Cited by 433Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 23 of the 38 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The CDK inhibitor CR8 acts as a molecular glue degrader that depletes cyclin K

Open access

Abstract

Molecular glue compounds induce protein-protein interactions that, in the context of a ubiquitin ligase, lead to protein degradation 1. Unlike traditional enzyme inhibitors, these molecular glue degraders act substoichiometrically to catalyse the rapid depletion of previously inaccessible targets 2. They are clinically effective and highly sought-after, but have thus far only been discovered serendipitously. Here, through systematically mining databases for correlations between the cytotoxicity of 4,518 clinical and preclinical small molecules and the expression levels of E3 ligase components across hundreds of human cancer cell lines 3-5, we identify CR8-a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor 6-as a compound that acts as a molecular glue degrader. The CDK-bound form of CR8 has a solvent-exposed pyridyl moiety that induces the formation of a complex between CDK12-cyclin K and the CUL4 adaptor protein DDB1, bypassing the requirement for a substrate receptor and presenting cyclin K for ubiquitination and degradation. Our studies demonstrate that chemical alteration of surface-exposed moieties can confer gain-of-function glue properties to an inhibitor, and we propose this as a broader strategy through which target-binding molecules could be converted into molecular glues.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Systematic mining of drug-sensitivity and E3-ligase expression data across cancer cell lines identified CR8 as a molecular glue degrader. CR8-bound CDK12 recruits DDB1 to ubiquitinate and deplete cyclin K, with a surface-exposed pyridyl group conferring the glue activity.

Key findings

  • A correlation screen of 4,518 clinical/preclinical compounds across 578 cancer cell lines and 499 E3 ligase components linked R-CR8 toxicity to DDB1 expression; DDB1-targeting sgRNAs conferred resistance. Proteome-wide mass spectrometry of >8,000 proteins found cyclin K as the only consistently decreased protein after R-CR8, and degradation was rescued by MLN7243, MLN4924, and MG132.
  • CRISPR screens implicated DDB1, CUL4B, RBX1, NEDD8, and NAE1/UBA3, but no canonical DCAF substrate receptor. In vitro, CR8 induced CDK12-cycK binding to DDB1 with an affinity range of 100–500 nM and strengthened the complex 500- to 1000-fold by ITC; the CUL4A-RBX1-DDB1 core alone supported cyclin K ubiquitination.
  • A 3.5 Å crystal structure showed CR8 bridging CDK12 and DDB1, with CDK12 acting as a drug-induced substrate receptor. CDK13 was recruited less efficiently than CDK12, while CDK9 was not; the 2-pyridyl/phenylpyridine moiety was required, as roscovitine and DRF053 bound more weakly and failed to degrade the reporter, and flavopiridol supported in vitro ubiquitination but not cellular degradation.
  • DDB1 depletion reduced CR8 cytotoxicity about ten-fold but did not affect other CDK inhibitors; CRBN overexpression decreased cyclin K degradation and altered CR8 sensitivity.

Methods

  • Bioinformatic mining of PRISM viability data for 4,518 compounds across 578 cell lines, correlated with CCLE expression and copy-number data for 499 E3 ligase components, followed by CRISPR-based validation of drug–E3 pairs.
  • Cellular work used HEK293T and other Cas9-expressing lines, a cycKeGFP/mCherry stability reporter, genome-wide and E3-focused CRISPR screens, DCAF arrayed screens, quantitative proteomics, qPCR, immunoblots, and drug-sensitivity assays.
  • Biochemical and structural work used recombinant CDK12-cycK and DDB1 proteins, co-immunoprecipitation, in vitro ubiquitination, TR-FRET, ITC, BRET, and crystallization with structure determination at 3.5 Å.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a dedicated limitations section. Evident from the text: no canonical DCAF was identified despite multiple screens, and CDK12 autoubiquitination is proposed but not demonstrated.
  • Evident: structural density for the CDK12 C-terminal region was only tentatively assigned because of multiple conformations, and cellular degradation did not always track with in vitro ubiquitination results.
  • Evident: the genome-wide CR8 resistance screen used one DMSO and one CR8 condition, and the proteomics experiment had a single CR8 replicate, limiting statistical robustness.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2374-x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

38 Own result · 20 Own interpretation · 8 Supported · 7 No full text of the sources · 5 Partly supported · 3 Supported so far · 3 Own method · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 36 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 38
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Molecular glue degraders have so far been found only by chance, and few strategies exist for finding or designing them.

    “They are clinically effective and highly sought-after, but have thus far only been discovered serendipitously.”
    “Although highly sought-after, molecular glue degraders have only been found serendipitously, and there are currently limited strategies available for identifying or designing such compounds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this work, molecular glue degraders were known to act only through substrate-recruiting modules of E3 ligases.

    “Molecular glue degraders have thus far only been shown to engage substrate-recruiting E3 ligase modules.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Biotinylated DDB1 binds Alexa488-labeled cycK-CDK12 with equimolar stoichiometry.

    “assuming equimolar binding of biotinDDB1 to Alexa488cycK-CDK12 using the equations described previously8.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The compound binding follows a single-site model.

    “assuming a single binding site using Prism 7 (GraphPad).”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Słabicki, M., Kozicka, Z., Petzold, G., Li, Y.-D., Manojkumar, M., Bunker, R. D., Donovan, K. A., Sievers, Q. L., Koeppel, J., Suchyta, D., Sperling, A. S., Fink, E. C., Gasser, J. A., Wang, L. R., Corsello, S. M., Sellar, R. S., Jan, M., Gillingham, D., Scholl, C., Fröhling, S., Golub, T. R., Fischer, E. S., Thomä, N. H., & Ebert, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Thomä, Nicolas H.
  • Ebert, Benjamin L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
585
Issue
7824
Pages
293-297
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3028901078
Cited by
433
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 19
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • European Hematology Association (TRTH160)
  • Cancer Research UK (29036)
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002542)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL082945)
  • National Cancer Institute (R35CA253125, P01CA108631, K08CA230220, P50CA206963, R01CA214608, P01CA066996, R01CA218278)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
CR8, molecular glues, cyclin K, CDK12, DDB1, ubiquitination, protein degradation, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, cancer cell lines
MeSH terms
DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Purines, Pyridines, Cyclins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review