CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic insights into human cortical organization and development through genome-wide analyses of 2,347 neuroimaging phenotypes

Warrier, Varun, Stauffer, Eva-Maria, Huang, Qin Qin, Wigdor, Emilie M., Slob, Eric A. W., Seidlitz, Jakob, Ronan, Lisa, Valk, Sofie L., Mallard, Travis T., Grotzinger, Andrew D., Romero-Garcia, Rafael, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Geschwind, Daniel H., Lancaster, Madeline A., Murray, Graham K., Gandal, Michael J., Alexander-Bloch, Aaron, Won, Hyejung, Martin, Hilary C., Bullmore, Edward T., Bethlehem, Richard A. I.·2023·Nature Genetics
DOI 10.1038/s41588-023-01475-yPMC PMC10600728
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-023-01475-y

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 102

  1. Thompson, P. M. et al. ENIGMA and global neuroscience: a decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 100 (2020). · DOI
  2. Gilmore, J. H., Knickmeyer, R. C. & Gao, W. Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 123–137 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Elliott, L. T. et al. Genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. Nature 562, 210–216 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Stein, J. L. et al. Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes. Nat. Genet. 44, 552–561 (2012). · DOI
  5. Zhao, B. et al. Common genetic variation influencing human white matter microstructure. Science 372, eabf3736 (2021). · DOI
  6. Makowski, C. et al. Discovery of genomic loci of the human cerebral cortex using genetically informed brain atlases. Science 375, 522–528 (2022). · DOI
  7. Jansen, P. R. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of brain volume identifies genomic loci and genes shared with intelligence. Nat. Commun. 11, 5606 (2020). · DOI
  8. Smith, S. M. et al. An expanded set of genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 737–745 (2021). · DOI
  9. Naqvi, S. et al. Shared heritability of human face and brain shape. Nat. Genet. 53, 830–839 (2021). · DOI
  10. Jayaraman, D., Bae, B.-I. & Walsh, C. A. The genetics of primary microcephaly. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 19, 177–200 (2018). · DOI
  11. Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Casey, B. J. et al. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 43–54 (2018). · DOI
  13. Hedman, A. M., van Haren, N. E. M., Schnack, H. G., Kahn, R. S. & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. Human brain changes across the life span: a review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1987–2002 (2012). · DOI
  14. Brouwer, R. M. et al. Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 421–432 (2022). · DOI
  15. Sodini, S. M., Kemper, K. E., Wray, N. R. & Trzaskowski, M. Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic correlations: Cheverud’s conjecture in humans. Genetics 209, 941–948 (2018). · DOI
  16. Ronan, L. et al. Differential tangential expansion as a mechanism for cortical gyrification. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2219–2228 (2014). · DOI
  17. Garcia, K. E., Kroenke, C. D. & Bayly, P. V. Mechanics of cortical folding: stress, growth and stability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170321 (2018). · DOI
  18. Richman, D. P., Stewart, R. M., Hutchinson, J. W. & Caviness, V. S. Jr. Mechanical model of brain convolutional development. Science 189, 18–21 (1975). · DOI
  19. Tallinen, T., Chung, J. Y., Biggins, J. S. & Mahadevan, L. Gyrification from constrained cortical expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12667–12672 (2014). · DOI
  20. Reillo, I., de Juan Romero, C., García-Cabezas, M. Á. & Borrell, V. A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 21, 1674–1694 (2011). · DOI
  21. Kriegstein, A., Noctor, S. & Martínez-Cerdeño, V. Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 883–890 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Akbarian, S. et al. The PsychENCODE project. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1707–1712 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Eze, U. C., Bhaduri, A., Haeussler, M., Nowakowski, T. J. & Kriegstein, A. R. Single-cell atlas of early human brain development highlights heterogeneity of human neuroepithelial cells and early radial glia. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 584–594 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Polioudakis, D. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of human neocortical development during mid-gestation. Neuron 103, 785–801 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ziffra, R. S. et al. Single-cell epigenomics reveals mechanisms of human cortical development. Nature 598, 205–213 (2021). · DOI
  26. Florio, M. & Huttner, W. B. Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. Development 141, 2182–2194 (2014). · DOI
  27. Geschwind, D. H. & Rakic, P. Cortical evolution: judge the brain by its cover. Neuron 80, 633–647 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gertz, C. C., Lui, J. H., LaMonica, B. E., Wang, X. & Kriegstein, A. R. Diverse behaviors of outer radial glia in developing ferret and human cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 2559–2570 (2014). · DOI
  29. Zeng, J. et al. Widespread signatures of natural selection across human complex traits and functional genomic categories. Nat. Commun. 12, 1164 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Fu, J. M. et al. Rare coding variation provides insight into the genetic architecture and phenotypic context of autism. Nat. Genet. 54, 1320–1331 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  32. SPARK Consortium. SPARK: a US cohort of 50,000 families to accelerate autism research. Neuron 97, 488–493 (2018). · DOI
  33. Weissbrod, O. et al. Functionally informed fine-mapping and polygenic localization of complex trait heritability. Nat. Genet. 52, 1355–1363 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kabeche, L., Nguyen, H. D., Buisson, R. & Zou, L. A mitosis-specific and R loop-driven ATR pathway promotes faithful chromosome segregation. Science 359, 108–114 (2018). · DOI
  35. Kaczmarczyk, A. & Sullivan, K. F. CENP-W plays a role in maintaining bipolar spindle structure. PLoS ONE 9, e106464 (2014). · DOI
  36. Koolen, D. A. et al. The Koolen-de Vries syndrome: a phenotypic comparison of patients with a 17q21.31 microdeletion versus a KANSL1 sequence variant. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 652–659, (2016). · DOI
  37. Zhou, X. et al. Cellular and molecular properties of neural progenitors in the developing mammalian hypothalamus. Nat. Commun. 11, 4063 (2020). · DOI
  38. Kuwayama, N. et al. A role for Hmga2 in the early-stage transition of neural stem-progenitor cell properties during mouse neocortical development. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.086330 (2021). · DOI
  39. De Crescenzo, A. et al. A splicing mutation of the HMGA2 gene is associated with Silver–Russell syndrome phenotype. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 287–293 (2015). · DOI
  40. Chenn, A. & Walsh, C. A. Regulation of cerebral cortical size by control of cell cycle exit in neural precursors. Science 297, 365–369 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Xiang, Y.-Y. et al. Versican G3 domain regulates neurite growth and synaptic transmission of hippocampal neurons by activation of epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 19358–19368 (2006). · DOI
  42. Dobyns, W. B. et al. MACF1 mutations encoding highly conserved zinc-binding residues of the GAR domain cause defects in neuronal migration and axon guidance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 1009–1021 (2018). · DOI
  43. Demange, P. A. et al. Investigating the genetic architecture of noncognitive skills using GWAS-by-subtraction. Nat. Genet. 53, 35–44 (2021). · DOI
  44. Bhaduri, A. et al. An atlas of cortical arealization identifies dynamic molecular signatures. Nature 598, 200–204 (2021). · DOI
  45. Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mesulam, M. M. From sensation to cognition. Brain 121, 1013–1052 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Alexander-Bloch, A. F. et al. On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function. Neuroimage 178, 540–551 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Sha, Z. et al. The genetic architecture of structural left–right asymmetry of the human brain. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1226–1239 (2021). · DOI
  49. Rubenstein, J. L. & Rakic, P. Genetic control of cortical development. Cereb. Cortex 9, 521–523 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sexton, C. E. et al. Accelerated changes in white matter microstructure during aging: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study. J. Neurosci. 34, 15425–15436 (2014). · DOI
  51. Pletikos, M. et al. Temporal specification and bilaterality of human neocortical topographic gene expression. Neuron 81, 321–332 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Yoon, B., Shim, Y.-S., Lee, K.-S., Shon, Y.-M. & Yang, D.-W. Region-specific changes of cerebral white matter during normal aging: a diffusion-tensor analysis. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 47, 129–138 (2008). · DOI
  53. Shi, Y. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging-based characterization of brain neurodevelopment in primates. Cereb. Cortex 23, 36–48 (2012). · DOI
  54. Coalson, T. S., Van Essen, D. C. & Glasser, M. F. The impact of traditional neuroimaging methods on the spatial localization of cortical areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6356–E6365 (2018). · DOI
  55. Kharabian Masouleh, S. et al. Influence of processing pipeline on cortical thickness measurement. Cereb. Cortex 30, 5014–5027 (2020). · DOI
  56. Alfaro-Almagro, F. et al. Confound modelling in UK Biobank brain imaging. NeuroImage 224, 117002 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Fischl, B. et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22 (2004). · DOI
  58. Van Essen, D. C., Glasser, M. F., Dierker, D. L., Harwell, J. & Coalson, T. Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. Cereb. Cortex 22, 2241–2262 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Rosen, A. F. G. et al. Quantitative assessment of structural image quality. Neuroimage 169, 407–418 (2018). · DOI
  60. Alfaro-Almagro, F. et al. Image processing and quality control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank. Neuroimage 166, 400–424 (2018). · DOI
  61. Hagler, D. J. Jr et al. Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Neuroimage 202, 116091 (2019). · DOI
  62. Daducci, A. et al. Accelerated microstructure imaging via convex optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 105, 32–44 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Schaer, M. et al. How to measure cortical folding from MR images: a step-by-step tutorial to compute local gyrification index. J. Vis. Exp. 2, e3417 (2012).
  64. Knussmann, G. N. et al. Test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer-derived volume, area and cortical thickness from MPRAGE and MP2RAGE brain MRI images. Neuroimage Rep. 2, 100086 (2022). · DOI
  65. Haddad, E. et al. Multisite test-retest reliability and compatibility of brain metrics derived from FreeSurfer versions 7.1, 6.0, and 5.3. Hum. Brain Mapp. 44, 1515–1532 (2023). · DOI
  66. Hedges, E. P. et al. Reliability of structural MRI measurements: the effects of scan session, head tilt, inter-scan interval, acquisition sequence, FreeSurfer version and processing stream. Neuroimage 246, 118751 (2022). · DOI
  67. Madan, C. R. & Kensinger, E. A. Test-retest reliability of brain morphology estimates. Brain Inform. 4, 107–121 (2017). · DOI
  68. Duff, E. et al. Reliability of multi-site UK Biobank MRI brain phenotypes for the assessment of neuropsychiatric complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection: the COVID-CNS travelling heads study. PLoS ONE 17, e0273704 (2022). · DOI
  69. O’Donnell, L. J. & Westin, C.-F. An introduction to diffusion tensor image analysis. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 22, 185–196 (2011). · DOI
  70. Tariq, M., Schneider, T., Alexander, D. C., Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. & Zhang, H. Bingham–NODDI: mapping anisotropic orientation dispersion of neurites using diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 133, 207–223 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  71. Andica, C. et al. Scan–rescan and inter-vendor reproducibility of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging metrics. Neuroradiology 62, 483–494 (2020). · DOI
  72. Kong, X.-Z. et al. Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E5154–E5163 (2018). · DOI
  73. Kurth, F., Gaser, C. & Luders, E. A 12-step user guide for analyzing voxel-wise gray matter asymmetries in statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Nat. Protoc. 10, 293–304 (2015). · DOI
  74. Leroy, F. et al. New human-specific brain landmark: the depth asymmetry of superior temporal sulcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1208–1213 (2015). · DOI
  75. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. et al.A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  76. Gogarten, S. M. et al. Genetic association testing using the GENESIS R/bioconductor package. Bioinformatics 35, 5346–5348 (2019). · DOI
  77. Jiang, L. et al. A resource-efficient tool for mixed model association analysis of large-scale data. Nat. Genet. 51, 1749–1755 (2019). · DOI
  78. Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Scott, R. A., Ong, K. K. & Perry, J. R. B. A robust example of collider bias in a genetic association study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 392–393 (2016). · DOI
  79. Hartwig, F. P., Tilling, K., Davey Smith, G., Lawlor, D. A. & Borges, M. C. Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 50, 1639–1650 (2021). · DOI
  80. Burgess, S. & Thompson, S. G. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am. J. Epidemiol. 181, 251–260 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  81. Grotzinger, A. D. et al. Multivariate genomic architecture of cortical thickness and surface area at multiple levels of analysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 946 (2023). · DOI
  82. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  83. Loh, P.-R., Kichaev, G., Gazal, S., Schoech, A. P. & Price, A. L. Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets. Nat. Genet. 50, 906–908 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  84. Zheng, J. et al. PhenoSpD: an integrated toolkit for phenotypic correlation estimation and multiple testing correction using GWAS summary statistics. Gigascience 7, giy090 (2018). · DOI
  85. Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  86. Dahlke, J. A. & Wiernik, B. M. psychmeta: an R package for psychometric meta-analysis. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 43, 415–416 (2019). · DOI
  87. Foley, C. N. et al. A fast and efficient colocalization algorithm for identifying shared genetic risk factors across multiple traits. Nat. Commun. 12, 764 (2021). · DOI
  88. Berisa, T. & Pickrell, J. K. Approximately independent linkage disequilibrium blocks in human populations. Bioinformatics 32, 283–285 (2016). · DOI
  89. Verbanck, M., Chen, C.-Y., Neale, B. & Do, R. Publisher correction: detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50, 1196 (2018). · DOI
  90. Morrison, J., Knoblauch, N., Marcus, J. H., Stephens, M. & He, X. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 52, 740–747 (2020). · DOI
  91. Hemani, G. et al. The MR-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife 7, e34408 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  92. Burgess, S. Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 922–929 (2014). · DOI
  93. Bryois, J. et al. Genetic identification of cell types underlying brain complex traits yields novel insights into the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Genet 52, 482–493 (2020). · DOI
  94. Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  95. Warrier, V. et al. Gene–environment correlations and causal effects of childhood maltreatment on physical and mental health: a genetically informed approach. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 373–386 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  96. Wright, C. F. et al. Optimising diagnostic yield in highly penetrant genomic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1559–1571 (2023). · DOI
  97. Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 82, 1273–1300 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  98. McLaren, W. et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  99. Zhu, Z. et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet. 48, 481–487 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  100. O’Brien, H. E. et al. Expression quantitative trait loci in the developing human brain and their enrichment in neuropsychiatric disorders. Genome Biol. 19, 194 (2018). · DOI
  101. Yang, J., Qi, T., Wu, Y., Zhang, F. & Zeng, J. Genetic control of RNA splicing and its distinctive role in complex trait variation. Nat. Genet. 54, 1355–1363 (2022). · DOI
  102. Qi, T. et al. Identifying gene targets for brain-related traits using transcriptomic and methylomic data from blood. Nat. Commun. 9, 2282 (2018). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 91

Metadata

Authors
Warrier, V., Stauffer, E.-M., Huang, Q. Q., Wigdor, E. M., Slob, E. A. W., Seidlitz, J., Ronan, L., Valk, S. L., Mallard, T. T., Grotzinger, A. D., Romero-Garcia, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Geschwind, D. H., Lancaster, M. A., Murray, G. K., Gandal, M. J., Alexander-Bloch, A., Won, H., Martin, H. C., Bullmore, E. T., & Bethlehem, R. A. I.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
1483-1493
ISSN
  • 1061-4036
  • 1546-1718
DOI
10.1038/s41588-023-01475-y
PMC
PMC10600728
Cited by
91
References
33
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review