Cited by 287Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of synthetic enhancers

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Enhancer sequences control gene expression and comprise binding sites (motifs) for different transcription factors (TFs). Despite extensive genetic and computational studies, the relationship between DNA sequence and regulatory activity is poorly understood, and de novo enhancer design has been challenging. Here, we built a deep-learning model, DeepSTARR, to quantitatively predict the activities of thousands of developmental and housekeeping enhancers directly from DNA sequence in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. The model learned relevant TF motifs and higher-order syntax rules, including functionally nonequivalent instances of the same TF motif that are determined by motif-flanking sequence and intermotif distances. We validated these rules experimentally and demonstrated that they can be generalized to humans by testing more than 40,000 wildtype and mutant Drosophila and human enhancers. Finally, we designed and functionally validated synthetic enhancers with desired activities de novo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-022-01048-5

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. Learning important features propagating activation differences. In Proc. 34th International Conference on Machine Learning 3145–3153 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
de Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M., & Stark, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
Corresponding author
Stark, Alexander
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2022-05
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
613-624
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W4280563114
Cited by
283
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 23
FWCI
17.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Austrian Science Fund (F4303-B09, F 4303)
  • KU Leuven
  • Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
enhancer activity prediction, transcription factor binding motifs, Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review