Cited by 141Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Genetic Control of Cortical Development

Rubenstein, J. L.R.·1999·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is the highest achievement of biological evolution and the neural substrate of human mental abilities. Molecular biological techniques have opened the possibility of investigating how specific regulatory genes and morphoregulatory molecules mediate formation of this complex structure. During evolution, the cerebral cortex has undergone disproportionate growth relative to the rest of the brain [reviewed by Northcutt and Kaas (Northcutt and Kaas, 1995)]. This increase predominately affected its surface area, rather than its thickness, and was accompanied by the addition and elaboration of functional subdivisions. Furthermore, the [deletion] region that has increased in size the most, the neocortex, acquired a characteristic laminar structure that is not readily apparent in the cortex of non-mammalian vertebrates. These changes in the size, complexity and histological organization of the cerebral cortex presumably reflect the elaboration of the cortical circuitry which ultimately endowed the human brain with its extraordinary capacity for reasoning and language. The cortex, or pallium, is comprised of several subdivisions. In mammals, these functionally distinct regions include the hippocampus, parahippocampal areas, neocortex, entorhinal cortex, olfactory cortex, claustrum and olfactory bulb. Each has characteristic histological features, wiring diagrams and functionally distinct subdomains. Based on cytoarchitectonic criteria, the human cerebral cortex was subdivided into more than 50 areas (Brodmann, 1909). More recent methods are revealing even greater complexity in the categories, number and functional significance of cortical parcellation (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). The remarkable conservation of the pattern of areal divisions within a given species suggests the existence of a highly conserved and rigidly regulated regional specification program that controls their development (Rakic, 1988). The evidence presented in this issue of Cerebral Cortex is in accord with the view that neocortical regional specification depends on interactions between intrinsic properties of cortical cells with input from subcortical structures. Cortical development has been scrutinized by developmental neurobiologists during this century. Their studies provide an essential physiological, anatomical and cellular foundation for elucidating the molecular mechanisms that regulate its assembly. The discovery of genes that regulate brain development is now revolutionizing our ability to understand the intricacies of neuroembryology, and to identify how neuropathological processes derail cortical development. Genetic studies of invertebrate development in flies and nematodes have had a fundamental role in expediting the progress. The identification of genes that regulate regional specification (e.g. gap and homeotic genes), segmentation (e.g. segment polarity genes), neurogenesis (e.g. neurogenic and proneural genes) and programmed cell death (apoptotic genes) provided key insights into regulatory genes that could control early development of the vertebrate brain. In the mid-1980s, the first mammalian homologs of genes that control early development in Drosophila were identified; these included the Hox genes. The expression of these genes have distinctive anteroposterior boundaries in the vertebrate spinal cord and hindbrain. Their expression patterns provided new evidence for a neuromeric, or segmental organization of the hindbrain [reviewed by McGinnis and Krumlauf (McGinnis and Krumlauf, 1992)]. Vertebrate homologs of Drosophila segment polarity genes, such as engrailed and wingless, have been found to be expressed in the midbrain and hindbrain [reviewed by Joyner (Joyner, 1996)]. By the late 1980s, the first candidates for genetic regulators of forebrain development began to be reported. These are the Brn genes, which were identified by their homology to the POU family of transcription factors that regulate mammalian pituitary development, and other developmental processes in flies and worms [reviewed by Wegner et al. (Wegner et al., 1993)]. The Brn genes are expressed in the forebrain and in other regions of the central nervous system (CNS). In 1990, a mouse homolog of the Drosophila neurogenic basic helix–loop– helix transcription factor achaete-scute (Mash1) was reported; like the Brn genes, Mash1 is expressed in the forebrain, as well as in more posterior regions of the CNS (Lo et al., 1991). Then, in 1991, the first forebrain-specific regulatory genes were reported: Dlx1, Dlx2 and Nkx2.1 (TTF1; T/ebp) [reviewed by Rubenstein and Puelles (Rubenstein and Puelles, 1994)]. These homeobox genes were identified either through a directed search for forebrain regulatory genes, or by their homology to other homeobox genes, or by serendipity. Within a year, the Otx and Emx genes, homologs of the orthodenticle and empty spiracle genes that control Drosophila head development, were found to be expressed in nested

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/9.6.521

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differential gene expression and gradients of signaling molecules across the embryonic brain generate prospective subdivisions of the neocortex.

    “More specifically, it is well documented that differential gene expression and the gradients of signaling molecules across the embryonic brain generate prospective subdivisions of the neocortex [24–29].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubenstein, J. L. R.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Rubenstein, J. L.R.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
521-523
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2016558382
Cited by
141
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
cortical development, neocortex, regional specification, cortical parcellation, neuroembryology, gap genes, homeotic genes, segment polarity genes, cortical lamination, neurodevelopmental disorders, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Genes, Homeobox, Humans, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review