Cited by 609Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Microglia-mediated T cell infiltration drives neurodegeneration in tauopathy

Open access
Chen, Xiaoying, Firulyova, Maria, Manis, Melissa, Herz, Jasmin, Smirnov, Igor, Aladyeva, Ekaterina, Wang, Chanung, Bao, Xin +9 more·2023·Nature

Abstract

Extracellular deposition of amyloid-β as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated, aggregated tau as neurofibrillary tangles are two of the characteristic hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease 1,2. The regional progression of brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease highly correlates with tau accumulation but not amyloid deposition 3-5, and the mechanisms of tau-mediated neurodegeneration remain elusive. Innate immune responses represent a common pathway for the initiation and progression of some neurodegenerative diseases. So far, little is known about the extent or role of the adaptive immune response and its interaction with the innate immune response in the presence of amyloid-β or tau pathology 6. Here we systematically compared the immunological milieux in the brain of mice with amyloid deposition or tau aggregation and neurodegeneration. We found that mice with tauopathy but not those with amyloid deposition developed a unique innate and adaptive immune response and that depletion of microglia or T cells blocked tau-mediated neurodegeneration. Numbers of T cells, especially those of cytotoxic T cells, were markedly increased in areas with tau pathology in mice with tauopathy and in the Alzheimer's disease brain. T cell numbers correlated with the extent of neuronal loss, and the cells dynamically transformed their cellular characteristics from activated to exhausted states along with unique TCR clonal expansion. Inhibition of interferon-γ and PDCD1 signalling both significantly ameliorated brain atrophy. Our results thus reveal a tauopathy- and neurodegeneration-related immune hub involving activated microglia and T cell responses, which could serve as therapeutic targets for preventing neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and primary tauopathies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-05788-0

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APOE4 exacerbates tau-induced neurodegeneration, partially attributed to a critical immune hub that involves IFN-driven microglial activation and interaction with cytotoxic T cells.

    “Moreover, APOE4 exacerbates tau-induced neurodegeneration, partially attributed to a critical immune hub that involves IFN-driven microglial activation and interaction with cytotoxic T cells64,65.”

    From The R136S mutation in the APOE3 gene confers resilience against tau pathology via inhibition of the cGAS-STING-IFN pathway (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    The paper reports somewhat greater brain atrophy in tauopathy mice expressing APOE4 than in those expressing APOE3, and its ‘Interaction of microglia and T cells’ section links tauopathy to interferon-activated microglia and T-cell infiltration. But the ‘Increased T cells with tau pathology’ section says T-cell increases also occur with APOE3 and mouse ApoE; the paper does not establish that this immune hub specifically explains APOE4’s additional effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • APOE4 greatly exacerbates tau-induced neurodegeneration, partially attributed to a critical immune hub involving IFN-driven microglial activation and interaction with cytotoxic T cells.

    “Moreover, APOE4 greatly exacerbates tau-induced neurodegeneration, partially attributed to a critical immune hub that involves IFN-driven microglial activation and interaction with cytotoxic T cells60,61.”

    From <i>APOE3</i> - <i>R136S</i> mutation confers resilience against tau pathology via cGAS-STING-IFN inhibition (2024) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports prominent atrophy in tauopathy mice expressing either APOE3 or APOE4, with only 'somewhat greater' atrophy in the APOE4 mice; it does not support 'greatly exacerbates' relative to APOE3. The Abstract and 'Interaction of microglia and T cells' section (pages not provided) support the described immune hub involving IFN-activated microglia and cytotoxic T cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A prior investigation highlighted the higher inflammatory reactivity (i.e., microglial MHC II + proteins and T cells) associated with tau-induced neurodegeneration, but not those with amyloid deposition.

    “A prior investigation highlighted the higher inflammatory reactivity (i.e., microglial MHC II + proteins and T cells) associated with tau-induced neurodegeneration, but not those with amyloid deposition [88].”
  • Apoe deletion rescued brain atrophy and altered microglia and T cells, tying together the role of APOE and the innate and adaptive immune responses to tau vs. plaques via microglia.

    “Moreover, Apoe deletion rescued brain atrophy and altered microglia and T cells, tying together the role of APOE and the innate and adaptive immune responses to tau vs. plaques via microglia [88].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. [1]Duyckaerts C, Delatour B & Potier MC Classification and basic pathology of Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol 118, 5– 36, doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0532-1 (2009). 19381658 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Masters CL Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1, 15056, doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 (2015). 27188934 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Jack CR Jr. & Holtzman DM Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 80, 1347– 1358, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.003 (2013). 24360540 PMC3928967 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Musiek ES & Holtzman DM Three dimensions of the amyloid hypothesis: time, space and ‘wingmen’. Nat Neurosci 18, 800– 806, doi: 10.1038/nn.4018 (2015). 26007213 PMC4445458 · DOI
  5. [5]Giannakopoulos P Tangle and neuron numbers, but not amyloid load, predict cognitive status in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 60, 1495– 1500, doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000063311.58879.01 (2003). 12743238 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Rupp NJ, Wegenast-Braun BM, Radde R, Calhoun ME & Jucker M Early onset amyloid lesions lead to severe neuritic abnormalities and local, but not global neuron loss in APPPS1 transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging 32, 2324 e2321–2326, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.08.014 (2011). 20970889 · DOI
  7. [10]Giannoni P Cerebrovascular pathology during the progression of experimental Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 88, 107– 117, doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.001 (2016). 26774030 · DOI
  8. [13]Hammond TR, Marsh SE & Stevens B Immune Signaling in Neurodegeneration. Immunity 50, 955– 974, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.016 (2019). 30995509 PMC6822103 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [16]Mrdjen D High-Dimensional Single-Cell Mapping of Central Nervous System Immune Cells Reveals Distinct Myeloid Subsets in Health, Aging, and Disease. Immunity 48, 380– 395 e386, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.011 (2018). 29426702 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [18]Fischer HG & Reichmann G Brain dendritic cells and macrophages/microglia in central nervous system inflammation. J Immunol 166, 2717– 2726, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2717 (2001). 11160337 · DOI
  11. [19]Gate D CD4(+) T cells contribute to neurodegeneration in Lewy body dementia. Science 374, 868– 874, doi: 10.1126/science.abf7266 (2021). 34648304 PMC9122025 · DOI
  12. [20]Zenaro E Neutrophils promote Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat Med 21, 880– 886, doi: 10.1038/nm.3913 (2015). 26214837 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [21]Subbarayan MS, Hudson C, Moss LD, Nash KR & Bickford PC T cell infiltration and upregulation of MHCII in microglia leads to accelerated neuronal loss in an alpha-synuclein rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 17, 242, doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01911-4 (2020). 32799878 PMC7429710 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [24]Merlini M, Kirabali T, Kulic L, Nitsch RM & Ferretti MT Extravascular CD3+ T Cells in Brains of Alzheimer Disease Patients Correlate with Tau but Not with Amyloid Pathology: An Immunohistochemical Study. Neurodegener Dis 18, 49– 56, doi: 10.1159/000486200 (2018). 29402847 · DOI
  15. [25]Laurent C Hippocampal T cell infiltration promotes neuroinflammation and cognitive decline in a mouse model of tauopathy. Brain 140, 184– 200, doi: 10.1093/brain/aww270 (2017). 27818384 PMC5382942 · DOI
  16. [26]Lee SH TREM2-independent oligodendrocyte, astrocyte, and T cell responses to tau and amyloid pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer disease. Cell Rep 37, 110158, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110158 (2021). 34965428 · DOI
  17. [27]Norris GT & Kipnis J Immune cells and CNS physiology: Microglia and beyond. J Exp Med 216, 60– 70, doi: 10.1084/jem.20180199 (2019). 30504438 PMC6314530 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [28]Chen X Transcriptomic mapping uncovers Purkinje neuron plasticity driving learning. Nature 605, 722– 727, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04711-3 (2022). 35545673 PMC9887520 · DOI
  19. [29]Da Mesquita S, Fu Z & Kipnis J The Meningeal Lymphatic System: A New Player in Neurophysiology. Neuron 100, 375– 388, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.022 (2018). 30359603 PMC6268162 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [30]Da Mesquita S Meningeal lymphatics affect microglia responses and anti-Abeta immunotherapy. Nature 593, 255– 260, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03489-0 (2021). 33911285 PMC8817786 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [31]Rustenhoven J & Kipnis J Bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Science 366, 1448– 1449, doi: 10.1126/science.aay0479 (2019). 31857468 PMC12065005 · DOI
  22. [32]Rustenhoven J Functional characterization of the dural sinuses as a neuroimmune interface. Cell 184, 1000– 1016 e1027, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.040 (2021). 33508229 PMC8487654 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [34]Siller-Farfan JA & Dushek O Molecular mechanisms of T cell sensitivity to antigen. Immunol Rev 285, 194– 205, doi: 10.1111/imr.12690 (2018). 30129204 · DOI
  24. [35]Loetscher M Chemokine receptor specific for IP10 and mig: structure, function, and expression in activated T-lymphocytes. J Exp Med 184, 963– 969, doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.963 (1996). 9064356 PMC2192763 · DOI
  25. [36]Madore C, Yin Z, Leibowitz J & Butovsky O Microglia, Lifestyle Stress, and Neurodegeneration. Immunity 52, 222– 240, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.003 (2020). 31924476 PMC7234821 · DOI
  26. [39]Neefjes J, Jongsma ML, Paul P & Bakke O Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat Rev Immunol 11, 823– 836, doi: 10.1038/nri3084 (2011). 22076556 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [41]Mathys H Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep 21, 366– 380, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039 (2017). 29020624 PMC5642107 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [43]Khalil M Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 14, 577– 589, doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z (2018). 30171200 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [44]Pardoll DM The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12, 252– 264, doi: 10.1038/nrc3239 (2012). 22437870 PMC4856023 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [45]Sharpe AH & Pauken KE The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat Rev Immunol 18, 153– 167, doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.108 (2018). 28990585 · DOI
  31. [46]Rosenzweig N PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade harnesses monocyte-derived macrophages to combat cognitive impairment in a tauopathy mouse model. Nat Commun 10, 465, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08352-5 (2019). 30692527 PMC6349941 · DOI
  32. [48]Kumagai S The PD-1 expression balance between effector and regulatory T cells predicts the clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapies. Nat Immunol 21, 1346– 1358, doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0769-3 (2020). 32868929 · DOI
  33. [49]Turley SJ, Fletcher AL & Elpek KG The stromal and haematopoietic antigen-presenting cells that reside in secondary lymphoid organs. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 813– 825, doi: 10.1038/nri2886 (2010). 21088682 · DOI
  34. [51]Huynh TV Lack of hepatic apoE does not influence early Abeta deposition: observations from a new APOE knock-in model. Mol Neurodegener 14, 37, doi: 10.1186/s13024-019-0337-1 (2019). 31623648 PMC6796484 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [52]Noguchi T Temporally Distinct PD-L1 Expression by Tumor and Host Cells Contributes to Immune Escape. Cancer Immunol Res 5, 106– 117, doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0391 (2017). 28073774 PMC5510474 · DOI
  36. [53]Wozniak DF Motivational disturbances and effects of L-dopa administration in neurofibromatosis-1 model mice. PLoS One 8, e66024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066024 (2013). 23762458 PMC3677926 · DOI
  37. [54]Yuede CM Behavioral consequences of NMDA antagonist-induced neuroapoptosis in the infant mouse brain. PLoS One 5, e11374, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011374 (2010). 20613880 PMC2894063 · DOI
  38. [55]Khuchua Z Deletion of the N-terminus of murine map2 by gene targeting disrupts hippocampal ca1 neuron architecture and alters contextual memory. Neuroscience 119, 101– 111, doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00094-0 (2003). 12763072 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Firulyova, M., Manis, M., Herz, J., Smirnov, I., Aladyeva, E., Wang, C., Bao, X., Finn, M. B., Hu, H., Shchukina, I., Kim, M. W., Yuede, C. M., Kipnis, J., Artyomov, M. N., Ulrich, J. D., & Holtzman, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU)
Corresponding author
Holtzman, David M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-03-08
Volume
615
Issue
7953
Pages
668-677
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4323542992
Cited by
609
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 173 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 81
FWCI
61.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  • Children's Discovery Institute (CDI-CORE-2019-813, CDI-CORE-2015-505)
  • Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2022, 075-15-, 075‐15‐2022‐301)
  • Center for Cellular Imaging, Washington University
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS090934, RF1NS090934)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, microglia, T cell infiltration, neurodegeneration, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, T cell exhaustion, interferon-gamma, brain atrophy, innate and adaptive immunity, neuronal loss, primary tauopathies
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Clone Cells, Immunity, Innate, Interferon-gamma, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Microglia, Tauopathies, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review