Genetic Control of Cortical Development
Abstract
The cerebral cortex is the highest achievement of biological evolution and the neural substrate of human mental abilities. Molecular biological techniques have opened the possibility of investigating how specific regulatory genes and morphoregulatory molecules mediate formation of this complex structure. During evolution, the cerebral cortex has undergone disproportionate growth relative to the rest of the brain [reviewed by Northcutt and Kaas (Northcutt and Kaas, 1995)]. This increase predominately affected its surface area, rather than its thickness, and was accompanied by the addition and elaboration of functional subdivisions. Furthermore, the [deletion] region that has increased in size the most, the neocortex, acquired a characteristic laminar structure that is not readily apparent in the cortex of non-mammalian vertebrates. These changes in the size, complexity and histological organization of the cerebral cortex presumably reflect the elaboration of the cortical circuitry which ultimately endowed the human brain with its extraordinary capacity for reasoning and language. The cortex, or pallium, is comprised of several subdivisions. In mammals, these functionally distinct regions include the hippocampus, parahippocampal areas, neocortex, entorhinal cortex, olfactory cortex, claustrum and olfactory bulb. Each has characteristic histological features, wiring diagrams and functionally distinct subdomains. Based on cytoarchitectonic criteria, the human cerebral cortex was subdivided into more than 50 areas (Brodmann, 1909). More recent methods are revealing even greater complexity in the categories, number and functional significance of cortical parcellation (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). The remarkable conservation of the pattern of areal divisions within a given species suggests the existence of a highly conserved and rigidly regulated regional specification program that controls their development (Rakic, 1988). The evidence presented in this issue of Cerebral Cortex is in accord with the view that neocortical regional specification depends on interactions between intrinsic properties of cortical cells with input from subcortical structures. Cortical development has been scrutinized by developmental neurobiologists during this century. Their studies provide an essential physiological, anatomical and cellular foundation for elucidating the molecular mechanisms that regulate its assembly. The discovery of genes that regulate brain development is now revolutionizing our ability to understand the intricacies of neuroembryology, and to identify how neuropathological processes derail cortical development. Genetic studies of invertebrate development in flies and nematodes have had a fundamental role in expediting the progress. The identification of genes that regulate regional specification (e.g. gap and homeotic genes), segmentation (e.g. segment polarity genes), neurogenesis (e.g. neurogenic and proneural genes) and programmed cell death (apoptotic genes) provided key insights into regulatory genes that could control early development of the vertebrate brain. In the mid-1980s, the first mammalian homologs of genes that control early development in Drosophila were identified; these included the Hox genes. The expression of these genes have distinctive anteroposterior boundaries in the vertebrate spinal cord and hindbrain. Their expression patterns provided new evidence for a neuromeric, or segmental organization of the hindbrain [reviewed by McGinnis and Krumlauf (McGinnis and Krumlauf, 1992)]. Vertebrate homologs of Drosophila segment polarity genes, such as engrailed and wingless, have been found to be expressed in the midbrain and hindbrain [reviewed by Joyner (Joyner, 1996)]. By the late 1980s, the first candidates for genetic regulators of forebrain development began to be reported. These are the Brn genes, which were identified by their homology to the POU family of transcription factors that regulate mammalian pituitary development, and other developmental processes in flies and worms [reviewed by Wegner et al. (Wegner et al., 1993)]. The Brn genes are expressed in the forebrain and in other regions of the central nervous system (CNS). In 1990, a mouse homolog of the Drosophila neurogenic basic helix–loop– helix transcription factor achaete-scute (Mash1) was reported; like the Brn genes, Mash1 is expressed in the forebrain, as well as in more posterior regions of the CNS (Lo et al., 1991). Then, in 1991, the first forebrain-specific regulatory genes were reported: Dlx1, Dlx2 and Nkx2.1 (TTF1; T/ebp) [reviewed by Rubenstein and Puelles (Rubenstein and Puelles, 1994)]. These homeobox genes were identified either through a directed search for forebrain regulatory genes, or by their homology to other homeobox genes, or by serendipity. Within a year, the Otx and Emx genes, homologs of the orthodenticle and empty spiracle genes that control Drosophila head development, were found to be expressed in nested
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differential gene expression and gradients of signaling molecules across the embryonic brain generate prospective subdivisions of the neocortex.
“More specifically, it is well documented that differential gene expression and the gradients of signaling molecules across the embryonic brain generate prospective subdivisions of the neocortex [24–29].”
From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783 · see citing works
Specification of Cerebral Cortical Areas
Rakic, P. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291116 · Cited by 3,127 · see citing works
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674 · see citing works
Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice
Kuida, K., Zheng, T. S., Na, S., Kuan, C.-Y., Yang, D., Karasuyama, H., RAKIC, P. T., & Flavell, R. A. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384368a0 · Cited by 1,881 · see citing works
Reduced Apoptosis and Cytochrome c–Mediated Caspase Activation in Mice Lacking Caspase 9
Kuida, K., Haydar, T. F., Kuan, C.-Y., Gu, Y., Taya, C., Karasuyama, H., Su, M. S.-S., Rakic, P., & Flavell, R. A. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81476-2 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Rakic, P. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93934-p · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Kuan, C.-Y., Yang, D. D., Roy, D. R. S., Davis, R. J., RAKIC, P. T., & Flavell, R. A. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80727-8 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Puelles, L., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1993) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(93)90080-6 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Self-citationDiversity and Pattern in the Developing Spinal Cord
Tanabe, Y., & Jessell, T. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5290.1115 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Numbers, time and neocortical neuronogenesis: a general developmental and evolutionary model
Caviness, V. S., Takahashi, T., & Nowakowski, R. S. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93933-o · Cited by 566 · see citing works
The Embryonic Vertebrate Forebrain: the Prosomeric Model
Rubenstein, J. L. R., Martinez, S., Shimamura, K., & Puelles, L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7939711 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetics of programmed cell death in C. elegans: past, present and future
Metzstein, M. M., Stanfield, G. M., & Horvitz, H. R. (1998) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01573-x · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Engrailed, Wnt and Pax genes regulate midbrain-hindbrain development
Joyner, A. L. (1996) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)81383-7 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex
Glenn Northcutt, R., & Kaas, J. H. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93932-n · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Early Neocortical Regionalization in the Absence of Thalamic Innervation
Miyashita-Lin, E. M., Hevner, R., Wassarman, K. M., Martinez, S., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.906 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationAnderson, S. A. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.646 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Bulfone, A., Wang, F., Hevner, R. F., Anderson, S. A., Cutforth, T., Chen, S., Meneses, J. J., Pedersen, R. A., Axel, R., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80647-9 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationPOU-domain proteins: structure and function of developmental regulators
Wegner, M., Drolet, D. W., & Rosenfeld, M. G. (1993) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/0955-0674(93)90015-i · Cited by 258 · see citing works
The Role of Cell Death in Regulating the Size and Shape of the Mammalian Forebrain
Haydar, T. F. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.621 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Genetic Control of Cortical Regionalization and Connectivity
Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.524 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationWarren, N. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.627 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Dual Role of Brain Factor-1 in Regulating Growth and Patterning of the Cerebral Hemispheres
Dou, C.-L. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.543 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Genetic Malformations of the Human Cerebral Cortex
Walsh, C. A. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80749-7 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Emx and Otx homeobox genes in the developing mouse brain
Boncinelli, E., Gulisano, M., & Broccoli, V. (1993) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.480241008 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
1 Homeobox Gene Expression during Development of the Vertebrate Brain
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Puelles, L. (1994) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60546-3 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular Gradients and Compartments in the Embryonic Primate Cerebral Cortex
Donoghue, M. J. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.586 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Patterning Events and Specification Signals in the Developing Hippocampus
Grove, E. A. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.551 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Molecular Development of Sensory Maps
O’Leary, D. D. M., Yates, P. A., & McLaughlin, T. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80565-6 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Specification of Somatosensory Area Identity in Cortical Explants
Gitton, Y., Cohen‐Tannoudji, M., & Wassef, M. (1999) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-12-04889.1999 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Coexistence of Widespread Clones and Large Radial Clones in Early Embryonic Ferret Cortex
Ware, M. L. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.636 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Otx Genes in Corticogenesis and Brain Development
Acampora, D. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.533 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Arimatsu, Y. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.569 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Regulation of patterning and differentiation in the embryonic vertebrate forebrain
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Shimamura, K. (1998) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111668.003.0010 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationComplex Signaling Responsible for Molecular Regionalization of the Cerebral Cortex
Eagleson, K. L. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.562 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Novel Genes Expressed in the Developing Medial Cortex
Hatanaka, Y. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.6.577 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology
Rakic, P. (2009) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2719 · Cited by 1,565 · see citing works
The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3000 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited
Bystron, I., Blakemore, C., & Rakic, P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2252 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Cell-cycle control and cortical development
Dehay, C., & Kennedy, H. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2097 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Hazlett, H. C., Poe, M. D., Gerig, G., Styner, M., Chappell, C., Smith, R. G., Vachet, C., & Piven, J. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.39 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Development and arealization of the cerebral cortex
Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.009 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Development of prefrontal cortex
Kolk, S. M., & Rakic, P. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Genetic topography of brain morphology
Chen, C.-H., Fiecas, M., Gutiérrez, E. D., Panizzon, M. S., Eyler, L. T., Vuoksimaa, E., Thompson, W. K., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Jernigan, T. L., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308091110 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Crandall, J. E., McCarthy, D. M., Araki, K. Y., Sims, J. R., Ren, J.-Q., & Bhide, P. G. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5124-06.2007 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Bouwmeester, H., Smits, K., & Van Ree, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10321 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rubenstein, J. L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rubenstein, J. L.R.
- ORCID
- Rubenstein, J. L.R.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 521-523
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2016558382
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- cortical development, neocortex, regional specification, cortical parcellation, neuroembryology, gap genes, homeotic genes, segment polarity genes, cortical lamination, neurodevelopmental disorders, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis
- MeSH terms
- Cerebral Cortex, Genes, Homeobox, Humans, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review