CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Massively parallel single-cell mitochondrial DNA genotyping and chromatin profiling

Lareau, Caleb A., Ludwig, Leif S., Muus, Christoph, Gohil, Satyen H., Zhao, Tongtong, Chiang, Zachary, Pelka, Karin, Verboon, Jeffrey M., Luo, Wendy, Christian, Elena, Rosebrock, Daniel, Getz, Gad, Boland, Genevieve M., Chen, Fei, Buenrostro, Jason D., Hacohen, Nir, Wu, Catherine J., Aryee, Martin J., Regev, Aviv, Sankaran, Vijay G.·2021·Nature Biotechnology
DOI 10.1038/s41587-020-0645-6PMC PMC7878580
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-020-0645-6

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Stewart, J. B. & Chinnery, P. F. The dynamics of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: implications for human health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 530–542 (2015). · DOI
  2. Shoffner, J. M. & Wallace, D. C. Mitochondrial genetics: principles and practice. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51, 1179–1186 (1992).
  3. Elliott, H. R., Samuels, D. C., Eden, J. A., Relton, C. L. & Chinnery, P. F. Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations are common in the general population. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 254–260 (2008). · DOI
  4. Morris, J. et al. Pervasive within-mitochondrion single-nucleotide variant heteroplasmy as revealed by single-mitochondrion sequencing. Cell Rep. 21, 2706–2713 (2017). · DOI
  5. Kang, E. et al. Age-related accumulation of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in adult-derived human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 18, 625–636 (2016). · DOI
  6. Ludwig, L. S. et al. Lineage tracing in humans enabled by mitochondrial mutations and single-cell genomics. Cell 176, 1325–1339.e22 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Xu, J. et al. Single-cell lineage tracing by endogenous mutations enriched in transposase accessible mitochondrial DNA. eLife 8, e45105 (2019). · DOI
  8. Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 916–924 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 959–962 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ross, M. G. et al. Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data. Genome Biol. 14, R51 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  12. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Green, B., Bouchier, C., Fairhead, C., Craig, N. L. & Cormack, B. P. Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons. Mob. DNA 3, 3 (2012). · DOI
  14. Dames, S. et al. The development of next-generation sequencing assays for the mitochondrial genome and 108 nuclear genes associated with mitochondrial disorders. J. Mol. Diagn. 15, 526–534 (2013). · DOI
  15. Wallace, D. C. & Chalkia, D. Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a021220 (2013). · DOI
  16. Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523, 486–490 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lee, J. H. et al. Fluorescent in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) of RNA for gene expression profiling in intact cells and tissues. Nat. Protoc. 10, 442–458 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wu, S.-P. et al. Increased COUP-TFII expression in adult hearts induces mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in heart failure. Nat. Commun. 6, 8245 (2015). · DOI
  19. Zunino, R., Schauss, A., Rippstein, P., Andrade-Navarro, M. & McBride, H. M. The SUMO protease SENP5 is required to maintain mitochondrial morphology and function. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1178–1188 (2007). · DOI
  20. Powell, C. A. et al. TRMT5 mutations cause a defect in post-transcriptional modification of mitochondrial tRNA associated with multiple respiratory-chain deficiencies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 319–328 (2015). · DOI
  21. Kugeratski, F. G. et al. Hypoxic cancer–associated fibroblasts increase NCBP2-AS2/HIAR to promote endothelial sprouting through enhanced VEGF signaling. Sci. Signal. 12, eaan8247 (2019). · DOI
  22. Brusco, J. & Haas, K. Interactions between mitochondria and the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) regulate neuronal structural and functional plasticity and metaplasticity. J. Physiol. 593, 3471–3481 (2015). · DOI
  23. Lott, M. T. et al. mtDNA variation and analysis using mitomap and mitomaster. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 44, 1.23.1–26 (2013). · DOI
  24. Bohrson, C. L. et al. Linked-read analysis identifies mutations in single-cell DNA-sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 51, 749–754 (2019). · DOI
  25. Zafar, H., Wang, Y., Nakhleh, L., Navin, N. & Chen, K. Monovar: single-nucleotide variant detection in single cells. Nat. Methods 13, 505–507 (2016). · DOI
  26. Roos-Weil, D. et al. Mutational and cytogenetic analyses of 188 CLL patients with trisomy 12: a retrospective study from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) working group. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 57, 533–540 (2018). · DOI
  27. Izumi, D. et al. TIAM1 promotes chemoresistance and tumor invasiveness in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 10, 267 (2019). · DOI
  28. Hofbauer, S. W. et al. Tiam1/Rac1 signals contribute to the proliferation and chemoresistance, but not motility, of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood 123, 2181–2188 (2014). · DOI
  29. Damm, F. et al. Acquired initiating mutations in early hematopoietic cells of CLL patients. Cancer Discov. 4, 1088–1101 (2014). · DOI
  30. Kikushige, Y. et al. Self-renewing hematopoietic stem cell is the primary target in pathogenesis of human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell 20, 246–259 (2011). · DOI
  31. Alizadeh, A. A. & Majeti, R. Surprise! HSC are aberrant in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell 20, 135–136 (2011). · DOI
  32. Osorio, F. G. et al. Somatic mutations reveal lineage relationships and age-related mutagenesis in human hematopoiesis. Cell Rep. 25, 2308–2316.e4 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Granja, J. M. et al. Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies regulatory programs in mixed-phenotype acute leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1458–1465 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Integrated single-cell analysis maps the continuous regulatory landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Cell 173, 1535–1548.e16 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Pliner, H. A. et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol. Cell 71, 858–871.e8 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Choi, J. et al. Haemopedia RNA-seq: a database of gene expression during haematopoiesis in mice and humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D780–D785 (2019). · DOI
  37. Ju, Y. S. et al. Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. eLife 3, e02935 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sun, J. et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature 514, 322–327 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Biasco, L. et al. In vivo tracking of human hematopoiesis reveals patterns of clonal dynamics during early and steady-state reconstitution phases. Cell Stem Cell 19, 107–119 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Scala, S. et al. Dynamics of genetically engineered hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells after autologous transplantation in humans. Nat. Med. 24, 1683–1690 (2018). · DOI
  41. Walker, M. A. et al. Purifying selection against pathogenic mitochondrial DNA in human T cells. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001265 (2020). · DOI
  42. Lee, S. R. & Han, J. Mitochondrial mutations in cardiac disorders. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 982, 81–111 (2017). · DOI
  43. Triska, P. et al. Landscape of germline and somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in pediatric malignancies. Cancer Res. 79, 7 (2019). · DOI
  44. Hu, J. et al. Isolation and functional characterization of human erythroblasts at distinct stages: implications for understanding of normal and disordered erythropoiesis in vivo. Blood 121, 3246–3253 (2013). · DOI
  45. Giani, F. C. et al. Targeted application of human genetic variation can improve red blood cell production from stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 18, 73–78 (2016). · DOI
  46. Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J. R. & Marth, G. T. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28, 593–594 (2012). · DOI
  47. Lareau, C. A., Ma, S., Duarte, F. M. & Buenrostro, J. D. Inference and effects of barcode multiplets in droplet-based single-cell assays. Nat. Commun. 11, 866 (2020). · DOI
  48. Lander, E. S. & Waterman, M. S. Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 2, 231–239 (1988). · DOI
  49. Chen, F., Tillberg, P. W. & Boyden, E. S. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science 347, 543–548 (2015). · DOI
  50. van Dekken, H., Pinkel, D., Mullikin, J. & Gray, J. W. Enzymatic production of single-stranded DNA as a target for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 97, 1–5 (1988). · DOI
  51. Larsson, C. et al. In situ genotyping individual DNA molecules by target-primed rolling-circle amplification of padlock probes. Nat. Methods 1, 227–232 (2004). · DOI
  52. Schwartz, S., Oren, R. & Ast, G. Detection and removal of biases in the analysis of next-generation sequencing reads. PLoS ONE 6, e16685 (2011). · DOI
  53. Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011). · DOI
  54. Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907 (2012). · arXiv
  55. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 38–44 (2019). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lareau, C. A., Ludwig, L. S., Muus, C., Gohil, S. H., Zhao, T., Chiang, Z., Pelka, K., Verboon, J. M., Luo, W., Christian, E., Rosebrock, D., Getz, G., Boland, G. M., Chen, F., Buenrostro, J. D., Hacohen, N., Wu, C. J., Aryee, M. J., Regev, A., & Sankaran, V. G.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
451-461
ISSN
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
DOI
10.1038/s41587-020-0645-6
PMC
PMC7878580
Cited by
315
References
15
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2023-08-31)
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01DK103794)
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSF-R-I48)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review