian origin of domestication. Am. J. Bot. 88, 131–142 (2001). · DOI
  7. Sanjur, O. I., Piperno, D. R., Andres, T. C. & Wessel-Beaver, L. Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 535–540 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Clement, C. R. et al. The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 282, 20150813 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Scaldaferro, M. A., Barboza, G. E. & Acosta, M. C. Evolutionary history of the chili pepper Capsicum baccatum L. (Solanaceae): domestication in South America and natural diversification in the seasonally dry tropical forests. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 124, 466–478 (2018). · DOI
  10. Watling, J. et al. Direct archaeological evidence for Southwestern Amazonia as an early plant domestication and food production centre. PLoS ONE 13, e0199868 (2018). · DOI
  11. Lombardo, U. et al. Early and middle Holocene hunter-gatherer occupations in western Amazonia: the hidden shell middens. PLoS ONE 8, e72746 (2013). · DOI
  12. Capriles, J. M. et al. Persistent Early to Middle Holocene tropical foraging in southwestern Amazonia. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav5449 (2019). · DOI
  13. Hilbert, L. et al. Evidence for mid-Holocene rice domestication in the Americas. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1693–1698 (2017). · DOI
  14. Lombardo, U. et al. Holocene land cover change in south-western Amazonia inferred from paleoflood archives. Global Planet. Change 174, 105–114 (2019). · DOI
  15. Chandler-Ezell, K., Pearsall, D. M. & Zeidler, J. A. Root and tuber phytoliths and starch grains document manioc (Manihot esculenta) arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) and llerén (Calathea sp.) at the Real Alto site, Ecuador. Econ. Bot. 60, 103–120 (2006). · DOI
  16. Piperno, D. R. Phytoliths (AltaMira Press, 2006).
  17. Morcote-Ríos, G., Bernal, R. & Raz, L. Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 182, 348–360 (2016). · DOI
  18. Hanelt, P., Buttner, R. & Mansfeld, R. Mansfeld’s Encyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (except Ornamentals) (Springer, 2001). · DOI
  19. Piperno, D. R. & Stothert, K. E. Phytolith evidence for early Holocene Cucurbita domestication in southwest Ecuador. Science 299, 1054–1057 (2003). · DOI
  20. Dillehay, T. D. & Piperno, D. R. in The Cambridge World Prehistory (eds Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P.) 970–985 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  21. Kistler, L. et al. Multiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science 362, 1309–1313 (2018). · DOI
  22. Rival, L. & McKey, D. Domestication and diversity in manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz ssp. esculenta, Euphorbiaceae). Curr. Anthropol. 49, 1119–1128 (2008). · DOI
  23. Rodrigues, L., Lombardo, U. & Veit, H. Design of pre-Columbian raised fields in the Llanos de Moxos, Bolivian Amazon: differential adaptations to the local environment? J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 17, 366–378 (2018).
  24. McKey, D., Cavagnaro, T. R., Cliff, J. & Gleadow, R. J. C. Chemical ecology in coupled human and natural systems: people, manioc, multitrophic interactions and global change. Chemoecology 20, 109–133 (2010). · DOI
  25. Jones, M. in The Evolution of Hominin Diets (eds Hublin, J.-J. & Richards, M. P.) 171–180 (Springer, 2009). · DOI
  26. Aceituno, F. J. & Loaiza, N. The origins and early development of plant food production and farming in Colombian tropical forests. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 49, 161–172 (2018). · DOI
  27. Smith, B. D. General patterns of niche construction and the management of ‘wild’ plant and animal resources by small-scale pre-industrial societies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 836–848 (2011). · DOI
  28. Lombardo, U., May, J.-H. & Veit, H. Mid- to late-Holocene fluvial activity behind pre-Columbian social complexity in the southwestern Amazon basin. Holocene 22, 1035–1045 (2012). · DOI
  29. Manning, A. D., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Scattered trees are keystone structures – implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 132, 311–321 (2006). · DOI
  30. Tews, J. et al. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31, 79–92 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Berkunsky, I. et al. Assessing the use of forest islands by parrot species in a Neotropical savanna. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 10, 11 (2015).
  32. Prümers, H. & Jaimes Betancourt, C. 100 años de investigación arqueológica en los Llanos de Mojos. Arqueoantropológicas 4, 11–53 (2014).
  33. Junqueira, A. B., Shepard, G. H. & Clement, C. R. J. E. B. Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils of the middle Madeira river: valuation, local knowledge, and landscape domestication in Brazilian Amazonia. Econ. Bot. 65, 85–99 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lombardo, U., Canal-Beeby, E. & Veit, H. Eco-archaeological regions in the Bolivian Amazon: linking pre-Columbian earthworks and environmental diversity. Geogr. Helv. 66, 173–182 (2011). · DOI
  35. Langstroth Plotkin, R. Biogeography of the Llanos de Moxos: natural and anthropogenic determinants. Geogr. Helv. 66, 183–192 (2011). · DOI
  36. Lombardo, U., Denier, S. & Veit, H. Soil properties and pre-Columbian settlement patterns in the monumental mounds region of the Llanos de Moxos, Bolivian Amazon. Soil (Gottingen) 1, 65–81 (2015). · DOI
  37. Rodrigues, L., Lombardo, U., Canal Beeby, E. & Veit, H. Linking soil properties and pre-Columbian agricultural strategies in the Bolivian lowlands: the case of raised fields in Exaltación. Quat. Int. 437, 143–155 (2017). · DOI
  38. Boixadera, J., Poch, R. M., García-González, M. T. & Vizcayno, C. Hydromorphic and clay-related processes in soils from the Llanos de Moxos (northern Bolivia). Catena 54, 403–424 (2003). · DOI
  39. Lombardo, U., Ruiz-Pérez, J. & Madella, M. Sonication improves the efficiency, efficacy and safety of phytolith extraction. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 235, 1–5 (2016). · DOI
  40. Piperno, D. R. Identifying crop plants with phytoliths (and starch grains) in Central and South America: a review and an update of the evidence. Quat. Int. 193, 146–159 (2009). · DOI
  41. Iriarte, J. Assessing the feasibility of identifying maize through the analysis of cross-shaped size and three-dimensional morphology of phytoliths in the grasslands of southeastern South America. J. Archaeol. Sci. 30, 1085–1094 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Watling, J. et al. Differentiation of Neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions II: southwestern Amazonian forests. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 226, 30–43 (2016). · DOI
  43. Dickau, R. et al. Differentiation of Neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 193, 15–37 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Hogg, A. G. et al. SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1889–1903 (2013). · DOI
  45. Bronk Ramsey, C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337–360 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Piperno, D. R. et al. Phytoliths in Cucurbita and other Neotropical Cucurbitaceae and their occurrence in early Archaeological sites from the lowland American tropics. J. Arch. Sci. 27, 193–208 (2000). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lombardo, U., Iriarte, J., Hilbert, L., Ruiz-Pérez, J., Capriles, J. M., & Veit, H.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
581
Issue
7807
Pages
190-193
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-020-2162-7
PMC
PMC7250647
Cited by
200
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review